The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

More #FreeKate Arguments: Want to Let Heather Wirth-Dalager Babysit Your Kids?

Posted on | August 21, 2013 | 143 Comments

Kaitlyn Hunt’s got a fever, and
jailbait poontang is the only cure!

That’s really the core of the “Free Kate” argument and, again, if you watched yesterday’s hearing where Kate’s bail was revoked, you understand this argument carries no weight in Florida courts. Kaitlyn Hunt is guilty and belongs in jail, and the fact that prosecutors were willing to offer her a plea deal — even after her violations of the no-contact order were discovered — ought to be understood as a humane effort to avoid a trial that would require that the underage victim be compelled to testify about their sordid and perverse relationship.

No sane or decent person ever supported the “Free Kate” movement, and only the most indecent and insane fanatics continue to support Kaitlyn Hunt now that her deviant criminality has been demonstrated by evidence that Judge Pegg called “overwhelming.”

“Free Kate” supporters are amoral scum with no sense of shame, nor do they have any respect for law or understanding of basic logic. Where only bad arguments are possible — because all the good arguments are for Kaitlyn Hunt’s conviction — one becomes accustomed to dishonest blame-shifting. Heather Wirth-Dalager:

This is a variation of an argument “Free Kate” supporters have made for the past three months: The problem is not that Kaitlyn Hunt broke the law; the problem is that somebody called the cops.

Really, it’s just Thug Logic: “Snitches get stitches.”

The argument from Heather Wirth-Dalager is a bit more nuanced than that, but boiled down to its essence, that’s it:

I am curious what the teacher who violated these teenage girls privacy by announcing this relationship to the younger girls parents, kicked Kate of the team, and facilitated Kate being expelled from school is thinking now? . . . .

(My guess: She’s probably thinking you need to improve your punctuation and syntax.)

Sounds like a strong discrimination suit against the school district and this teacher personally due to these girls sexual orientation!!

(That required two exclamation marks!!)

Regardless of this ludicrous law that doesn’t protect kids in this age group, punishing someone for that in and of itself is simply wrong.  This isn’t just a case about same sex relationships, its discrimination and seems to hold some strong privacy violations as well, a doctor would be bound to privacy due to HIPPA Laws based on these girls ages, why does the school have the ability to release anything to the younger girls parents about Kate’s sexual orientation or about Kate at all? . . .

(Translation: “If a lesbian wants to play Spin the Dildo with your 14-year-old daughter, it is ‘discrimination’ and ‘privacy violations’ for anyone to tell you what’s going on, because ‘sexual orientation’ means that the law against having sex with 14-year-olds is ‘ludicrous.'” Does that argument make sense to you? If so, seek psychiatric help immediately.)

We need to remember these are CHILDREN even at 18 years old and still in high school, they do not carry the life experiences to understand ALL consequences of a relationship. . . .

(In case the double exclamation marks weren’t helping, now she’s going to CAPITALIZE random WORDS, and hope you don’t notice the inherent contradiction of her argument. Heather Wirth-Dalager thinks it’s OK for a 14-year-old to be having sex, and “ludicrous” that the law should forbid it. Yet at the same time, while she argues that minors deserve no legal protection against being sexually exploited by adults, she also argues that 18-year-olds are just children — CHILDREN — who are so naive they can’t be expected to understand consequences. Again, if her argument makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately.)

These young girls will probably never trust an authority figure again in their lives and especially the younger girl who will have life long emotional damage from the actions of first the teacher/coach that they trusted, the school for punishing them for being individuals and their sexual orientation, her parents for trying to fore her out of a situation with someone she cared about, and then the law which is supposed to protect her and has grossly failed to do so.

Well, there you have it, eh? “Authentic frontier gibberish.”

Apparently, in Heather Wirth-Dalager’s demented mind, finger-sex in the school restroom toilet stall is just “being individuals.” Also, according to  Heather Wirth-Dalager, running away from home to spend the night satisfying the lusts of a dildo-wielding pervert doesn’t cause nearly as much “emotional damage” for a 14-year-old as having her tattoo-covered lesbian partner get arrested for her crimes.

Because “sexual orientation” and “privacy,” you see.

Also, if you ever decide to record a video of yourself masturbating and want to send it to a 15-year-old girl, Heather Wirth-Dalager would be OK with that. You’re just “being individuals,” right?

 

 


Category: Kaitlyn Hunt

Comments

143 Responses to “More #FreeKate Arguments: Want to Let Heather Wirth-Dalager Babysit Your Kids?”

  1. Matthew W
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:24 pm

    “the teacher who violated these teenage girls privacy”

    What law school did this brain stem drop out of?

  2. Matthew W
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:26 pm

    No, she was sired by Otis the drunk and the goat that ate the dynamite.

  3. richard mcenroe
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:32 pm

    You realize if e.e. cummings lived today, his tweets would be grammatically perfect just to bug people.

  4. Laura_PH
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:34 pm

    RT @rsmccain: Would You Let a #FreeKate Supporter Babysit Your Kids? http://t.co/AdLirMMUlW | @Laura_PH @Jeanette_Runyon @sjreidhead @NASCA…

  5. Kirby McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:35 pm

    She said her ex was a regular in some jail voluntarily.

  6. Matthew W
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:35 pm

    BUT !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    To the Katers, there was nothing to be reported.

  7. concern00
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:44 pm

    Pure evil!

  8. Kirby McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:49 pm

    Us men have long been suspicious of what was going on in the ladies room. How ya’ll go to the bathroom together and it takes forever. Geez! The Kaitlyn Hunt saga has exposed the dark side of the ladies room.

  9. Joy W. McCann
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:55 pm

    I’m sorry, but this is in fact a run-on: “Having to read that bit of squirrel logic was bad enough, however the
    lack of punctuation, lack of indentation, and run on sentences was more
    then I can bear.”

    Furthermore, that “can” ought to be a “could,” for tense consistency.

    If I didn’t consider blasphemy against the Holy Spirit a sin, I’d suggest that He inserts errors into our prose every now and then to keep us humble . . . right as we are in the process of attacking others’ troubled syntax.

  10. Media Covers for #FreeKate While Her Supporters Attack the Victim’s Parents : The Other McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:56 pm

    […] you thought it was rhetorical overkill when I called Kaitlyn’s supporters “amoral scum with no sense of shame,” But do you see the twisted worldview of these people? Do you see how they admire everything […]

  11. BeccaJLower
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:57 pm

    If #FreeKate zombie Heather Wirth-Dalager makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately! http://t.co/Jd6ANcUaXg via @rsmccain #tcot

  12. Kirby McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:58 pm

    Do I want to let this woman babysit my children?

    Stacy, I’d have to see more pictures of her.

  13. OwainPenllyn
    August 21st, 2013 @ 6:59 pm

    RT @BeccaJLower: If #FreeKate zombie Heather Wirth-Dalager makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately! http://t.co/Jd6ANcUaXg vi…

  14. rsmccain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 7:01 pm

    RT @BeccaJLower: If #FreeKate zombie Heather Wirth-Dalager makes sense to you, seek psychiatric help immediately! http://t.co/Jd6ANcUaXg vi…

  15. Becca Lower
    August 21st, 2013 @ 7:33 pm

    You’d all be nothing without TWYB, and you know it deep down in your hearts! 😉

  16. Becca Lower
    August 21st, 2013 @ 7:37 pm

    The dirty little secret (pardon the pun) of most bestsellers is that people buy them and never read them. They just want to be like everyone else. Pays the same for the publisher, though.

  17. Becca Lower
    August 21st, 2013 @ 7:42 pm

    Love that, Katers. heehee

  18. richard mcenroe
    August 21st, 2013 @ 7:54 pm

    If she doesn’t want to, she wants to make it possible. Close enough for government work.

  19. rmnixondeceased
    August 21st, 2013 @ 8:20 pm

    Heh

  20. BobBelvedere
    August 21st, 2013 @ 8:20 pm

    RT @rsmccain: Would You Let a #FreeKate Supporter Babysit Your Kids? http://t.co/AdLirMMUlW | @Laura_PH @Jeanette_Runyon @sjreidhead @NASCA…

  21. rmnixondeceased
    August 21st, 2013 @ 8:21 pm

    +1 for Andy Griffith Show reference …

  22. Finrod Felagund
    August 21st, 2013 @ 8:45 pm

    The thing about 50 Shades is: the BDSM crowd hates that book and the whole culture around it with a burning passion. It glorifies blatantly unsafe practices like ignoring safewords and glamorizes an emotionally abusive relationship, which is everything that BDSM culture stands against (common motto: safe, sane and consensual).

  23. Finrod Felagund
    August 21st, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

    True story: 50 Shades started off as Twilight fanfic.

  24. Bob Belvedere
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:10 pm

    No — a federal law!
    RINO!

  25. Bob Belvedere
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:13 pm

    She would have been locked-up in a mental ward.

  26. Matthew W
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:13 pm

    Bad Daddy !!!!

  27. Wombat_socho
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:20 pm

    This place makes Mos Eisley look like fricking Monaco by comparison.

  28. Kirby McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:20 pm

    He asked.

  29. #FreeKate Update: Announcement from Lawyer and Statements of Supporters Give Insight Into #FreeKate Mindset - Conservative Hideout 2.0
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:25 pm

    […] Now, here is a comment from a supporter… […]

  30. Jason Lee
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:29 pm

    Privacy? Libs are still clinging to privacy arguments? In the age of Obama, I didn’t know privacy was still a thing. #NSA #TSA #etc

  31. Kirby McCain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:36 pm

    It’s fair to attack the evidence or the credibility of a witness. But going after the victim’s family is repugnant. I’m not sure how the court could ignore this. I see no other purpose for such a statement other than to silence the victim.

  32. robertstacymccain
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:37 pm

    Exactly. Kinda like Bill Schmalfeldt, really.

  33. bet0001970
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:45 pm

    McCain, I think this qualifies for “UPDATE” status.

  34. bet0001970
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:49 pm

    Funny…I was just about to post this.

  35. RightKlik
    August 21st, 2013 @ 9:52 pm

    Libs still cling to privacy arguments? In the Obama era, I didn’t know privacy was still a thing: http://t.co/1CX6CpJBpR #NSA h/t @rsmccain

  36. Funeral guy
    August 21st, 2013 @ 10:46 pm

    I can’t believe it! A respectful exchange. On the Internet! My hat is off to both of you.

  37. Funeral guy
    August 21st, 2013 @ 10:54 pm

    This Graves person, is she gay? I’m only asking because that would certainly explain the particular zeal with which she’s going after the victim’s (Christian) parents.

  38. K-Bob
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 3:03 am

    Whoah, that explains a lot. He humiliates me by making me go back and insert errors in my prose. Otherwise everyone would think I’m a smartass or something.

  39. K-Bob
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 3:03 am

    K8trs!

  40. K-Bob
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 3:42 am

    I denounce myself.

  41. K-Bob
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 3:42 am

    It’s the band.

  42. RhymesWithRight
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 7:12 am

    If Florida is like most other states, the only thing done wrong by the teacher may have been her decision to report the matter to the victim’s parents rather than to Child Protective Services and/or the police. After all, there is a statutory obligation to report the sexual abuse/exploitation of a minor to the authorities.

  43. Becca Lower
    August 22nd, 2013 @ 12:51 pm

    As well you should!