The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism
Posted on | September 10, 2013 | 151 Comments
If there is no God, there is only Science and, as everyone who has studied the “climate change” phenomenon is aware, Science involves a self-selecting cabal of credentialed insiders empowered to dismiss criticism from anyone who does not concur in the sacred consensus.
So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!
Richard Dawkins, one of the world’s best-known and outspoken atheists, has provoked outrage among child protection agencies and experts after suggesting that recent child abuse scandals have been overblown.
In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.
Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”
He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.” . . .
“I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.
He said the most notorious cases of pedophilia involve rape and even murder and should not be bracketed with what he called “just mild touching up.”
This just in: Man who has spent entire adult public life attempting a Freudian vengeance against God-As-Father-Figure-Betrayer announces that a bit of “mild pedophilia” did “no lasting harm” to his psychology.
See more at Salon, Memeorandum and Gateway Pundit — but you know, who has been warning you about this? Who took alarm over the Kaitlyn Hunt story? Who told you about the atheist sex scandal?
Who told you about the Pervert Party and the New Abnormal? What about Slutwalk Insanity and the Psychotic Professor?
Does anyone else see a pattern here? Perhaps the apostles of the Gospel of Science could examine these correlations, and confirm my impression that there is a distinct non-randomness involved.
Did I ever mention that Brett Kimberlin is an atheist?
Comments
151 Responses to “The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism”
September 10th, 2013 @ 9:58 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism: If there is no God, there is only Science and, as everyone who has stu… http://t.co/Nay48RVhDz
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:05 pm
Interesting that Dawkins equates caning, with pedophilia.
Spare the rod, spoil the child = perversion?
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:06 pm
RT @smitty_one_each: TOM The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/ItZ1hqeyyY #TCOT
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:07 pm
Brett really isn’t an atheist per se, he holds himself as his own god …
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:08 pm
Well, Dawkins’ pudding is underdone anyway …
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:08 pm
“So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!” http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH | @MelissaTweets @AceofSpadesHQ #FreeKate
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:09 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/PO6fCUoi9U
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:10 pm
Can anyone think of an atheist who’s OK with pedophilia? http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH Besides Richard Dawkins, I mean.
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:10 pm
@mike4libertyCA @TwitchyTeam MT @rsmccain Atheist #Pedogenda http://t.co/bxvnjGDKwR … |
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:11 pm
Because all of science is henceforth smeared with the specter of Phil Mann…and atheists can forevermore be equated with ‘mild pedophilia’…
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:11 pm
BTW, Dawkins is an ass
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:11 pm
RT @rsmccain: Can anyone think of an atheist who’s OK with pedophilia? http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH Besides Richard Dawkins, I mean.
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:12 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/4evwXPZsUY #news #conservative #science #sex
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:13 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/h3cmK0zh5g
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:13 pm
RT @rsmccain: “So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!” http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH | @MelissaTweets @AceofSpadesHQ #FreeKate
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:13 pm
RT @ConserveTruth13: @mike4libertyCA @TwitchyTeam MT @rsmccain Atheist #Pedogenda http://t.co/bxvnjGDKwR … |
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:14 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/q8gF9I9NNh
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:16 pm
RT @rsmccain: “So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!” http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH | @MelissaTweets @AceofSpadesHQ #FreeKate
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:18 pm
What more need to be said?
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:22 pm
Dawkins is a victim of “the pip” — a mild form of insanity common in the inbred upper classes…
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:27 pm
Prescient. I’ve often heard it said about Nostradamus that he was good at reading his Bible.
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:31 pm
Bravo! > “@rsmccain: “So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!” http://t.co/Ilaw3JetBK | #FreeKate #AbuseISAbuse
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:46 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism : The Other McCain http://t.co/LzMQtzLXQN
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:49 pm
Unintended consequences really have a habit of biting your lot in the ass …
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:49 pm
RT @rsmccain: Can anyone think of an atheist who’s OK with pedophilia? http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH Besides Richard Dawkins, I mean.
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:50 pm
Heh. Pot meet kettle …
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:50 pm
“Unintended consequences really have a habit of biting your lot in the ass …” — rmnixondeceased http://t.co/9atssHCiNI
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:51 pm
“Heh. Pot meet kettle …” — rmnixondeceased http://t.co/EHSOGDGFRJ
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:51 pm
“Because all of science is henceforth smeared with the specter of Phil Mann…and atheists can…” — tracycoyle http://t.co/ev7VBTDCiD
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:51 pm
RT @sokeijarhead: The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism : The Other McCain http://t.co/LzMQtzLXQN
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:52 pm
Now appearing in those suffering from Special Snowflake Syndrome …
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:59 pm
Your lot? what ‘lot’ is that?
September 10th, 2013 @ 10:59 pm
We were warmed about this 2000 years ago, and here we are.
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:00 pm
RT @rsmccain: “So child molestation is harmless — the Science is settled!” http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH | @MelissaTweets @AceofSpadesHQ #FreeKate
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:02 pm
Any group of mentally aberrant, anti-social, deluded and assclownish folks willing to associate with you.
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:05 pm
Never thought of it that way… I suppose it might be the same thing, now that you mention it!
Special… Snowflake… Syndrome… “Tinny”, “woody”, “woody”!
Pip! Pip!
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:07 pm
Seems like a pretty BIG lot then…
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:09 pm
Heh … http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imWlSMgMFGE
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:10 pm
It’s all relative. Besides, once you’re dead, what difference will it make to you?
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:15 pm
Ahhh…so you made ANOTHER assumption based on a personal bias….
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:16 pm
“Without God all is permitted.” – Fyodor Dostoevsky
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:19 pm
What assumption is that?
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:25 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism » good read http://t.co/UrTo2LRb0Y via @feedly
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:28 pm
The Non-Existent Moral Code of Atheism http://t.co/tAdVE5S2rD
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:30 pm
The British and their boarding schools. I swear about 50% of British males in “public schools” have been buggered by the other 50% of British males.
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:30 pm
RT @rsmccain: Can anyone think of an atheist who’s OK with pedophilia? http://t.co/z2ZGYPQ3AH Besides Richard Dawkins, I mean.
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:31 pm
That my friends and family are aberrant, anti-social, deluded or assclownish…that I am atheist…
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:34 pm
The former is factual the latter is your persecution complex. I neither know nor care what your belief (or unbelief) is. It doesn’t enter into my understanding of you or your comments. That I even care about your belief or lack of belief is an assumption on your part.
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:37 pm
BTW, it’s deluded AND assclownish, not or as you posted. Keep the mockery straight or you’ll lose all the flavor …
September 10th, 2013 @ 11:40 pm
Well, as long as you have your facts and assumptions….