Is Your Child’s Public School Teacher Cruising Online for a ‘Sugar Daddy’?
Posted on | August 18, 2013 | 128 Comments
Reading, writing and rent-a-dates:
SeekingArrangement.com, which bills itself as “the #1 online dating website for sugar babies and generous men,” is now boasting that some 40,000 public school teachers of a certain moral caliber have joined the website in an attempt to . . . seek wealthy, older men for “mutually beneficial relationships.” . . .
According to SeekingArrangement, the top five school districts in the country for sugar-baby teachers are (in order): the School District of Philadelphia, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Los Angeles Unified School District, the Clark County School District (in the Las Vegas area) and the New York City public schools.
Why aren’t you home-schooling yet?
Comments
128 Responses to “Is Your Child’s Public School Teacher Cruising Online for a ‘Sugar Daddy’?”
THE FULL METAL JACKET REACH-AROUND AWARD
This spot rotates to honor those who link us in shameless obedience to Rule 2 of "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog."
HIT THE FREAKING TIP JAR!
THE PATRIARCH TREE
Recent Posts
- Memo From the National Affairs Desk: Gilmore v. Jones, et al., Hearing
- Late Night With In The Mailbox: 11.12.18
- University Begins ‘Intersectional Diversity and Sexual Harassment Training’
- Reading Samizdat
- Anti-Trump Radical Identified as Member of Mob at Tucker Carlson’s Home
- Late NIght With Rule 5 Sunday: Nurse! Nurse!
- Democrat Election Theft Update: Pigs Don’t Fly and Questions Are Racist
- FMJRA 2.0: Back In The Saddle
- More Florida News: Democrats Send in Soros-Connected Lawyer Marc Elias
- Democrat Election Theft Update
RSS reader subscription
MEMEORANDUM
Recent Comments
- Harvard Hates Heterosexuals (Because the Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved) – Living in Anglo-America on Harvard Hates Heterosexuals (Because the Ivy League Is Decadent and Depraved)
- Saturday Links | 357 Magnum on Another ‘Incel’ Weirdo: Tallahassee Shooter Was Public School Teacher
- News of the Week (November 5th, 2018) | The Political Hat on Don’t Mess With Feng Zhu Chen
- Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove on Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: Wombat Hospitalized, Could Use Your Help
- Quick Hits & Dangerous Reads (2 November 2018) | The Cercle Rouge on ‘Choose the Form of the Destructor’: #GoogleWalkout and SJW Torpedoes
THE AMAZING GONZO FEED
Search the Blog
Blog-Fu Ninja Masters
ADVERTISEMENT
Axis of Fedorables
- All-American Girl for the Restoration of Values
- Allergic to Bull
- Cat House Chat
- Chris Cassone
- Conservative Daily News
- DaTechguy
- Fishersville Mike
- Girl on the Right
- Haemet
- Just A Conservative Girl
- Little Miss Attila
- Marooned in Marin
- Paco Enterprises
- So It Goes In Shreveport
- SWAC Girl
- The (Perhaps Slightly Less) Lonely Conservative
- The Camp of the Saints
- The World's Youngest Blogger
- Uncoverage
- VA Right
AMAZING SAVINGS NOW!
Archives
- November 2018 (29)
- October 2018 (96)
- September 2018 (79)
- August 2018 (107)
- July 2018 (98)
- June 2018 (86)
- May 2018 (78)
- April 2018 (78)
- March 2018 (97)
- February 2018 (61)
- January 2018 (70)
- December 2017 (62)
- November 2017 (68)
- October 2017 (67)
- September 2017 (70)
- August 2017 (68)
- July 2017 (52)
- June 2017 (60)
- May 2017 (56)
- April 2017 (80)
- March 2017 (81)
- February 2017 (103)
- January 2017 (104)
- December 2016 (65)
- November 2016 (86)
- October 2016 (77)
- September 2016 (81)
- August 2016 (66)
- July 2016 (83)
- June 2016 (81)
- May 2016 (65)
- April 2016 (64)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (74)
- January 2016 (66)
- December 2015 (64)
- November 2015 (85)
- October 2015 (71)
- September 2015 (80)
- August 2015 (67)
- July 2015 (79)
- June 2015 (69)
- May 2015 (72)
- April 2015 (94)
- March 2015 (122)
- February 2015 (71)
- January 2015 (93)
- December 2014 (99)
- November 2014 (67)
- October 2014 (109)
- September 2014 (87)
- August 2014 (106)
- July 2014 (132)
- June 2014 (154)
- May 2014 (126)
- April 2014 (145)
- March 2014 (144)
- February 2014 (142)
- January 2014 (185)
- December 2013 (192)
- November 2013 (174)
- October 2013 (175)
- September 2013 (181)
- August 2013 (172)
- July 2013 (147)
- June 2013 (135)
- May 2013 (129)
- April 2013 (105)
- March 2013 (162)
- February 2013 (191)
- January 2013 (206)
- December 2012 (190)
- November 2012 (176)
- October 2012 (240)
- September 2012 (206)
- August 2012 (235)
- July 2012 (223)
- June 2012 (161)
- May 2012 (230)
- April 2012 (269)
- March 2012 (282)
- February 2012 (247)
- January 2012 (267)
- December 2011 (285)
- November 2011 (300)
- October 2011 (302)
- September 2011 (297)
- August 2011 (288)
- July 2011 (297)
- June 2011 (245)
- May 2011 (260)
- April 2011 (344)
- March 2011 (293)
- February 2011 (201)
- January 2011 (263)
- December 2010 (265)
- November 2010 (266)
- October 2010 (305)
- September 2010 (280)
- August 2010 (272)
- July 2010 (230)
- June 2010 (244)
- May 2010 (256)
- April 2010 (222)
- March 2010 (271)
- February 2010 (286)
- January 2010 (229)
- December 2009 (21)
- October 2009 (1)
Wombat's Wizards of Blog
SHOP NOW FOR AWESOME COMPUTER DEALS!
Can't Get Enough of That Hot Bloggy Stuff
- All-American Blogger
- American Glob
- American Power
- Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Athens & Jerusalem
- Barney Quick
- Bartholomew's Notes On Religion
- BatesLine
- Bear Creek Ledger
- Bearsears Patriots
- Blog de KingShamus
- Blueshelled
- Bride of Rove
- Cold Fury
- Dr. Helen
- Dustbury
- Five Feet of Fury
- I Own The World
- Legal Insurrection
- Little Miss Attila
- No Runny Eggs
- Obi`s Sister
- Piece of Work in Progress
- Pirates Cove
- Rhetorican
- The Conservatory
- The Sundries Shack
- VodkaPundit
- Zilla of the Resistance
Blogroll
- 90 Miles From Tyranny
- A Conservative Shemale
- AmSpec Blog
- Bad Blue
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- Calvin Freiburger Online
- Carol's Closet
- Cassy Fiano
- Catholic Bandita
- Catholic Tide
- Caught Him With A Corndog
- Cecil Calvert
- Charles G. Hill
- Clever S. Logan
- Common Cents
- Common Cents
- Conservative Girl With a Voice
- Conservative Hideout
- Conservative Watch News
- Conservatives for America
- Conservatives For Palin
- Crazy For Liberty
- Creative Minority Report
- Crush Liberalism
- Cubachi
- Cynthia Yockey
- Dad 29
- Daria DiGiovanni
- Dateline Zero
- DC Damsel
- Dr. Flap
- Dyspepsia Generation
- Effing Conservatives
- Election Dissection
- Ennui Pundit
- Eric Reasons, IT Genius
- Evil Blogger Lady
- Eye of Polyphemus
- Fausta's Blog
- Finding Ponies. . .
- Fire Andrea Mitchell
- For What It's Worth
- Founding Bloggers
- Free Will
- Funny and Jewish
- Gay Patriot
- Get Along Home
- GM's Place
- Grandpa John's
- Granite Grok
- Granny Rant
- GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
- Hit & Run
- Hoosier Access
- Hot Air Green Room
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ignorant Me
- Inside Charm City
- Is This Blog On?
- Jackie Wellfonder
- John William Perry
- Judicial Watch
- Jumping in Pools
- Katy's Conservative Corner
- KillTruck
- KURU Lounge
- Laughing Conservative
- Laura Elizabeth Morales
- Lead and Gold
- Lee Hernly
- Libertarian Republican
- Liberty Pundits
- Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
- Live Action
- Maj. Steven Givler
- Makes My Brain Itch
- Marathon Pundit
- Martin Eisenstadt's Blog
- Media Fade
- Michael Leahy
- Mind Numbed Robot
- Mister Pterodactyl
- Monique Stuart
- Morally Right
- My Blog
- My Thoughts on Freedom
- Naked Villainy
- Nathan Martin
- Never Yet Melted
- Newsreal Blog
- Nice Deb
- noot's observatory
- Not One Red Cent
- NOVA Townhall
- Ollieander
- Ordered Liberty
- Outside the Beltway
- Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar
- Pileus
- Pinup Girl
- PJ Tatler
- Point of a Gun
- Political Clown Parade
- Political Pit Bull
- Politicaljunkie Mom
- Primordial Slack
- Public Secrets
- Pundit and Pundette
- Reaganite Republican Resistance
- Red Alexandria
- Red Dog Report
- Red State Eclectic
- Red, White & Conservative
- Republican Redefined
- ResCon1
- Rhymes With Right
- Ric's Rulez
- Ricochet
- Right of Course
- Right Pundits
- Right Turns Only
- Right View From the Left Coast
- Right Wing News
- Right Wing Nut House
- Robipedia
- Robomonkey
- Ruby Slippers Blog
- Saberpoint
- Scared Monkeys
- Sentry Journal
- Serr8d's Cutting Edge
- SI VIS PACEM
- Sissy 'put moi in your blogroll' Willis
- Skepticrats
- Smash Mouth Politics
- Sooper Mexican
- Southern Maryland Online
- Soylent Green
- St. Blogustine
- Stacy on the Right
- Story Balloon
- Suzy Rice
- Taking Hayek Seriously
- Tel-Chai Nation
- Tequila & Javalinas
- That Mr. Guy
- The Aged P
- The American Catholic
- The Anchoress
- The Blogmocracy
- The Busted Nut
- The Classic Liberal
- The Daily Conservative
- The Daily Ramble
- The Daley Gator
- The Essex Blog
- The Frugal Cafe
- The Hay Ride
- The Indentured Servant Girl
- The Izzy Report
- The Jawa Report
- The Last Tradition
- The Looking Spoon
- The Minority Leader
- The Minority Report
- The NeoSexist
- The Nose on Your Face
- The Political Commentator
- The Prudence Paine Papers
- The Real Mike
- The Republican Mother
- The Right Sphere
- The Saint Angilbert Press
- The Snark Factor
- The Snooper Report
- The Tiger on Politics
- The Underground Conservative
- The View From LL2
- The Washington Rebel
- Three Beers Later
- Threedonia
- Thunder Tales
- Tigerhawk
- Tom McLaughlin
- Tory Anarchist
- TrogloPundit
- Ui2 — Informed Dissent
- Urban Grounds
- Valley of the Shadow
- Vets On The Watch
- Vox Day
- Watcher of Weasels
- Western Experience
- Wintery Knight
- Word Around the Net
- World's Only Rational Man
- WyBlog
- Yankee Phil
- Zingstrom's Blog
August 19th, 2013 @ 9:00 am
Now that is interesting. I don’t agree, but it’s certainly interesting.
I do agree that they might be foolish (obviously it depends on who is involved), but I also say that freedom means making mistakes and learning to deal with the consequences.
Take away that choice and you deprive that person.
August 19th, 2013 @ 9:11 am
The teachers in the classic 1-8 grade, one room school houses were single, female high school graduates. States began creating “Normal Schools” for teacher education beginning in the 20th Century. That was a time when an 8th grade education was the norm, and not many people went to high school. That’s why we still have 8th grade graduation. It’s an artifact from those earlier times.
August 19th, 2013 @ 9:15 am
Incorrect conclusion. No one wanted to live under the rules of an official state church but they believed that everyone should live under the rules of their own church, i.e., have a moral foundation.
Very astute to cherry-pick the documents for your example rather than discuss an awareness from reading ALL of the documents written by the founders. By cherry-picking facts and documents, I can prove that you are a hermophriditic dwarf who worships Kali and is left-handed. That is called intellectual dishonesty, a practice you just engaged in.
I tire of your assclownish behavior, unless you can post an honest and factual comment, I shall ignore all future comments from you on this thread.
August 19th, 2013 @ 9:17 am
My own father had an 8th grade education. He began working immediately upon graduation and remained employed until his death.
August 19th, 2013 @ 9:52 am
Look again.
The English Civil War and the religious squabbles between the colonies were still fresh in their minds.
Some did think that a state religion was a good idea. They just didn’t agree on which one.
And yes, some thought that an individual relationship with the Divine was more important than any church or institution. I thoroughly approve of that idea, BTW.
I picked the documents I did precisely because they were the end products. You don’t have to have the whole of English literature to appreciate Mark Twain or David Weber. The DOI and the Constitution stand on their own, the “source documents” do not.
August 19th, 2013 @ 3:56 pm
[…] Is Your Child’s Public School Teacher Cruising Online for a ‘Sugar Daddy’? […]
August 20th, 2013 @ 1:00 am
You think you have proven something by not having proven anything? You need to work on your definition of “proven.”
It’s not what you think it is.
I have already proven you wrong and I’m just getting more proof of it right now.
I asked you to show me where anyone on this site said that “perverted” equals “Italian immigrants” – your claim written just a scroll above, remember? Or the “music of Elvis Presley” or the writings of Whitman, or equality between men and women. Alas, I see no proof of anything.
I also don’t see any proof on your part about anyone’s definition of perversion here being dependent on some kind of unwarranted and temporary question of convenience.
Having unequal rights for women is perverted, but it is not equal to sexual perversion. Racism is perverted, but it is not sexual perversion. You’re just obessessed in lying about what sexual perversion refers to. As I have already pointed it out, for a pervert, as you keep proving, nothing is perverted – whether we are talking about sexual or non-sexual perversions – that is your working and stated definition. Denial at all costs.
As it’s clear, your objective here is to stereotype conservatives in a way to malign them and to smear them, while being in denial about how sexually deformed and perverted so many people in society are.
August 20th, 2013 @ 1:21 am
Are you too dense to realize that sexuality and relationships involve a lot more than adults and “consenting” adults?
So sexuality and relationships is everybody’s business exactly because of how much harm people do in society in these spheres. And harm is society’s business.
And it’s exactly in the minds of what you call “consenting” adults that the ideas for harmful and non-consensual activities are hatched. As was pointed out in another thread recently, the majority of harassful and abusive acts in the area of sexuality are perpetrated by people who also engage in consensual behavior, so-called “normal” people – including the LGBT trash so desperate to be called “normal.” But given how many perverts we have in society, they are just a step away from a number of non-consensual acts, any time they want. Surely you know this very well?
Not to make this reply too long, I’ll end with a note of what a fraud your ideology is. You state that “consent” equals ” lack of harm” and should never warrant any accountability.
As one of many examples, if millions of people want to spread HIV/AIDS and syphilis consensually, this causes widespread harm and destruction in society, aside from billions in wasted health care. Yet it’s all consensual. As you probably know, turds of homosexual and bisexual men are currently society’s greatest spreaders of HIV and syphilis. And that is society’s business. Sexuality and relationships are ALWAYS society’s business. Only the perverts want to hide what they are doing to escape accountability.
August 20th, 2013 @ 9:01 am
Please stop trying to put words in my posts that aren’t there.
I never said lack of harm. I’ve also never said that people should escape responsibility for their actions.
Guess what. That’s any activity, not just sex. Freedom to choose means responsibility for the results.
And in case you haven’t noticed, I abhor the word “pervert.” I’ve seen it destroy innocent lives way too often.
I don’t believe you should police people’s sex lives. I don’t think you should police people’s lives, period. That doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be accountable for what they do, I just think the costs of tyranny far outweigh the illusion of safety.
August 20th, 2013 @ 9:11 am
I said in an earlier decade, it might have been Italian or Irish immigrants. Or the music of Presley, the writings of Whitman, or the notion that all men are created equal.
I added women in parentheses because I thought the statement should be qualified here.
My point is that every one of those things was considered perverted. You don’t even want to know what was written about Irish and Italian immigrants, some of it actually makes the Westboro Baptist Church seem classy.
August 20th, 2013 @ 10:37 am
The only thing I’m seeing is people who are perverted calling themselves normal and doing a great deal of harm with impunity.
The only way you can hold people accountable is if you know what they are doing. Just a re-statement of why sexuality and relationships are society’s business.
August 20th, 2013 @ 10:45 am
My point is that you are just making it up that most people on this site considered Italian immigrants as perverted, now or in an earlier decade. Or any of the other things you mention.
An additional point that needs to be made is that many people with your perverted views about sexuality also hated all kinds of immigrants, women, and children – and still do.
August 20th, 2013 @ 3:05 pm
Well, I’ll give you this much, you’re persistent.
Look again at the original article that began this thread. It was about people selecting companions and partners in an unorthodox way.
Not illegal, but unusual.
There was nothing except comments from readers like you to link that to pedophilia or homosexuality.
To me, it’s immoral and perverse that you’ve taken it on yourself to pass judgement when there is nothing to show that these people did the things you say that you oppose.
Would you accept them passing judgement on you?
Obviously not, from your response to me. And all I’ve done is defend their right to make their own choices.
August 20th, 2013 @ 3:07 pm
No, what I did was show what was “perverted” is not necessarily what is “perverted” today.
August 21st, 2013 @ 3:24 am
The criticism to the type of relationship discussed in the article is due to the fact that these are harmful types of relationships; they are dysfunctional and parasitic; therefore, analogous to other dysfunctional and parasitic types of relationships or sexualities. But for a pervert like yourself, nothing is perverted.
Obviously you know very little of what I think about relationships. Or you wouldn’t claim that I approve of such relationships. But you can’t really reply to me without lying about what I think, can you?
What you don’t want is accountability for yourself or for these people. Accountability is what you find immoral.
August 21st, 2013 @ 3:34 am
Interesting that you were trying to show something that was not being disputed and that doesn’t change the fact that for a pervert nothing is perverted, nor does it change the fact that the relationships in question are perverted. But here, show us something else: what is your definition of perverted in regard to relationships and sexuality?
August 21st, 2013 @ 8:31 am
You don’t know the relationships are harmful. That’s another pretty vague word.
If “dysfunctional” and “parasitic” are your standards, you’ll have to tell a lot of Americans they aren’t allowed to have relationships anymore. Ah, look at all the lonely people…
And now I’m a “pervert,” even though you know next to nothing about me. Are you sure you don’t want to take another look at that working definition?
I think that people are accountable to themselves and those whose lives they share.
August 21st, 2013 @ 8:37 am
I’ve shown that your slur word is just that, a slur word whose meaning changes with time and is routinely applied to anyone you might not agree with.
Frankly, I try not to use that word. Unless there is harm other than some ever-changing moral standard, it’s not my business to know what my neighbor does in his house, anymore than it’s his business what I think of sushi and motorcycles.
August 21st, 2013 @ 11:57 pm
Among the many things that I do know is that you keep running away from giving your definition of perverted.
I’m asking you: What is someone who is sexually perverted?
August 22nd, 2013 @ 12:50 am
You clearly have not shown that “my” word perverted is a slur.
Because you haven’t shown anything about the reality it describes. A slur is a false statement. And the last thing you have shown is that there are no sexually perverted people in the world. Thus “perverted” is the right word to describe people who are sexually perverted *in reality*. That’s no slur. You are also wrong to claim that the word is used to describe people whom I merely disagree with about anything. That is not my definition of sexually perverted. And that is also not the standard definition of perverted.
What you have shown is that you have a definition of perversion that says perversion isn’t perversion (hence your claim that it’s a slur). Thus you’re once again proving that for a pervert, nothing is perverted.
How can I call you a pervert, you ask? By examining the views and attitudes you display here. No slur at all.
If you don’t know what your neighbor does, you can’t hold them accountable for anything, including harm. That’s your goal, for you and for them.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 1:11 am
I have used no smear word. And debate isn’t being quashed at all – if you haven’t noticed, you continue to try to debate, without much success, it’s true, but the failure is on your part. No one is quashing you.
“How are these people perverted again?”
Which people are you referring to now?
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:09 am
Smear words are used to quash dissent. It works, unless someone questions it.
I meant the people in the original article. You know, the ones you called perverted, and then tried to link to sexual practices that you find even more repugnant.
Just so no one would question your original allegation.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:12 am
It’s not a valid premise.
It’s like asking me what food is kosher to me when I am not Jewish.
I abhor the word. I’ve seen it abused to many times. I prefer not to use it.
How many times can I say the same thing?
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:17 am
Except your definition keeps expanding.
You don’t know the people who the article describes, yet you link them to homosexuals and pedophiles. And then you called me perverted.
I certainly disagree with you, but you would be hard pressed to show anything else.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:36 am
This is no false premise. Have you noticed that you are trying to debate a word whose meaning you refuse to define? Unless of course you are ready to admit that for a pervert nothing is perverted.
Your Jewish analogy is a false one. Are you not a human being who has views, attitudes, and behaviors about sexuality and relationships? You are certainly a “Jew” then who has his own ideas about what is “kosher” when it comes to relationships and sexuality.
To summarize, you hate facing the reality of our world, which includes many sexually perverted individuals. When I use the word perverted, it has a specific meaning about a reality that you hate to face. In other words, you hate holding perverted people accountable, especially for any harm that they do in the sphere of sexuality and relationships, or in the ways that they are dysfunctional.
I actually had once written a definition of both “perverted” and “perverse” which I tried to find to post here today, but couldn’t. It should be somewhere on my blog. If I find it, I’ll post it.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 8:48 am
Another strawman: my definition of perverted wasn’t as restricted as you assumed. So the definition itself hasn’t expanded, there are many ways that one can be sexually perverted. I called you perverted because you are defending perverted attitudes and behaviors. See, no slur.
I think the most important point that I have shown is that for a pervert nothing is perverted. Denial and lack of accountability about your perverted attitudes and behaviors is what you are after.
As for your claim that I don’t know anything about the people in the article – the article presents us with information about women basically prostituting themselves. That is very perverted and the same is true for the trash of losers who pay these women.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 12:27 pm
No, I have pointed out that you keep using and changing your definition of a slur word. You still haven’t shown how the people in the original article have done anything except use an unusual method to pick a bed partner.
For that you’ve condemned them.
The really sad thing is that you don’t see anything wrong with that.
August 22nd, 2013 @ 12:32 pm
I’m defending the right of people to make their own choices with out society policing them for the “greater good.”
If you take a harder look, you’ll see that what the women in the article have done isn’t all that far removed from what some ladies have done for centuries. It’s part of civilization.