The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Essential Feminist Quotes: ‘I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers’

Posted on | October 13, 2015 | 38 Comments

Left to right: bell hooks, Jaclyn Friedman, Heather Hlavka.

“Feminist movement to eradicate heterosexism — compulsory heterosexuality — is central to efforts to end sexual oppression. . . .
“Feminist movement to end female sexual oppression is linked to lesbian liberation. . . .
“Feminist efforts to develop a political theory of sexuality must continue if sexist oppression is to be eliminated.”
— bell hooks, Feminist Theory from Margin to Center (2000)

“I’ve gone home drunk with someone on the first date — scratch that, the first meeting — and f–ked sweaty until 2 a.m.
“I ‘lost’ my ‘virginity’ at age fifteen and haven’t had the decency to regret it. . . .
“I’ve gone down and dirty with strangers on a crowded dance floor. I’ve played quarters with the wrestling team. Once, I had sex with my girlfriend in a barely hidden doorway. . . .
“And I hereby declare my right to be wild and still maintain my bodily autonomy.”
— Jaclyn Friedman, “In Defense of Going Wild,” in Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape, edited by Jaclyn Friedman and Jessica Valenti (2008)

“Coming up against ‘the wall of patriarchy’ . . . early adolescence is a defining period for young women. Many regard harassment and violence to be a normal part of everyday life in middle and high schools . . . yet most of these crimes go unreported. . . .
“Feminist scholarship . . . consistently finds that traditional gender arrangements, beliefs and behaviors reinforce women’s sexual subordination to men. . . .
“Young women overwhelmingly depicted boys and men as natural sexual aggressors, pointing to one of the main tenets of compulsory heterosexuality. . . . Male power and privilege and female acquiescence were reified in descriptions of ‘routine’ and ‘normal’ sexualized interactions.”
— Heather R. Hlavka, “Normalizing Sexual Violence,” in Gender Through the Prism of Difference, edited by Maxine Baca Zinn, Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo, Michael A. Messner and Amy M. Denissen (fifth edition, 2015)

Everything is connected in feminist theory, and who am I to question or criticize these eminent women? If feminists declare that heterosexuality is a synonym for oppression, and insist that “lesbian liberation” and “a political theory of sexuality” are central to their movement, I will simply take their word for it. If I am told that exercising a “right to be wild” is essential to feminism, I believe it. When feminists declare that middle-school boys are beneficiaries of male privilege, so that girls encounter “the wall of patriarchy” as soon as they get to sixth grade, I feel obligated to publicize this claim. Indeed, I want the whole world to know the whole truth about feminism’s “theory of sexuality,” because for too long the feminist movement has succeeded by exploiting a widespread ignorance of what feminism actually is, and what feminism actually demands.

Everything that most people consider normal, feminism condemns as wrong. To the feminist, “normal” is a synonym for “oppressive.” This is why, for example, Jaclyn Friedman uses quotation marks to signify her feminist belief that “virginity” is a patriarchal concept — a social construct which oppresses women — and that chastity is not a virtue, whereas going “down and dirty with strangers” should be celebrated as an expression of “female sexual power.” To disapprove of Friedman’s bisexual promiscuity is to oppress her because, as Heather Hlavka explains, “traditional gender arrangements, beliefs and behaviors reinforce women’s sexual subordination.” If you are a parent who wouldn’t want your daughter pursuing her “right to be wild” in this manner, then you are oppressing your daughter, infringing her “bodily autonomy,” and reinforcing her “sexual subordination to men.”

This is why I call feminism a War Against Human Nature. Once we get past the superficial rhetoric of “equality” and “progress” to examine what feminists actually believe — the movement’s esoteric doctrine — we recognize feminism as a sort of political bait-and-switch scam. The idea of feminism as a “mainstream” reform movement that everyone should support is impossible to reconcile with the radical program of social revolution that feminist theory envisions. Feminism requires eradicating “traditional gender arrangements” and constructing a sort of Brave New World in accordance with “a political theory of sexuality.”

 

When the average person sees pop singers like Beyoncé and movie stars like Emma Watson promoting feminism, of course it is not this radical ideology that comes to mind. The bizarre agenda envisioned by feminist theory is far beyond what the average person could possibly imagine, and yet this agenda is widely embraced by intellectuals within the academic Feminist-Industrial Complex of university Women’s Studies programs.

It is not just a few obscure “fringe” extremists who are promoting this ideology in our educational system. Thousands of Women’s Studies professors on hundreds of campuses are involved in teaching tens of thousands students annually. The book Feminist Theory From Margin to Center is an assigned reading in many courses, widely cited in feminist literature and excerpted in anthologies. The textbook Gender Through the Prism of Difference, published by prestigious Oxford University Press, is edited by four professors — Maxine Baca Zinn (Michigan State University), Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo and Michael A. Messner (University of Southern California) and Amy M. Denissen (California State University-Northridge). Professor Hlavka, who sees teenage girls victimized by “the wall of patriarchy,” is a professor of Social and Cultural Sciences at Marquette University. And the anthology Yes Means Yes, in which Jaclyn Friedman celebrates going “down and dirty with strangers,” helped inaugurate the “rape culture” hysteria that has swept over college campuses. Jill Filipovic recently explained:

Friedman, Valenti and other feminist bloggers became regulars on the college speaking circuit, bringing feminist ideas about consent (among other issues) to campuses across the country. In the meantime, feminist blogs grew larger, and many feminist writers transitioned to larger, more mainstream outlets. Other large media platforms saw the popularity of feminist-minded content and were quick to either hire new writers or give the long-time feminists on staff — of which there were already many in media — more space to shine. The feminist pipeline began to pump further and further out, and it seemed like overnight the F-word was everywhere.

Promoted on campus and publicized by the media, radical feminism has gained “mainstream” status without much critical examination of what “the F-word” actually means. Does it mean “lesbian liberation”? Getting drunk and having sex with strangers? Eradicating “traditional gender arrangements”? All of the above? And what would the world transformed by feminist theory look like? We need not think of these questions as hypothetical speculation, if we follow the daily news:

Well, not every teacher is having lesbian sex with her students, but if “early adolescence is a defining period for young women,” as Professor Hlavka says, and if “the F-word” is now everywhere, as Jill Filipovic says, what do we expect? If feminism aims to end the “sexist oppression” of women by “compulsory heterosexuality,” as bell hooks says, then doesn’t it make sense that “a political theory of sexuality” should be taught in public schools?

Last week, California became the first state in the nation to require lessons about sexual consent in high school sex education classes. The legislation mirrors laws passed last year mandating colleges and universities in both California and New York apply an “affirmative consent,” or “yes means yes” standard when investigating campus sexual assaults.
“California must continue to lead the nation in educating our young people — both women and men — about the importance of respect and maintaining healthy peer and dating relationships,” Assemblyman Rocky Chávez said. . . .
“We are very concerned that we are seeing a move toward consent being the arbiter of whether or not teen sex is appropriate,” said Valerie Huber, president of the National Abstinence Education Association. “We think that is a disservice to our teens and it also ignores all the scientific research showing young people are much better off both now and in the future if they don’t have sex.”

Yes, obviously, feminists want to teach sexual consent in high school because “yes means yes.” So your daughter can learn how to get “down and dirty with strangers.” Or maybe her teacher.

You can say what you want, but don’t say you weren’t warned.




 

Category: Sex Trouble

Comments

38 Responses to “Essential Feminist Quotes: ‘I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers’”

  1. CrustyB
    October 13th, 2015 @ 9:29 am

    Feminists are like homosexuals. They demand dignity for a behavior that is completely, utterly undignified. If you don’t agree to that then you’re the hater/bigot/big blue meanie, not them.

  2. RS
    October 13th, 2015 @ 9:44 am

    But remember: All those concerns about “grooming” of young children is just tea-bagging, Christianist crazy talk. All those click-bait apologies for pedophilia we’ve seen recently? No big deal. Battlefield preparation for the next step into the Abyss? You’re paranoid! Nothing to see here. Move along and shut up!

  3. Joe Guelph
    October 13th, 2015 @ 10:02 am

    “bell hooks”.
    Anyone other than e. e. cummings, who renders their full name in lowercase, deserves whatever happens to them.

  4. Guest
    October 13th, 2015 @ 10:31 am

    “If you are a parent who wouldn’t want your daughter pursuing her “right to be wild” in this manner, then you are oppressing your daughter[.]” But I don’t want my son behaving in this manner either. So am I oppressing him? Or what…?

  5. RKae
    October 13th, 2015 @ 10:33 am

    I don’t even want e.e. cummings rendered that way.

    Grammar, like science and math, has correct and incorrect.

  6. RKae
    October 13th, 2015 @ 10:34 am

    Again, I say, these damned fools never seem to notice that no one wants the bizarre world that they fantasize… so they’re going to have to impose it through force.

    In other words: oppression.

  7. Dana
    October 13th, 2015 @ 10:57 am

    Actually, some do want the bizarre world they imagine . . . at least while they’re in their twenties. Thing is, once they get into their thirties, they find themselves a lot less competitive in that arena. How many 36 year olds can play quarterbounce with the wrestling team or have sex with their girlfriends in a barely hidden doorway?

  8. Dana
    October 13th, 2015 @ 11:00 am

    Miss Friedman said:

    I’ve gone home drunk with someone on the first date — scratch that, the first meeting — and f–ked sweaty until 2 a.m.

    Really? Can you prove, then, that it was wholly consensual? After all, if you were intoxicated, could you consent? What about your partner in this?

  9. Dana
    October 13th, 2015 @ 11:08 am

    Miss Hlavka wrote:

    Young women overwhelmingly depicted boys and men as natural sexual aggressors, pointing to one of the main tenets of compulsory heterosexuality

    Elliot Rodger agrees, and wishes that you had shown him some of that sexual aggression on your part.

    Of course, the young women who are sexual initiators don’t normally make their moves on the Mr Rodgers of the world; they make their moves on the guys who are perfectly comfortable making the first move themselves.

  10. Ilion
    October 13th, 2015 @ 11:16 am

    I’d like to suggest that we start saying “accomplice” , rather than “partner”.

  11. OrangeEnt
    October 13th, 2015 @ 11:54 am

    And you’re going to beat Islamic Rage Boy how?

  12. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 13th, 2015 @ 12:27 pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeNa69uyYW0 Ridin Dirty!

  13. Southern Air Pirate
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:02 pm

    Men are evil and need to be destroyed. Oh and you can’t cause oppression on an enabled oppressor.

  14. Southern Air Pirate
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:03 pm

    From across the pond http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11928533/Why-are-feminists-so-unpleasant-to-women.html
    Remember those women that don’t believe in the cause are either abused to agree with the h8, not really women, or are enemies of the revolution.

  15. Daniel Freeman
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:07 pm

    “I’ve gone down and dirty with strangers on a crowded dance floor. I’ve played quarters with the wrestling team. Once, I had sex with my girlfriend in a barely hidden doorway. . . .“And I hereby declare my right to be wild and still maintain my bodily autonomy.”

    She needs to check her white privilege. Women in other parts of the world can’t do those sorts of things without getting raped, so white women should be modest out of global female solidarity and to raise their own consciousness of how lucky they are live around all those self-restrained white men. /intersectionalism

    ETA: I feel dirty now. One the one hand, I find it amusing to point out the inconsistencies in their “reasoning” by using it against them. On the other hand, it’s a poor rhetorical strategy since it reinforces their language.

  16. Bob Belvedere
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:10 pm

    Not only do they have Ugly Souls, theys just plain fugly.

  17. Daniel Freeman
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:19 pm

    I would say that straight feminists have a false consciousness that causes them to participate in the warping of their own nature, due to having been mentally colonized by the Lesbiarchy.

    Arrgh! I did it again, using the language of the enemy in an ironic way, which actually just reinforces their language. It’s so hard to resist…

  18. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    October 13th, 2015 @ 1:30 pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UoRKstI8Q4

    Anita Bryant was a prophet?

  19. Dana
    October 13th, 2015 @ 2:35 pm

    Looking at Miss Friedman’s picture, I’d say that he had to be drunk, blitzed, bombed out of his mind. She had to have raped him.

  20. Dana
    October 13th, 2015 @ 2:38 pm

    Do you s’pose that she played quarters with the wrestling team because she was on the wrestling team?

    At 182 lb?

    Please, someone denounce me for this!

  21. Mike G.
    October 13th, 2015 @ 3:49 pm

    You just have a way with words.

  22. RS
    October 13th, 2015 @ 3:57 pm

    BTW, someone needs to explain to Ms. Friedman that Looking for Mr. Goodbar is not a “how to” manual.

  23. Finrod Felagund
    October 13th, 2015 @ 4:02 pm

    Or they’re schoolteachers that molest their students.

  24. Durasim
    October 13th, 2015 @ 4:37 pm

    Friedman was born in 1971. Yet that won’t stop her from trying to dress and talk like she is still a teenager. At least Norma Desmond stayed in her house.

  25. Fail Burton
    October 13th, 2015 @ 5:20 pm

    Who harasses people more than these daffy feminists?

  26. Fail Burton
    October 13th, 2015 @ 5:21 pm

    Plus wasn’t a blimp.

  27. Bob Belvedere
    October 13th, 2015 @ 5:37 pm

    Indeed…the way I used to have with women [when I was single].

  28. Jason Lee
    October 14th, 2015 @ 2:26 am

    Good point. People in other parts of the world die of painful, humiliating infections when they have wild sex.

    Up until just a few decades ago, chastity was the only surefire way to avoid a gruesome death from conditions like tertiary syphilis — even in the industrialized world of white privilege.

    Feminists are incorrigible science-deniers with a profound ignorance of biology and history.

  29. NeoWayland
    October 14th, 2015 @ 8:16 am

    Trust me, you do not want an answer to that question.

  30. LeeLee
    October 14th, 2015 @ 8:22 am

    I was recently hanging out a with a girl who insisted that I too identify myself as a feminist because feminism “just means you believe men and women are equal and should be treated equally”. So one would only resist the label if they believed women to be inferior to men. And who wants to be that girl?

    It’s such a hungry, angry, demanding, shaming movement — it takes on the characteristics of broken, misdirected femininity itself.

  31. robertstacymccain
    October 14th, 2015 @ 11:07 am

    Offering this weak definition — feminism “just means you believe men and women are equal and should be treated equally” — is a way to open the door to the kind of “consciousness-raising” that leads women to perceive patriarchal oppression everywhere. Once a woman buys into this typical feminist paranoia, it becomes impossible to see males as individuals, because each man is a beneficiary of, and participant in, the general system of “male supremacy” that oppresses her. She must always view males as her enemies, and takes pride in constantly accusing men of “sexism.” Confronted by her implacable hostility, men naturally feel insulted — what have they done to deserve her accusations? — and men’s negative reactions to her insults are interpreted by her as proof of their sexism, so that the feminist’s anti-male attitude becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    Thus, we return to this definition of feminism as mere “equality.” The women who shout the loudest about “equality” are usually quite privileged, and their demand for “equality” (when examined objectively) turns out to be a demand that men treat them with deference, acknowledging the feminist as morally and intellectually superior.

    Yeah. As if a man can’t recognize the smell of bullshit when he’s downwind of a pasture.

  32. robertstacymccain
    October 14th, 2015 @ 11:08 am

    “I’m ready for my close-up now, Mr. Demille!”

  33. Feminist Tumblr: ‘Broken People’ : The Other McCain
    October 14th, 2015 @ 12:36 pm

    […] who spend decades living on public assistance. Crazy women like Jaclyn Friedman, who declares her “right to be wild” and go “down and dirty with strangers,” continue to be celebrated as feminism’s heroic […]

  34. Isa
    October 15th, 2015 @ 1:06 pm

    while it’s not the only way anymore, it’s certainly the cheapest and the best.

  35. Essential Feminist Quotes: ‘I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers’ | Living in Anglo-America
    October 17th, 2015 @ 7:57 am

    […] http://kxm.209.mwp.accessdomain.com/2015/10/13/essential-feminist-quotes-ive-gone-down-and-dirty-with-stranger… […]

  36. FMJRA 2.0: Is It Fall Yet? : The Other McCain
    October 17th, 2015 @ 7:55 pm

    […] Essential Feminist Quotes: ‘I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers’ Living In Anglo-America Batshit Crazy News […]

  37. Feminist Tumblr: ‘Broken People’ | Living in Anglo-America
    October 18th, 2015 @ 3:53 pm

    […] who spend decades living on public assistance. Crazy women like Jaclyn Friedman, who declares her “right to be wild” and go “down and dirty with strangers,”continue to be celebrated as feminism’s heroic […]

  38. The News of the Week (October 18th, 2015) | The Political Hat
    October 18th, 2015 @ 6:02 pm

    […] Essential Feminist Quotes: “I’ve Gone Down and Dirty With Strangers” Everything is connected in feminist theory, and who am I to question or criticize these eminent women? […]