The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Neutral Objective Incompetence: How Ginger Gorham Aided Pedophile Network

Posted on | July 2, 2013 | 121 Comments

“I felt no sense anything was wrong. For all intents and purposes this appeared to be a loving family and a loving household, and I’ve gone over and over about it in my brain and I did not feel anything was wrong. … I’m profoundly shocked and disgusted by what’s happened. Since then, I just am revolted and I find myself quite despairing about the turn of events.”
— Ginger Gorham, Australian Broadcasting Company

When Wintery Knight first told me about this story, I was stunned: In 2010, Australian reporter Ginger Gorham produced a human-interest feature about two men and their son that glowed with the kind of one-sided enthusiasm one might expect to find in advertising copy for toothpast or a political endorsement. Nary a hint nor a shadow of skepticism dimmed the sunshine-and-rainbows narrative Gorham provided for Mark Newton and Peter Truong.

Oops.

Police Vow to Pursue Pedophile
Ring ‘To the Ends of the Earth’
Authorities in Australia say they intend to apprehend and prosecute every member of an international child pornography ring that exploited a boy who was molested from infancy by two men who reportedly created him with a Russian surrogate mother. “With this network, rest assured that we will pursue them to the ends of the Earth to make sure each and every one of them faces justice for what their role has been in crimes against this child,” Queensland Police Officer Jon Rouse told the Australian Broadcasting Company.
Officer Rouse is a member of Task Force Argos, the special unit that investigated the case of two Australian men who sexually molested a boy for six years, providing video of their crimes — and even paid sexual encounters with the boy — to an “international syndicate” of pedophiles called the Boy Lovers Network.
Mark Newton, 42, was sentenced to 40 years in federal prison last week by U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Authorities say Newton and his partner, Peter Truong, 36, paid a Russian woman $8,000 to give birth to a boy they said was conceived using artificial insemination with Newton’s sperm. The men began sexually abusing the boy before he was two weeks old, recording the acts on video they shared online with other pedophiles. . . .

You can read the rest at ViralRead. No one can doubt that Ginger Gorham is now shocked, disgusted and revolted by these horrifying revelations. And I wish to make clear to Ginger Gorham — or to anyone else who might get the wrong idea — that I am not unfairly trying to smear gay people with the taint of pedophilia.

What enraged me is how the utter one-sidedness of the news media in regard to homosexuality assisted Newton and Truong in their crime, so that when Gorham sought them out for a 2010 feature article, it amounted to free publicity for their criminal enterprise.

Journalists today cannot report about homosexuality, they must only advocate, endorse, praise and celebrate homosexuality. This paradigm reduces reporters to the role of propagandists, whose job is to parrot the publicity of radical gay-rights activists.

So far has this disastrous trend gone, that it never even occurred to Ginger Gorham that there was anything . . . odd about Truong and Newton’s extraordinary efforts to secure custody of an infant boy whom, we now know, they trained to perform as a gay sex toy:

Prosecutors said videos showed the boy “performing sex acts on Newton with a disturbing level of sophistication” when the boy was not yet 2 years old. At least eight different men had sex with the boy, investigators believe. ”The purchase of the child for the explicit and sole purpose of exploiting him across a network of men is incredibly depraved and very sad tale for that little boy,” Officer Rouse said.

The one story that the media will never report is their own abandonment of any pretense to fairness,  and anyone who tries to hold them accountable is deliberately exiled or ignored. This isn’t about homosexuality. There are any number of issues — from immigration to “climate change” to race relations — where journalists today are not expected to do actual reporting, but rather to promote a preconceived narrative, to advance an agenda.

Well, here is one “hate” I gladly confess: I thoroughly despise these dishonest dimwits who are disgracing the profession of journalism.

Ginger Gorham made herself an accomplice to this crime.

 

Category: Australia, Crime, Culture, Gays, Media Bias

Comments

121 Responses to “Neutral Objective Incompetence: How Ginger Gorham Aided Pedophile Network”

  1. RoseTompkins1
    July 4th, 2013 @ 1:46 am

    RT @WhiteRabbitRuns: Journalist shocked that 2 gay men had a baby via surrogate, to use in pedophilia http://t.co/8d6ib5OOVS @MarkLevinShow…

  2. TrotlineDesigns
    July 4th, 2013 @ 1:46 am

    RT @WhiteRabbitRuns: Journalist shocked that 2 gay men had a baby via surrogate, to use in pedophilia http://t.co/8d6ib5OOVS @MarkLevinShow…

  3. Steynian 478 | Free Canuckistan!
    July 4th, 2013 @ 12:07 pm

    […] REALITY BITES– “Wow, the ABC journalist Ginger Gorman who promoted gay adoption is blocking bloggers […]

  4. jame2
    July 4th, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    First, nobody really knows the number of homosexuals. And second, most cases of child sexual abuse are HETEROSEXUAL (men towards girls).

  5. jame2
    July 4th, 2013 @ 3:41 pm

    By that logic, we shouldn’t allow our kids near heterosexuals as well, since most child molestations/rapes are done by them. In fact, let’s ban ALL adoptions, since you say biological parents are better, and let kids grow up in orphanages.

  6. concern
    July 4th, 2013 @ 5:36 pm

    Seriously, take a look at the homosexual lifestyle…the gratuitous perversions, mental illness, disease, suicide…tell me you want your kids anywhere near that.

    Yes there’s a handful that pretend to be wholesome, but the facts are on display for all to see at every ‘pride’ rally and homosexual festival throughout the world. They don’t try to hide this shit unless they’re playing up to the MSM and trying to sell the destruction of marriage.

    I don’t think pride means what they think it means.

  7. jame2
    July 4th, 2013 @ 6:08 pm

    “the gratuitous perversions, mental illness, disease, suicide…”
    Because heterosexuals don’t have any of those problems (sarcasm)

  8. concern
    July 4th, 2013 @ 8:01 pm

    We don’t parade them in public and claim our pride in them and ask, no demand, that all and sundry approve, endorse and celebrate.

    The whole movement is inherently contradictory.

  9. jame2
    July 4th, 2013 @ 11:03 pm

    Except in Mardi Gras.

  10. Mariage homosexuel pour tous: Deux papas valent mieux qu’un qu’ils disaient (Two dads can be much worse than one) | jcdurbant
    July 5th, 2013 @ 3:19 am

    […] Ace journalist Robert S. McCain is trying to dig into the story, but the ABC journalist who wrote the story has blocked […]

  11. Mariage homosexuel: Deux papas valent mieux qu’un qu’ils disaient (Two dads can be much worse than one) | jcdurbant
    July 5th, 2013 @ 3:29 am

    […] Ace journalist Robert S. McCain is trying to dig into the story, but the ABC journalist who wrote the story has blocked […]

  12. Natassia
    July 6th, 2013 @ 1:57 am

    The CDC has made pretty good estimates, as have other research organizations. 3% of the population is about right. And of course most cases of child sex abuse are heterosexual. Most men on the planet ARE heterosexual. However, a disproportionate number of child sex offenders are men who target boys–homosexuals. And this should be no surprise since the practice of using boys for homosexual sex has a very long history throughout numerous societies and cultures.

  13. jame2
    July 6th, 2013 @ 4:41 pm

    All those estimates are based on “self-reporting”, and studies have shown that about 10% of people who identify as “heterosexual” engage in homosexuality or are attracted to their own sex. Also, most of the sex offenders who target boys aren’t out-and-out gay men, many of them are married to women (like Sandusky). Finally, heterosexuals have also used children for sex throughout history (“age of consent” is a relatively recent, western concept), and there are cultures in which is/was normal to marry young girls (like in the Middle East, India, Africa, Southeast Asia, even some parts in the United States). NOT that I’m advocating those things, just so you know that anyone can be a pedophile.

  14. Natassia
    July 7th, 2013 @ 7:20 pm

    EVEN IF that grossly-overestimated 10% number were correct, homosexuals are still over represented among child predators. Homosexuals, as a group, produce higher rates of child predators than heterosexuals do.

  15. jame2
    July 7th, 2013 @ 7:32 pm

    Any sources?

  16. jame2
    July 7th, 2013 @ 8:04 pm

    Studies have shown that the vast majority of predators are either uninterested in adults or engage in adult sexual relationships with women. Many of them molest children of either gender, so they can’t be considered homosexual.

    (A. Nicholas Groth and H. Jean Birnbaum, “Adult Sexual Orientation and Attraction to Underage Persons,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 7, no. 3 (1978): 180)

    (Gene G. Abel, “The Child Abuser: How Can You Spot Him?,” Redbook, August 1987, 100)
    (Kurt Freund, Robin Watson, Robert Dickey, and Douglas Rienzo, “Erotic Gender Differentiation in Pedophilia,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, no. 6 (1991): 555?566; Kurt Freund and Michael Kuban, “Erotic Gender Differentiation in Pedophilia: A Follow?Up,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 22, no. 6 (1993): 619?628.)

  17. Natassia
    July 9th, 2013 @ 11:39 am

    Actually, James, that’s not true. Most child predators have shown sexual interest in adults or continue to show sexual interest in adults. From the Oregon Sexual Assault Task Force:

    “A small percentage of those who offend children would be considered “pedophiles” and would be described as having a sexual preference for undeveloped bodies without secondary sexual characteristics.

    The majority of child abusers have more of a “thinking problem” rather than a sexual preference for children. These offenders have a capacity to sexually assault children rather than having a sexual preference for children and they tend to have significant “cross over” rates, often committing rape or other types of sexual assault.”

  18. Natassia
    July 9th, 2013 @ 11:43 am

    Do the math. Look at the percentage of sexual offenders who are male. Then look at the percentage of boys who are victimized. If heterosexual men, as a group, produce a proportionate amount of child predators as homosexual men, as a group, then boys should be victimized maybe 10% of the time, and 90% of the men’s victims should be girls. But that is not the case. Boys are victimized at higher rates than would be expected. And that is granting you the grossly overestimated (and every respected research group has in dictated it is overestimated by at least 5 percentage points), 10% of the population is gay.

  19. Natassia
    July 9th, 2013 @ 11:44 am

    The homosexual lifestyle IS a mental disorder.

  20. Natassia
    July 9th, 2013 @ 11:45 am

    James, sexual perversion goes hand-in-hand. There is a spectrum of perverted sexual behavior….and homosexual behavior is on it.

  21. Natassia
    July 9th, 2013 @ 11:51 am

    Another source on pedophilia and child sex abuse is a FAQ from the State of California’s Attorney General office:

    “Child sexual abusers are only attracted to children and are not capable of appropriate sexual relationships.

    “False. While there is a small subset of child sexual abusers who are exclusively attracted to children, the majority of the individuals who sexually abuse children are (or have previously been) attracted to adults.”