The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Indecent Liberties: Police Say Teacher Showed Her Nude Selfies to Teen Girls

Posted on | June 20, 2015 | 47 Comments

Melissa Waters Kidd, 34.

Parents in Newport News were shocked last month when it was reported that a teacher at Woodside High School was under investigation:

A search warrant filed in the case indicated three students told police the 34-year-old teacher showed them before-and-after photos of her breast augmentation. The photos were on the teacher’s phone. One student said the teacher also shared photos of her genitals.
“To me that’s pornographic, it’s not okay. It’s not okay,” Woodside High School mom Angela Leslie said. “I hope it’s not true.”

The teacher, who had been put on administrative leave in March and resigned in April, was finally charged on Thursday:

former Woodside High School teacher was arrested and charged with three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child, according to a statement from the Newport News Police Department.
Melissa Waters Kidd, 34, of the 100 block of Raptor Boulevard in Hampton, was arrested June 18. She was placed in the custody of the Newport News City Jail.
The two female victims were 16 and 17 years old at the time the offenses occurred, according to the police.

(Hat-tip: Michael Ryan on Twitter.)

In England, meanwhile, a lesbian teacher at an elite school who had sex with one of her students did not even face criminal charges:

A games coach at a top boarding school has been banned from teaching after she had lesbian sex with one of her 15-year-old pupils at her parent’s house.
Lauren Chandler, 24, who was also a teacher and residential house tutor at the private £7,400-a-term Dover College, Kent, began the inappropriate relationship in October 2012.
The pair exchanged inappropriate and flirtatious messages and pictures referring to each other as ‘babe’ and ‘beautiful’ with repeated use of ‘heart’ symbols.
Chandler then invited the girl, referred to as Pupil A, to stay at her parents’ house over the half-term holiday, the National College for Teaching and Leadership heard.
A professional conduct panel found Chandler had slept with the girl and engaged in two-way sexual touching. . . .
“Criminal investigations did not proceed due to Pupil A’s refusal, with the support of her parents, to take matters further.”
But Chandler was banned Britain’s classrooms for life after the panel found her conduct was “sexually motivated”.
Department for Education official Paul Heathcote said: “Miss Chandler has abused her position of trust by causing her relationship with Pupil A to develop beyond proper professional boundaries.
“She has committed serious sexual misconduct with a child and her actions were both deliberate and repeated.
“She has not demonstrated any remorse or insight into her behaviour having not engaged with this process in any significant way.
“I agree with the panel’s recommendation that prohibition is an appropriate and proportionate sanction.”

(Hat-tip: Melvin Vines on Twitter.)

COMPLETELY RANDOM COINCIDENCES:

It’s almost as if there’s a pattern here or something.

“Feminism means equality, and radical ideologues
aim to make women equally deviant,
equally perverse, equally abnormal, so that
women can equally molest young girls and boys.”

Few feminists have children of their own, because they hate children.

“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding . . . time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness. . . . I don’t want a baby. . . . Nothing will make me want a baby. . . . This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.”
— Amanda Marcotte, March 14, 2014

This is why feminists are obsessed with other people’s children. Will your children become casualties in their War Against Human Nature?





 

Category: Crime, Education, Sex Trouble

Comments

47 Responses to “Indecent Liberties: Police Say Teacher Showed Her Nude Selfies to Teen Girls”

  1. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    June 20th, 2015 @ 6:53 pm

    Are they putting something in the water in the teacher’s lounge?

  2. Mike G.
    June 20th, 2015 @ 7:21 pm

    Well, evidently it ain’t Saltpeter, IYKWIM.

  3. DeadMessenger
    June 20th, 2015 @ 8:30 pm

    Clearly feminism is a factor in these incidents. I don’t see how any intelligent person could deny that. But it’s also women in a 30+ year old body, with an emotional age of 17. What ever happened to growing up and maturing? To looking forward to adulthood and taking on adult responsibilities, like jobs, marriage and children? All I can do is sigh and shake my head sadly.

  4. trangbang68
    June 20th, 2015 @ 9:00 pm

    saltpeter doesn’t affect strap-ons

  5. theoldsargesays
    June 20th, 2015 @ 9:34 pm

    #TeachLesbianTeachersNotToRape

  6. Jeanette Victoria
    June 20th, 2015 @ 10:24 pm

    We as a society aren’t raising grown-ups anymore

  7. M. Thompson
    June 20th, 2015 @ 11:46 pm

    Women have rights, men have responsibilities.

  8. Matt_SE
    June 21st, 2015 @ 12:56 am

    It’s about power and control. When lesbian feminists say that about men, they’re really admitting it about themselves.

  9. Daniel Freeman
    June 21st, 2015 @ 2:11 am

    Agreed. The first three rules of SJWs are that they always lie, project and double down. That “hetero sex is really about power” thing is an example of projection.

  10. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    June 21st, 2015 @ 8:54 am

    Oh!

  11. CPAguy
    June 21st, 2015 @ 10:11 am

    The first teacher’s issues didn’t really seem criminal in nature. Just misguided. Teachers shouldn’t be treating their students the same as the folks they pal around with.

    I think the criminal justice system is sometimes used to much.

    Of course, the second teacher’s story is certainly criminal.

  12. Anon Y. Mous
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:00 am

    Regarding the first case, the facts are a bit unclear. But, if it is true that all that occurred is that a female teacher showed before and after pics of her boob job to 16 & 17 year old female students, then that sounds harmless. Unless they are going to start making arrests of all those who expose a breast in the girls locker room, I don’t get the hysteria. (Shocked parents!!!) The case hardly seems on par with those in which the teachers were having sex with the students.

  13. darleenclick
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:26 am

    Just an aside re the Mandy Marcotte quote: She hates babies enough to actually want to kill them … becuz if she was serious enough about not ever getting pregnant she would have already gotten her tubes tied. IMO she wants her b/c to “fail” so she can have an abortion. Give it time.

  14. Dr. Johnny Fever
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:34 am

    Why would ANYONE choose to get pregnant for the sole purpose of having an abortion? Why? For gods sake.

  15. postaldog
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:34 am

    It is inappropriate behavior for someone in a position of authority to be exposing themselves like that to minors. According to the report, she was also sharing pictures of her genitals, that is hardly harmless and seems more like an introductory play to get on a different level with these girls. She deserved the consequences of her actions.

  16. Daniel Freeman
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:39 am

    Though they might not know his name, they worship Moloch all the same.

  17. Dr. Johnny Fever
    June 21st, 2015 @ 11:41 am

    Helluva thing, that.

  18. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    June 21st, 2015 @ 12:17 pm

    Boob before and after, not appropriate and possible grounds for job discipline and firing, but not criminal. But didn’t one of the kids say she showed pics of her genitailia? That would be criminal, if true.

  19. Dr. Johnny Fever
    June 21st, 2015 @ 12:51 pm

    I like you blog. It’s works a little slow on my iPad, but still…..

  20. Anon Y. Mous
    June 21st, 2015 @ 1:09 pm

    What if the students had seen her genitalia live and in person in the locker room? Criminal? I don’t think so. At least not necessarily. And, there is nothing wrong with a 16/17 yo woman seeing the breasts of a 34 yo woman. At least not necessarily. If the young ladies expressed an interest and the teacher obliged, it would be harmless. Benign. Ridiculous to even make an issue of it. Unless there is some indication that she was shoving these pics in the students’ faces against their will, it is a big nothing burger.

  21. DeadMessenger
    June 21st, 2015 @ 2:21 pm

    You mean men should say, “I know you are, but what am I?” 😀

  22. DeadMessenger
    June 21st, 2015 @ 2:23 pm

    Agree 100%.

  23. DeadMessenger
    June 21st, 2015 @ 2:32 pm

    Women Feminists have rights, men have responsibilities.

    Fixed that for ya. I sure as hell have responsibilities. That underwear ain’t gonna wash and fold itself, buddy. If somebody was waiting for my husband to take care of household and familial responsibilities, they’d be waitin’ a long, long time.

  24. Steve White
    June 21st, 2015 @ 2:42 pm

    Remind me the ratio of the number of women teachers engaging in sex with minors to the number of priests engaging in sex with minors?

    We all agree the latter is despicable. Seems like a fair number in our society, including some judges and prosecutors, have no problem with the former.

  25. concern00
    June 21st, 2015 @ 3:21 pm

    Every institution with access to children has been subject to the same onslaught of homosexuals and other sexual deviants taking advantage of that access. Most have dealt with the problem very poorly, but only the church fits the leftist narrative. In the meantime the invasion of the deviants continues unchecked and even celebrated.

  26. theoldsargesays
    June 21st, 2015 @ 4:22 pm

    Fitted sheet folding….
    Woman’s responsibility or just something best kept out of men’s hands ?

  27. trangbang68
    June 21st, 2015 @ 4:48 pm

    Yeah really, what happened to professionalism, decorum and common decency? Thinking there’s nothing wrong with a teacher sending boob selfies to her students is the sign of a sick mind.

  28. trangbang68
    June 21st, 2015 @ 4:51 pm

    I see why you’re anonymous. You can’t really believe the crap you’re spouting. Like most of us, I went through public school. Granted, it was decades ago but if a teacher showed their genitals to a student, they’d be in jail.

  29. Indecent Liberties: Police Say Teacher Showed Her Nude Selfies to Teen Girls | Living in Anglo-America
    June 21st, 2015 @ 5:27 pm

    […] http://kxm.209.mwp.accessdomain.com/2015/06/20/sex-teacher-arrest-nude-photos-girls-virginia/ […]

  30. Adobe_Walls
    June 21st, 2015 @ 5:39 pm

    Precisely.

  31. Adobe_Walls
    June 21st, 2015 @ 5:40 pm

    In an as childlike voice as possible.

  32. Adobe_Walls
    June 21st, 2015 @ 5:44 pm

    Because leftism.

  33. Adobe_Walls
    June 21st, 2015 @ 5:47 pm

    Moloch doesn’t have to be a single person or entity.

  34. CPAguy
    June 21st, 2015 @ 6:27 pm

    No they wouldn’t. People have gone too far trying to criminalize everything these days and coddling the snot out of kids.

    If the first case doesn’t end up having a sexual situation underlying it, the taxpayer is getting hosed by the use of resources to attempt to institutionalize somebody over such a situation.

  35. Mike G.
    June 21st, 2015 @ 6:49 pm

    Jail my ass…they’d have been run out of town on a rail with a new wardrobe… tar and feathers.

  36. Mike G.
    June 21st, 2015 @ 6:53 pm

    Unless things have changed in the last few years, doctors won’t do a tubal litigation unless a woman has had at least one child. Besides, they are easier to do right after the birth of a child.

  37. Jeanette Victoria
    June 21st, 2015 @ 7:40 pm

    I remember a time when to teach children one had to agree to a morals clause. What more proof do we need that homosexuals should NOT be around kids?

  38. Matthew W
    June 21st, 2015 @ 8:06 pm

    Nope, nope, nope ,nope.
    Under no circumstance should ANY ADULT be showing naked naughty bits to minor children.
    It’s as simple as it seems.
    I am going to guess in the first case that there is more evidence that the DA has that has not been shared yet.

  39. theoldsargesays
    June 21st, 2015 @ 8:18 pm

    Well, since the taxpayer is already getting hosed by public sector unions to a much greater extent, I personally would mind if a bit of spare change went toward getting rid of a teacher who thinks it appropriate to share pictures of her breasts with students.

  40. trangbang68
    June 21st, 2015 @ 9:25 pm

    The taxpayer is getting hosed by paying property taxes to pay salaries of ignorant dirtbags who masquerade as teachers. I’m astonished that there are posters here who don’t see anything wrong with teachers acting out sexually with students in their charge.
    What the hell happened to the country I grew up in?

  41. trangbang68
    June 21st, 2015 @ 9:28 pm

    I had to list a thirty year old drug charge on an application to coach Little League, but apparently you can be a stanky herpes farm and the school board will put thirty kids in your charge.

  42. Daniel Freeman
    June 22nd, 2015 @ 12:50 am

    Both? As a bachelor, my poor fitted sheets simply have to endure the horror of my pathetic attempts at folding. Not to mention my t-shirts, which end up with a crease down the middle. (I’m pretty sure that means I’m doing it wrong.)

  43. Daniel Freeman
    June 22nd, 2015 @ 1:00 am

    I honestly don’t know if Moloch is a specific demon, Satan taking a different pseudonym for a different website tribe, or just a projection of the evil that resides in the hearts of men. The distinction does not seem meaningful to me.

  44. Daniel Freeman
    June 22nd, 2015 @ 1:04 am

    And the Boy Scouts. They fit the leftist narrative too.

  45. Bumr50
    June 22nd, 2015 @ 9:17 am

    I remember going to college here in PA and having a number of education majors as roommates, frat brothers, etc.

    There is indeed a mechanism whereupon you can’t (or it’s very difficult to) be board certified or whatever the teaching equivalent is here in PA if you face any sort of drug or alcohol charge here in PA including minor possession or underage consumption while you are enrolled in college. I remember them being pretty paranoid about it.

    I often thought (at the time) that it seemed extraordinarily harsh, given the atmosphere at the university I attended, and that they probably lost out on some very good teaching candidates as a result, while accepting other, maybe less “normal” ones as a result.

    The problem is that these sickos aren’t breaking any laws or doing anything that would show up on a background check – yet they are far more dangerous.

  46. Does God Support Climate Change? | Regular Right Guy
    June 22nd, 2015 @ 11:10 am

    […] Indecent Liberties: Police Say Teacher Showed Her Nude Selfies to Teen Girls […]

  47. Pakistani is not a race… | Batshit Crazy News
    June 23rd, 2015 @ 12:16 am

    […] Pakistan is a place. Pachys are not Pakistanis Instapundit/Ed Driscoll: Jurassic World called racist over dinosaur name Hey if these Pakistanis are not careful they will be called as crazy as Feminists. TOM: An expert on crazy Feminists: Oppressive Biology and Indecent Liberties […]