Police: Lesbian Coach and Teenage Girl ‘Had an Ongoing Sexual Relationship’
Posted on | September 2, 2014 | 114 Comments
Leah Eames, 32, is a teacher and swim team coach at Sycamore High School in Dekalb, Illinois. On the night of August 10, a police officer checking on the YMCA “after hours found Eames working out with a student.” The circumstances were suspicious; when police checked surveillance video at the YMCA, it showed Eames and the teenage girl holding hands. Upon further investigation “police said detectives were able to identify the student and later interview her, and later discovered that Eames and the student had an ongoing sexual relationship.”
Eames was charged last week with criminal sexual assault and aggravated criminal sexual abuse. She could face up to 15 years in prison if convicted. She was placed on paid leave from her teaching job.
RECENTLY:
- July 25: Police: Lesbian Molester’s ‘Multiple Acts of Digital Penetration’ of Girl, 8
- June 16: Police: Arkansas Teacher, 57, Admits ‘Inappropriate’ Lesbian Sex With Girl, 16
- June 12: Police Arrest Teacher, Accused of Four-Year Lesbian Affair With Teen Student
- June 10: ‘The Child Within Me Is Truly Gone … I Hate You, But I Loved You’
Comments
114 Responses to “Police: Lesbian Coach and Teenage Girl ‘Had an Ongoing Sexual Relationship’”
THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD
This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog."
HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!
THE PATRIARCH TREE
Recent Posts
- Memo From the National Affairs Desk: Gilmore v. Jones, et al., Hearing
- Late Night With In The Mailbox: 11.12.18
- University Begins ‘Intersectional Diversity and Sexual Harassment Training’
- Reading Samizdat
- Anti-Trump Radical Identified as Member of Mob at Tucker Carlson’s Home
- Late NIght With Rule 5 Sunday: Nurse! Nurse!
- Democrat Election Theft Update: Pigs Don’t Fly and Questions Are Racist
- FMJRA 2.0: Back In The Saddle
- More Florida News: Democrats Send in Soros-Connected Lawyer Marc Elias
- Democrat Election Theft Update
RSS reader subscription
MEMEORANDUM
Recent Comments
- Harvard Hates Heterosexuals (Because the Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved) – Living in Anglo-America on Harvard Hates Heterosexuals (Because the Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved)
- Saturday Links | 357 Magnum on Another ‘Incel’ Weirdo: Tallahassee Shooter Was Public School Teacher
- News of the Week (November 5th, 2018) | The Political Hat on Don’t Mess With Feng Zhu Chen
- Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove on Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: Wombat Hospitalized, Could Use Your Help
- Quick Hits & Dangerous Reads (2 November 2018) | The Cercle Rouge on ‘Choose the Form of the Destructor’: #GoogleWalkout and SJW Torpedoes
THE AMAZING GONZO FEED
Search the Blog
Blog-Fu Ninja Masters
ADVERTISEMENT
Axis of Fedorables
- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechguy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Little Miss Attila
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right
AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!
Archives
- November 2018 (29)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (81)
- February 2017 (103)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (174)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (129)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)
Wombat's Wizards of Blog
SHOP NOW FOR AWESOME COMPUTER DEALS!
Can't Get Enough of That Hot Bloggy Stuff
- All-American Blogger
- American Glob
- American Power
- Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Athens & Jerusalem
- Barney Quick
- Bartholomew's Notes On Religion
- BatesLine
- Bear Creek Ledger
- Bearsears Patriots
- Blog de KingShamus
- Blueshelled
- Bride of Rove
- Cold Fury
- Dr. Helen
- Dustbury
- Five Feet of Fury
- I Own The World
- Legal Insurrection
- Little Miss Attila
- No Runny Eggs
- Obi`s Sister
- Piece of Work in Progress
- Pirates Cove
- Rhetorican
- The Conservatory
- The Sundries Shack
- VodkaPundit
- Zilla of the Resistance
Blogroll
- 90 Miles From Tyranny
- A Conservative Shemale
- AmSpec Blog
- Bad Blue
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- Calvin Freiburger Online
- Carol's Closet
- Cassy Fiano
- Catholic Bandita
- Catholic Tide
- Caught Him With A Corndog
- Cecil Calvert
- Charles G. Hill
- Clever S. Logan
- Common Cents
- Common Cents
- Conservative Girl With a Voice
- Conservative Hideout
- Conservative Watch News
- Conservatives for America
- Conservatives For Palin
- Crazy For Liberty
- Creative Minority Report
- Crush Liberalism
- Cubachi
- Cynthia Yockey
- Dad 29
- Daria DiGiovanni
- Dateline Zero
- DC Damsel
- Dr. Flap
- Dyspepsia Generation
- Effing Conservatives
- Election Dissection
- Ennui Pundit
- Eric Reasons, IT Genius
- Evil Blogger Lady
- Eye of Polyphemus
- Fausta's Blog
- Finding Ponies. . .
- Fire Andrea Mitchell
- For What It's Worth
- Founding Bloggers
- Free Will
- Funny and Jewish
- Gay Patriot
- Get Along Home
- GM's Place
- Grandpa John's
- Granite Grok
- Granny Rant
- GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
- Hit & Run
- Hoosier Access
- Hot Air Green Room
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ignorant Me
- Inside Charm City
- Is This Blog On?
- Jackie Wellfonder
- John William Perry
- Judicial Watch
- Jumping in Pools
- Katy's Conservative Corner
- KillTruck
- KURU Lounge
- Laughing Conservative
- Laura Elizabeth Morales
- Lead and Gold
- Lee Hernly
- Libertarian Republican
- Liberty Pundits
- Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
- Live Action
- Maj. Steven Givler
- Makes My Brain Itch
- Marathon Pundit
- Martin Eisenstadt's Blog
- Media Fade
- Michael Leahy
- Mind Numbed Robot
- Mister Pterodactyl
- Monique Stuart
- Morally Right
- My Blog
- My Thoughts on Freedom
- Naked Villainy
- Nathan Martin
- Never Yet Melted
- Newsreal Blog
- Nice Deb
- noot's observatory
- Not One Red Cent
- NOVA Townhall
- Ollieander
- Ordered Liberty
- Outside the Beltway
- Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar
- Pileus
- Pinup Girl
- PJ Tatler
- Point of a Gun
- Political Clown Parade
- Political Pit Bull
- Politicaljunkie Mom
- Primordial Slack
- Public Secrets
- Pundit and Pundette
- Reaganite Republican Resistance
- Red Alexandria
- Red Dog Report
- Red State Eclectic
- Red, White & Conservative
- Republican Redefined
- ResCon1
- Rhymes With Right
- Ric's Rulez
- Ricochet
- Right of Course
- Right Pundits
- Right Turns Only
- Right View From the Left Coast
- Right Wing News
- Right Wing Nut House
- Robipedia
- Robomonkey
- Ruby Slippers Blog
- Saberpoint
- Scared Monkeys
- Sentry Journal
- Serr8d's Cutting Edge
- SI VIS PACEM
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- Skepticrats
- Smash Mouth Politics
- Sooper Mexican
- Southern Maryland Online
- Soylent Green
- St. Blogustine
- Stacy on the Right
- Story Balloon
- Suzy Rice
- Taking Hayek Seriously
- Tel-Chai Nation
- Tequila & Javalinas
- That Mr. Guy
- The Aged P
- The American Catholic
- The Anchoress
- The Blogmocracy
- The Busted Nut
- The Classic Liberal
- The Daily Conservative
- The Daily Ramble
- The Daley Gator
- The Essex Blog
- The Frugal Cafe
- The Hay Ride
- The Indentured Servant Girl
- The Izzy Report
- The Jawa Report
- The Last Tradition
- The Looking Spoon
- The Minority Leader
- The Minority Report
- The NeoSexist
- The Nose on Your Face
- The Political Commentator
- The Prudence Paine Papers
- The Real Mike
- The Republican Mother
- The Right Sphere
- The Saint Angilbert Press
- The Snark Factor
- The Snooper Report
- The Tiger on Politics
- The Underground Conservative
- The View From LL2
- The Washington Rebel
- Three Beers Later
- Threedonia
- Thunder Tales
- Tigerhawk
- Tom McLaughlin
- Tory Anarchist
- TrogloPundit
- Ui2 — Informed Dissent
- Urban Grounds
- Valley of the Shadow
- Vets On The Watch
- Vox Day
- Watcher of Weasels
- Western Experience
- Wintery Knight
- Word Around the Net
- World's Only Rational Man
- WyBlog
- Yankee Phil
- Zingstrom's Blog
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:09 pm
The free market also entitles people to make trial and error with efficiency and outcomes. And it also entitles them to be inefficient or unprofitable in certain spheres if they choose to do so.
Some private entities, be they schools or whatever else, may decide they want to perform these “personality screenings” themselves and have intimate control over the process and results because they want the most possible information and control of whatever employees and outcomes. You may think that is less workable and less efficient, which may be true, but whatever private school or company may disagree and try their method. And the beauty of the free market is that one person’s notion about what is the best and most workable solution does not force other people to use only that method.
I’ve known many a corporate manager who has to outsource criminal background checks to an outside company, which will only give a “yes” or “no” answer without providing background details. They are always complaining that they want to know more details about these background checks, but corporate policy won’t allow it because of fear of litigation.
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:14 pm
No, I didn’t know that. Would it have made a difference if I said “nevertheless”?
I had to use that word to distinguish between criminal punishment and general negative life consequences, which you try to conflate. You are suggesting that because somebody ever suffers exclusion or opprobrium for their thoughts becoming known, then it constitutes “thought-crime” and wrongful persecution, which is ridiculous.
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:20 pm
Okay, so when parents judge a person by his sexuality and will not allow him to be near their children because his sexuality makes him attracted to children, they are acting as stupid as if they were “suing the Easter Bunny?”
If you are saying that certain parental decisions are stupid or unfounded, then you are saying something “about how to raise kids.”
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:23 pm
I am sorry, I do not understand your point or how that relates. Because people acknowledge groups such as parents, then defending the decisions of parents to exclude people from their children’s proximity based upon sexuality factors constitutes the exercise of force or coercion?
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:49 pm
Because (and this is the important bit)
Unless you are involved it’s none of your business.
Is it your kids? Is it kids you are related to? Is it the kids of someone you know?
You have no business judging someone’s sexuality unless there is a crime or unless you are involved.
Note the emphasis there.
You and your “aggregate judgments” have no place unless you are involved.
September 5th, 2014 @ 7:59 pm
Because you do not speak for those groups, but are all too quick to judge for them.
Even without a crime.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:02 pm
When offered a choice between an insurance company that won’t tell intimate details because you pay them or an employer, I’d choose the insurance company and another employer.
Freedom of choice, the cornerstone of the free market.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:05 pm
And I think that just about wraps it up.
You’d never agree to the same treatment that you’re so anxious to push.
That says more than I ever could.
Remember, it’s not a right unless the other guy has it too.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:12 pm
I make aggregate judgments, and so do other people, including parents. Some I may agree with, others not. Some I would condemn and some I would support. Whether I condemn or support them does not mean whatever person is not free to still make them. However, I am not obliged to stay silent about these decisions. The fact that parents and persons are free to make certain decisions does not mean those not personally involved are obliged to hold our tongues, whether we intend to say positive or negative things.
And then you say something like this: “You have no business judging someone’s sexuality unless there is a crime or unless you are involved.”
So now you add the qualifier of being involved? Well, here is another thing, I and any other person can comment on whatever policies or decisions involving what persons can have access to children, whether or not we are parents. If parents decide that they will not allow someone to be near their children because he is attracted to children, lots of people would agree with that decision and may support it and support other like-minded parents who would make the same decision. There may also be a minority of persons who disagree with that and they can voice their condemnation. Either way, the fact that they are not personally involved in the matter does not oblige them to stay silent and hold no opinion on the matter.
My personal aggregate judgments may not be personally involved, but very similar aggregate judgments may be taking place within many schools and households. Lots of parents may say they will not consider a male babysitter because they consider males less trustworthy as caregivers, and that may not be an entirely unsound decision which others may support. Excluding a pedophile from being a babysitter would seem to be a less objectionable judgment.
When this thread started, I pointed out that some people, groups, and parents might make some aggregate judgments and that these can sometimes be sensible. Then you went into your whole line about how nobody should be prohibited or excluded unless they have committed a crime or have been screened for having abusive personality. Now you qualify your line by saying that parents have the right to do so for any reason they like, but I should never comment upon this or voice support for their use of aggregate judgments in their decisions which I find sensible.
Supposedly, if we are not personally involved in something, we are obliged to only chirp your line that each person should be given the benefit of whatever doubt unless they commit a crime. Tell us another one.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:16 pm
If any parents think it is good and okay to let a pedophile babysitter their children, they may happily do so whenever they like. One even said so to Lisa Ling on “Our America.”
I do not “judge for them” but I suspect lots of them would make a certain judgment for those scenarios which I described, and I voiced my support for those who would make such a decision. That is not appointment or usurpation. That is the expression of opinion.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:27 pm
Employees would choose a lot of things, things which a lot of employers do not offer.
And some employers may say that they refuse to accept the less revealing screening from the insurance company and demand their more invasive screening.
Maybe such an employer would go out of business, or maybe these invasive employers who conduct their more intimate screenings may command more market share and influence and refusing to work for them can have bad consequences, so applicants submit to their demands. Or they may live in an area where the major employers all insist upon more invasive screenings and if you want to work in town, you must submit to that, or otherwise leave town to find work. And as we have seen with the rise of corporate espionage and employee surveillance, employers sometimes crave intimate information about their employees.
September 5th, 2014 @ 8:36 pm
All people face that treatment in one way or another, not just persons with disfavored sexualities. People refuse to associate or let their children associate with other people because of their religion or political beliefs or sexuality. I believe that people have the right to not associate with people or bar people from their private spaces for whatever reason or no reason. That means people can exclude me for any reason or no reason, and I can do the same. I have the right and the other guy has it too. Neither me nor the other guy has to wait until we have evidence of a crime.
But while we are on the subject of people who are sexually attracted to children, so of them do admit that they should not be around children or have children under their supervision, for both their safety and the children’s safety. That is a sensible concession.
September 5th, 2014 @ 9:17 pm
The question of statistical prevalence would be interesting to know, but is in some ways irrelevant. I do not doubt that most victims of sexual abuse by coaches and teachers involves girls abused by males. But sexual abuse by females in positions of trust — regardless of whether their victims are girls or boys — contradicts the common assumption that women “aren’t like that,” and that women can therefore always be trusted with the care and supervision of minors.
And the media have a HUGE blind spot toward same-sex abuse, which is never labeled “gay” or “lesbian” because …
Well, why? It is simply that the media have become public-relations agents for homosexuality, and therefore don’t want to encourage “prejudice” — because, as everybody knows FACTS are the New Hate.
September 7th, 2014 @ 9:41 am
[…] bloggers didn’t notice that story, for some reason. And they don’t care about lesbian coaches molesting girls, […]