Scientology ‘Advertorial’ Scandal Exposes Atlantic Executive as Truthless Swine
Posted on | January 19, 2013 | 15 Comments
If nothing else, the past week has made clear that The Atlantic‘s president, M. Scott Havens, is an unethical scoundrel who cannot be trusted in the vicinity of anything purporting to be “journalism.”
Monday, The Atlantic embarrassed itself by publishing a glowing “sponsored content” article that heaped praise on the leadership of the Scientology cult. This ludicrous “advertorial” got yanked within 12 hours, after exposing the once-reputable Atlantic to vicious (and inarguably well deserved) ridicule, including a dead-on parody by The Onion: “The Taliban Is A Vibrant And Thriving Political Movement.”
The motives of the Scientology cultists were clear enough: A shocking exposé was coming out (Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief, by Lawrence Wright), so they were buying some public-relations damage control with this “article” at a prestigious journal.
Unfortunately for the Scientology swindlers, that backfired disastrously and the “sponsored content” scandal led to a “Streisand Effect” that actually increased scrutiny of the ripoff science fiction cult. Going Clear is now the No. 1 bestseller among religion books at Amazon, and No. 5 overall. The surge of media attention has also boosted sales of Janet Reitman’s 2011 book Inside Scientology: The Story of America’s Most Secretive Religion, as well as advance sales of the soon-to-be-released Beyond Belief: My Secret Life Inside Scientology and My Harrowing Escape, a tell-all memoir by Jenna Miscavige Hill, niece of Church of Scientology leader David Miscavige.
This negative publicity backlash has also damaged The Atlantic‘s upscale brand, and that damage is likely to be made worse by the attempt of the magazine’s top executive to talk his way out of this humiliation. Late Friday, M. Scott Havens sent out a company-wide memo that was immediately leaked to media watchdog Jim Romenesko. The memo was crammed with dishonest doubletalk like this:
We ran a “native advertising” campaign for a new advertiser that, while properly labeled as Sponsor Content, was in my opinion inconsistent with the strategy and philosophy for which this program is intended. In this case, we did not adequately work with the advertiser to create a content program that was in line with our brand. In addition, because we had not fully thought through the issues around commenting on Sponsor Content, we made some mistakes trying to moderate the commenting thread. The general media climate also played a role here.
Once these issues came to light and I had the opportunity to assess the campaign, I made the decision to suspend it pending further review. To be clear, our decision to pull the campaign should not be interpreted as passing judgment on the advertiser as an organization. Where I believe we erred was in the execution of the campaign.
Upon reading that self-serving heap of bullshit, one hopes, the entire staff of The Atlantic replied by e-mail with two weeks’ notice.
Havens is a lying pimp who treats his employees like dishonest whores.
(Via MediaGazer.)
PREVIOUSLY:
- Jan. 16: ‘Streisand Effect’: Scientology Imploding?
- Jan. 15: The Problem With ‘Sponsored Content’: Atlantic Unpublishes Scientology Article
Comments
15 Responses to “Scientology ‘Advertorial’ Scandal Exposes Atlantic Executive as Truthless Swine”
January 19th, 2013 @ 1:50 pm
Stacy, you are certainly giving the benefit of the doubt to Atlantic employees by suggesting that they are merely treated like “dishonest whores”.
Given the state of the media these days, it’s entirely possible that the majority of them ARE dishonest whores.
January 19th, 2013 @ 1:58 pm
The decline of The Atlantic began with the death of Michael Kelly in Iraq and accelerated when they gave Andrew Sullivan (!) a cover story that turned out to be six pages of fulminations in Sully’s classic stream-of-unconsciousness “style.”
January 19th, 2013 @ 2:03 pm
As a former Scientologist and knowing what that organization is all about, I greatly appreciate you covering stories about them.
Hubbard, in my opinion, is one of the greatest con-artists of the past century. His organization needs to be exposed for what it really is.
January 19th, 2013 @ 2:24 pm
They are following the same path trod by the Los Angeles Times, which sold its soul in the Staples Center “profit-sharing” scam.
People have to make choices in their careers, and sometimes the most important thing a journalist can do for his profession is to tender his resignation. There are simply some people you never want to work for, and Scott Havens just added his name to that list.
January 19th, 2013 @ 2:28 pm
Hahahaha HARHARHAR haw haw snort gasp choke… poor dumb bastards.
Anyway, would you prefer they be truthful swine? What are the odds of that happening?
January 19th, 2013 @ 2:32 pm
Honest whores wouldn’t be caught dead practicing journalism. Seriously, there are some things a twenty dollar crack whore just won’t do.
January 19th, 2013 @ 3:04 pm
The Master will not get big exposure, but (while a fictional story) it does give a good idea of how creepy L. Ron Hubbard really was.
January 19th, 2013 @ 3:05 pm
Yes indeed! RIP Michael Kelly.
January 19th, 2013 @ 6:16 pm
There is a possibly apocryphal account of a Scientologist looking for converts at a science-fiction convention… until she encountered L Sprague DeCamp who informed her that he had known L Ron Hubbard “when he was a small-time crook!”
January 20th, 2013 @ 11:29 am
“To be clear, our decision to pull the campaign should not be interpreted as passing judgment on the advertiser as an organization.”
That’s a pretty long-winded way to say, “Please, please, please send us ad money again, Mr. Miscavige!”
January 20th, 2013 @ 11:51 am
DeCamp. Never one of the top flight guys, but by god, I’d have loved to get him going on something. He got Harry Turtledove interested in Byzantine history of all things.
January 20th, 2013 @ 12:45 pm
Look, just about everybody knows Scientology is a cheap hustle but when are we going to do something about the fraud that is the Atlantic magazine?
January 24th, 2013 @ 5:12 pm
[…] like the Atlantic publishing a Scientology infomercial last week — and then realizing the full horror of what they had done, sending it off to […]
January 24th, 2013 @ 5:16 pm
[…] ran in the Atlantic. googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1347323895031-7'); }); Filed […]
January 25th, 2013 @ 7:34 pm
[…] like the Atlantic publishing a Scientology infomercial last week — and then realizing the full horror of what they had done, sending it off to 404-land […]