Who Is ‘Silencing’ Whom?
Posted on | May 26, 2015 | 150 Comments
Perhaps @juliezeilinger would care to debate this?
This is the dynamic at the heart of online harassment more generally, which, feminists have previously noted, is largely an attempt to silence women. Gamergate — a movement, ostensibly started to improve ethics in video game journalism, that morphed into a campaign of horrifying, misogynistic comments and threats directed at female gamers and critics — is one infamous example. This harassment, Guardian columnist Jessica Valenti wrote in October, is “the last, desperate gasp of misogynists facing an unwelcoming future” and is essentially the way “straight white men deal with a world that no longer revolves exclusively around them.”
Read the whole thing, which involves a story about a college feminist who was murdered. Police haven’t said anything about the motive for the murder of Grace Mann and, although there has been a great deal of speculation. it is not yet possible to know whether her murder was a consequence of her campus activism.
There is, however, another problem involved here. Neither Julie Zeilinger nor Jessica Valenti nor any other feminist will address the totalitarian climate fostered by feminism’s uncontested hegemony in academia. It is predictable that “straight white men” (why only white men, Jessica?) on university campuses don’t enjoy being constantly accused of misogyny simply because they are “straight white men.”
Exactly what are these young students, scapegoated for the crime of being male, supposed to do in reaction to such propaganda? Who will speak on their behalf? How is any student (regardless of whether they are male or female, whatever their ethnic identity or sexual orientation) supposed to obtain access to any articulate, factual and rational opposition to the anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology taught in university Women’s Studies programs? Is there any faculty member who would risk disputing feminist gender theory — the “social construction” of the gender binary within the heterosexual matrix — after Larry Summers was purged at Harvard University merely for suggesting that there may be “innate differences” between men and women”?
"If feminists don’t hate babies, why do they want to kill them?" http://t.co/XpVIZjtg7A #tcot pic.twitter.com/8tbAd62YYX
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 25, 2015
Sane people can't understand feminism because it's so hard to imagine hating anyone as much as feminists hate men. http://t.co/DmnjIotsmy
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 25, 2015
Keep Calm and Maintain Male Supremacy.
http://t.co/PUD4ItqXll pic.twitter.com/HccFUSXoxw
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 26, 2015
#YouMightBeAFeminist If you believe normal sex is a "ritual enactment" of male supremacy. http://t.co/O82AmlAdgy
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 26, 2015
#YouMightBeAFeminist If you believe an erect penis is "socially constructed." http://t.co/VdBz7NvRsp
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 26, 2015
Feminists believe normal male attraction to normal females is “objectifying,” “cisnormative,” “fetishizing,” etc. http://t.co/Gr4DPD16g1
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 26, 2015
Nobody on campus is allowed to criticize feminist theory nor to mention the hideous hatefulness of feminist rhetoric. Our universities are teaching feminists that they can lie with impunity, defame innocent people without consequence, and claim victimhood (“harassment!”) if anyone objects to their lies and insults. Every time Christina Hoff Sommers sets foot on a university campus, she is deliberately smeared, accused of being a “rape denialist,” and no one in authority — not a single administrator at any university — will dare say a word against the deranged fanaticism of the feminists who engage in these brownshirt tactics. As I explain on page 54 of Sex Trouble:
And “eventually” could arrive much sooner than most people imagine.
Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement http://t.co/y594lB5MTf @shamelessShely @jtLOL pic.twitter.com/5EepYAjvb7
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 23, 2015
"It is impossible to debate a feminist, because disagreement is hate …" http://t.co/y594lB5MTf #tcot pic.twitter.com/IRN2M63H7x
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 25, 2015
A feminist convinces herself she is oppressed, because ALL women are oppressed. There is no hope of rational discourse with such a fanatic.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 25, 2015
THE 3 PRINCIPLES OF FEMINISM
1. Selfishness
2. Dishonesty
and
3. HATE
http://t.co/XpVIZjtg7A
#tcot pic.twitter.com/HrfFzdiKin
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 25, 2015
Feminism is a brilliant scam, because the failure of feminism to actually solve anything is always proof of the need for … more feminism.
— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) May 26, 2015
Comments
150 Responses to “Who Is ‘Silencing’ Whom?”
May 27th, 2015 @ 6:26 am
Hey, how do you think men discovered LSD…moldy bread. 😉
May 27th, 2015 @ 6:54 am
I fear so, I fear so. ????
May 27th, 2015 @ 6:57 am
I’m eating deli prepared potato salad…and these people say they’re oppressed.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:03 am
I’m sorry, I found religion already. I’m Discordian.
Hail Eris!
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:05 am
No, he’s just the sort who’d show up at this kind of event.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:31 am
I agree, you have no sense of humor. Recycling some lame college freshman joke that wasn’t funny the first time is the sign of a weak mind and a wit that only works with “nit” as a prefix
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:44 am
You mad, bro? You weren’t even the person I replied to. I’m sorry you’re not allowed to have fun.
Maybe you could go whine about the ‘butt rub’ jokes above next.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:46 am
See, now you, I like you. 🙂
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:47 am
The lunchmeat in my fridge once evolved into an intelligent lifeform. True story. Never, ever put off cleaning the fridge.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:52 am
Most hardcore leftist concepts are very flimsy. You start poking at them, and they have an entertaining tendency to collapse.
I’ve often said that if your idea is good, it’ll withstand scrutiny. Much like if you have a physical object, it’ll withstand tensile strength better if it’s made from forged steel rather than if it’s made from chocolate.
But because these people are so desperately invested in their ideals, they don’t want them to be prodded and poked. So they wildly flail away at any curious fingers, and lash out even amongst themselves when one of their number makes the mistake of some critical thinking.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:53 am
With all due respect, I’d want to see the studies first. There’s a reason the line goes ‘Lies, damn lies, and statistics’.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:55 am
Honestly, I don’t even like potato salad. Give me a loaded spud any day.
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:09 am
IMHO, their goalposts don’t have legs so much as they have jet engines attached to them.
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:32 am
Now the racist Boston U. sociology professor, Saidi Grundy, has been caught taunting a white rape victim on Facebook:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/05/18/boston-university-prof-in-racist-tweet-controversy-accused-ridiculing-white/
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:38 am
If people have to create an ideology asserting they are equal, they’re not equal.
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:40 am
“Keep Calm and Maintain Male Supremacy”
Having this put on the back of a T-Shirt.
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:48 am
I could see this was nonsense 20 years ago.
Whenever they would host a “Take Back the Night” event on campus, I kept thinking “take back the night from whom?”
Campus was obviously much safer than the rest of the world.
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:53 am
Still more statistically valid than most leftist research.
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:27 am
Naw, eventually it’ll evolve to be smart enough to clean the fridge itself. That’s real male inventiveness raight thar.
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:30 am
No need to fear it. Just realize that such things MUST be recorded for posterity. After all, you have no expectation of privacy in public and all things will be remembered in direct proportion to their embarrassment factor.
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:33 am
What’s wrong with Palmetto bugs?
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:34 am
Next time, tell him to buy a bug zapper instead. The zapper also has the added entertainment value one gets from the sizzle of the little pest’s carcasses.
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:36 am
How much damage was done in killing the fungal golem?
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:37 am
Trigger Warning!!!
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:48 am
This patriarch enthusiastically approves butt rubs.
May 27th, 2015 @ 11:49 am
WHATEVER YOU DON’T CLICK THAT PIC.
You have been warned!
May 27th, 2015 @ 12:55 pm
There’s a girl who occasionally makes ludicrously silly comments over on The Federalist website, which I read and comment on almost daily. Whenever I reply to her latest bit of drivel, she says I’m obsessed and stalking her. I have tried, multiple times, to point out that I’m at that website all the time, and that is the connecting factor, not her, but feminists are immune to logic.
May 27th, 2015 @ 1:16 pm
Feminists are just a subspecies of Marxist and none of them can think with any rationality. Thomas A Mix of Vero Beach is demanding that I don’t mention his name because that is stalking. But of course he is free to repeat the defamation that I am a convicted felon and a human trafficker. The loon even has on his obsessive blog about me tht I attempted to murder my mother and was committed. So I’m not suppose to notice he repeats the lie that I was ever committed.
So becuase it annoys him to have his own stalking a defamatory posts pointed out here it is once more
https://goo.gl/e7pQyH
May 27th, 2015 @ 1:22 pm
LOL I was the freak that took every stat class there was as an undergrad. I was the only undergrad in all but my first stat class. Heck it was the only homework I coud do watching TV. I even got IBM trying to recruit me as an undergrad, But I just couldn’t move to the other coast so I turned it down
May 27th, 2015 @ 1:27 pm
LOL and just to prove my point here he is whinging that I even mention his name. So I will mention it more. Thomas A Mix of Vero Beach obsessive stalker and liar thinks someone can be sued for noticing their defamtory harassment. Useful idiot for anon creep @NicoleBonnet1!
https://goo.gl/e7pQyH
May 27th, 2015 @ 1:43 pm
It’s less exciting than one might think, anyway, lol
May 27th, 2015 @ 1:44 pm
What’s right with them??? They’re flying cockroaches, for pity’s sake!
May 27th, 2015 @ 2:07 pm
I’ve seen some big roaches, but I’ve never seen a Palmetto Bug.
May 27th, 2015 @ 2:17 pm
My girlfriend still hates the house centipedes that are common here in Georgia, because early on one landed in her hair. I made peace with them when I found out that they eat insects and spiders.
May 27th, 2015 @ 3:06 pm
[…] The Other McCain: Who Is ‘Silencing’ Whom? […]
May 27th, 2015 @ 3:27 pm
Now you need to train them to eat progressives and thing will start to look up! LOL
May 27th, 2015 @ 7:12 pm
They are the unholy spawn of satan that live in palmetto bushes in Florida, but then, for example, try to move into your house if you have an uncleared lot adjacent to you. You’re fortunate you haven’t seen them.
May 27th, 2015 @ 7:14 pm
I don’t blame your girlfriend. I, for one, want all bugs (except ladybugs) dead and gone, I don’t care about their supposed ecological benefit. We can figure something out.
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:45 pm
#%€&@!
I thought this thing of ours was all about screwing with the rest of the world, now TheOldSarge is getting it?
Is this where “male feminists” come from?
May 27th, 2015 @ 8:48 pm
I suppose that next, someone’s going to try to fool me into believing that there are womyn and gays in my beloved Marine Corps?
May 27th, 2015 @ 9:00 pm
There have long been womyn in the Corps. There have been queers too, but they weren’t quite as open about it as the womyn were.
Now, had you been smart, you wooda joined the Navy so you could ride the WAVES.
May 28th, 2015 @ 8:07 am
[…] If you call radical feminism what it is, the Godless Perverts will decide you are “no longer welcome at our meetings.” Their response to criticism is invariably to call critics “misogynists” and “rape denialists” and to accuse opponents of “harassment.” […]
May 28th, 2015 @ 8:33 am
1. The audio quality is very poor.
2. Permit me to suggest TRANSCRIBING the panel discussion and WRITING your comments.
3. As a general rule, I do not watch online video. It is simply not a time-efficient way to access information, because I can always READ faster than anyone can TALK. I believe other fluent readers are the same way. Therefore, when presenting material via video, you will always get a better reaction if you accompany it with a transcript, or with a summary that QUOTES the key parts of the discussion and provides time cues (e.g., 4:28) where the quoted material can be found.
May 28th, 2015 @ 10:18 am
This Thomas A. Mix of Vero Beach sounds very similar to a certain bomb-building low life RSM has had to deal with…
May 28th, 2015 @ 11:44 am
Makes sense, mostly. Would you care to elaborate on anti-anti- straight? Probably not as complicated as I am seeing it, but would help. Thanks.
May 28th, 2015 @ 8:59 pm
[…] If you call radical feminism what it is, the Godless Perverts will decide you are “no longer welcome at our meetings.” Their response to criticism is invariably to call critics “misogynists” and “rape denialists” and to accuse opponents of “harassment.” […]
May 29th, 2015 @ 7:48 am
I swear they must all be sharing the same brain cell
May 30th, 2015 @ 3:34 pm
[…] Who Is ‘Silencing’ Whom? Batshit Crazy News SpangNation Living In Anglo-America A View from the Beach […]
June 1st, 2015 @ 10:47 am
It seems that you don’t how recently, I got a couple of guys ousted from a Delhi Metro females-only couch, courtesy the Indian woman’r rights organisation.
Now you will be compelled to ask a stupid question – why a female-only boggy – well, the answer is if Delhi men knew how to keep their hands to themselves and glance at their own bodies rather than down a woman’s top, I would have allowed them in all coaches. But sorry, I won’t allow dirty men to get inside and touch women in wrong manner.
Those men entered a female coach and were handed over to the authorities since I raised an alarm.
On the other occasion, I nearly smacked a guy for not giving up a females-only seat in the other metro coach. Now, the question is why do we need females only seats in general coach, the reason is that pervy men can be present there too.
I will put it in the words of your famous BUT with a patriarchy ridden thought process, American astronaut, Neil Armstrong –
A small step for WOMAN, A giant leap for WOMANkind.
Despite the fact, that all Delhi subway trains have an entire coach exclusively reserved for women passengers along with many female-only seats in other general coaches too, men on several occasions have offered their seat to me which I so gladly accepted after a polite refusal the first time.
Now, if they are still dumb to offer that kind of chivalry to a modern feminist woman like me, they are the ones to be entirely blamed. I wouldnt’ be dumb enough to refuse, would I?
Actually, that chivalry is nothing but their primal desires that get ignited at the very sight of a hot single girl in a coach (which I am) and thus, they are willing to go to any lengths to satisfy them.
A gentleman doesn’t allow a lady to pay on the first date or holds door open for a woman are just mere extensions of that lustful urge that he seeks to satiate all the time.
– Rashmi S
June 1st, 2015 @ 10:59 am
So, you are a MRA from that AVFM.
It seems that you don’t how recently, I got a couple of guys ousted from a Delhi Metro females-only couch, courtesy the Indian woman’r rights organisation.
Now you will be compelled to ask a stupid question – why a female-only boggy – well, the answer is if Delhi men knew how to keep their hands to themselves and glance at their own bodies rather than down a woman’s top, I would have allowed them in all coaches. But sorry, I won’t allow dirty men to get inside and touch women in wrong manner.
Those men entered a female coach and were handed over to the authorities since I raised an alarm.
On the other occasion, I nearly smacked a guy for not giving up a females-only seat in the other metro coach. Now, the question is why do we need females only seats in general coach, the reason is that pervy men can be present there too.
I will put it in the words of your famous BUT with a patriarchy ridden thought process, American astronaut, Neil Armstrong –
A small step for WOMAN, A giant leap for WOMANkind.
Despite the fact, that all Delhi subway trains have an entire coach exclusively reserved for women passengers along with many female-only seats in other general coaches too, men on several occasions have offered their seat to me which I so gladly accepted after a polite refusal the first time.
Now, if they are still dumb to offer that kind of chivalry to a modern feminist woman like me, they are the ones to be entirely blamed. I wouldnt’ be dumb enough to refuse, would I?
Actually, that chivalry is nothing but their primal desires that get ignited at the very sight of a hot single girl in a coach (which I am) and thus, they are willing to go to any lengths to satisfy them.
A gentleman doesn’t allow a lady to pay on the first date or holds door open for a woman are just mere extensions of that lustful urge that he seeks to satiate all the time.
– Rashmi Singhania