The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus

Posted on | November 15, 2013 | 72 Comments

“Feminism is the theory; lesbianism is the practice.”
Ti-Grace Atkinson, 1971

“The political economy of socialist feminism establishes that, in contemporary society, women suffer a special form of exploitation and oppression.”
Allison Jaggar, 1988

“Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.”
Andrea Dworkin, 1989

Professional athletes can spawn with multiple baby mamas, and feminists have no word of complaint. Gay men hiring surrogates to breed children for them? Lesbians raising adopted child sex-change experiments? No problem, say the Womyn’s Studies majors. In response to the general plague of divorce and fatherlessness, the poverty-inducing epidemic of illegitimacy that replicates underclass misery, the collective reaction of the Official Women’s Movement is . . . crickets chirping.

However, let a normal couple of married Christians give birth to more than the standard 1.7 children, and they become the targets of seething rage and resentment from the feminist Left. You saw this attitude exemplified in the hysterical reaction to Sarah Palin who, by giving birth to five children, was made the object of fathomless hatred. “For many liberal women, Palin threatens their sexual identity, which is bound up with their politics,” as James Taranto observed.

It is this same feminist fanaticism that explains the hateful campaign against the Duggar family and their TV show, “19 Kids and Counting.” Dana Pico at First Street Journal remarks:

The Duggars are the “stars” of the TLC network reality series, 19 Kids and Counting. Predictably, our friends on the left hate them: see Jezebel and Jenna Karvunidis and Bitch Magazine (check out the comments!) and, of course! Amanda Marcotte. It’s pretty simple: if your choices aren’t their choices, then your choices are wrong, illegitimate, and societally harmful. It’s not like they are actually killing anyone, and the Duggars are self-supporting, taxpaying Americans; they aren’t on welfare.
RH Reality Check thinks that it’s horrible, horrible! that Mr Duggar referenced the Holocaust, and you know, I agree: Holocaust references by pro-life groups are inappropriate. After all, the Holocaust killed only six million people, and is nowhere in our abortuaries’ league when it comes to dealing out death.

It is shocking how fanatically devoted some people are to the “right” of abortion. Doug Hagin at Daley Gator explains:

I used to try to talk sense to pro-abortion people on message boards. . . . I found out they too believe it is a baby, and they revel in the “right” to destroy it. To them, a woman is not whole unless she can have her baby executed in the womb. How depraved are they? Well, consider many of the regularly compared unborn babies to parasites, and cancerous tumors, yes really.

Such unspeakable hatred toward human life is rooted in a radical ideology that views the culture and institutions of traditional morality and family life as part of an oppressive bourgeois capitalist system which they — the feminists — must destroy.

It is not just marriage and motherhood, but also religion, patriotism and all notions of virtue, honor and decency associated with those concepts which are the targets of cultural destruction by feminists and the larger radical movement to which feminists belong. You might think there is some reasonable limit to what feminists would endorse in pursuit of this agenda, but hate is irrational and radicalism knows no limit. So when a Canadian provincial government publishes “Children’s Sexual Behaviours: A Parent’s Guide,” which tells parents that it is “natural and healthy” for young children to “touch the ‘private parts’ of familiar adults” and to look at “nude pictures on the Internet, videos, magazines,” we get the expected reaction from feminists: Crickets chirping.

Why the silence? Because the Left is willing to “normalize pedophilia” as part of its “ongoing effort to rid the world of Judeo/Christian influences,” as Matt Ross says. The failure to understand the Left’s revolutionary ambitions leads to a sonambulant indifference to the Left’s declarations of its beliefs, its methods and its purposes.

“Childlike innocence is an invention of the bourgeoisie of early capitalism.”
Olaf Stüben, German pedophile activist, 1981

While advocating the perverse, abnormal and deviant as “rights,” the Left simultaneously attacks the wholesome and decent, so a married Christian couple like the Duggars must be stigmatized as part of the Left’s larger project, which one of their leaders described as “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

Every day brings new headlines heralding the Left’s success at destroying the moral foundation of our nation’s culture.

Why Did a Public University Pay
Dan Savage to Talk About Sex?

That’s a good question: Why would the University of Oregon bring a notorious anti-Christian speaker like Dan Savage to campus?

Why not bring the Duggar family to campus instead?

MSNBC Guest: Abortionists Are
“Doing Wonderful, Important Work”

MSNBC would never say the Duggars are “doing wonderful, important work,” because the Duggars are Christians and MSNBC hates Jesus.

 

Comments

72 Responses to “Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus”

  1. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 4:54 am

    And many socons stay home and don’t vote… It’s hard to say who’s the “cleverer”…

  2. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 4:55 am

    And decent and wholesome too

  3. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 4:58 am

    I don’t think Dworkin was that good in social critique, but her main point was against violence against women, especially sexual violence. And there’s plenty to be said in that regard. There are many types of marriages that were horrible, and some continue to be so.

  4. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 5:05 am

    I wouldn’t say they are unhappy. Many are happy in a twisted way. They are like pedophiles acting with impunity. They are happy in their dysfunctional and parasitic lifestyles. It’s not a wholesome kind of happy, but it gives them pleasure.

    What they don’t want is anyone holding them accountable for anything. They also don’t want anyone else to realize their lifestyles are quite bad, even if they, thanks to their warped minds, may enjoy it.
    A lot of perverted people get a twisted pleasure out of their perversions. That’s basically what all these LGBT trash of people do nowadays. Likewise for rapists, many drug users and people who get drunk.

  5. ZION'S TRUMPET » Large Families are Evil, Let’s Kill Some More Babies, and MSNBC hates Jesus.
    November 16th, 2013 @ 7:29 am

    […] Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus […]

  6. McGehee
    November 16th, 2013 @ 9:02 am

    Many socons are tired of being told to shut up and vote for Republican liberals.

  7. rsmccain
    November 16th, 2013 @ 10:23 am

    RT @sokeijarhead: Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus : The Other McCain http://t.co/1mwICEcMHL

  8. rsmccain
    November 16th, 2013 @ 10:24 am

    RT @Citzcom: Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus: “Feminism is the theory; lesbianism is the practice.” – Ti-Grace Atkinso… http://t.co/…

  9. PensativeGuy
    November 16th, 2013 @ 10:46 am

    RT @Citzcom: Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus: “Feminism is the theory; lesbianism is the practice.” – Ti-Grace Atkinso… http://t.co/…

  10. shansmith
    November 16th, 2013 @ 11:01 am

    Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus http://t.co/bctPXidL5c

  11. Quartermaster
    November 16th, 2013 @ 11:45 am

    I agree. I was responding in the same context as the earlier post.

  12. J
    November 16th, 2013 @ 12:17 pm

    I am Israeli and I can tell you that the Left has a plan, like in other countries: import new voters, mostly from poor countries. Guess who they would vote for.

  13. Worc1
    November 16th, 2013 @ 1:00 pm

    Why is it that feminists are so freaking ugly? Is it they are born that way and unable to get a man so then they blame men for their sorry ass lives of loneliness and despair and find comfort in the arms of other feminist ugo’s.

  14. Michael Adams
    November 16th, 2013 @ 1:53 pm

    I would not mind the Left’s goal of seeking to destroy the bourgeoisie, if they were not so adamant that we pay for it.

  15. ThePoliticalHat
    November 16th, 2013 @ 5:13 pm

    Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus http://t.co/99SfMCRRnU | #tcot #tpp

  16. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 5:19 pm

    🙂

    I think they have overtaken and are now gleefully leading the bourgeoisie, intoxicated with themselves… having sold out on all their objections once they tasted bourgeois life

  17. Alessandra
    November 16th, 2013 @ 5:21 pm

    And yet, if they had ALL voted, Kagan wouldn’t be there, and neither would Obama…
    I understand that they are tired, but I think they are only making things worse by not voting. Or they can create a third party.
    Doing nothing is the worse.

  18. McGehee
    November 16th, 2013 @ 6:57 pm

    You’re overlooking that the here and now is less important to many socons than the hereafter. As bad as things are, at least they’re not being thrown to the lions (yet).

    And even when they were being thrown to the lions, Christians were never called to overthrow the regime that was doing it.

  19. News of the Week (November 17th, 2013) | The Political Hat
    November 17th, 2013 @ 7:52 pm

    […] Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus Professional athletes can spawn with multiple baby mamas, and feminists have no word of complaint. Gay men hiring surrogates to breed children for them? Lesbians raising adopted child sex-change experiments? No problem, say the Womyn’s Studies majors. In response to the general plague of divorce and fatherlessness, the poverty-inducing epidemic of illegitimacy that replicates underclass misery, the collective reaction of the Official Women’s Movement is . . . crickets chirping. […]

  20. News of the Week (November 17th, 2013) | The Political Hat
    November 17th, 2013 @ 7:52 pm

    […] Feminists Fear the Republican Uterus Professional athletes can spawn with multiple baby mamas, and feminists have no word of complaint. Gay men hiring surrogates to breed children for them? Lesbians raising adopted child sex-change experiments? No problem, say the Womyn’s Studies majors. In response to the general plague of divorce and fatherlessness, the poverty-inducing epidemic of illegitimacy that replicates underclass misery, the collective reaction of the Official Women’s Movement is . . . crickets chirping. […]

  21. Alessandra
    November 19th, 2013 @ 4:31 am

    Hyperbolic much? “Going out to vote” is now “overthrowing the regime”? I wish it were that easy to overthrow regimes! 🙂

    Colluding with, supporting, and doing evil is a sin. Obviously many socons aren’t in the least concerned with how much they sin, or they wouldn’t be irresponsible, or negligent, or collusive with evil in the political or the personal sphere.

  22. The Intolerance Towards Normalcy | The Political Hat
    November 22nd, 2013 @ 4:50 am

    […]      This hatred for what was once considered “normal” is wide spread.  A lesbian couple trying to transform an adopted son into an adopted daughter is considered liberating, but when that ideology of transsexualism leads to tragedy, it is at best ignored.  A gay couple raising a child is lauded as wonderful, but a conservative straight couple raising a child is condemned and even effectively prohibited exercising the same legal right as a gay couple — adopting and raising a child.  As Robert Stacy McCain noted: […]