The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Doggy Style: Delaware Couple Arrested, Now Facing Felony Bestiality Charges

Posted on | January 11, 2013 | 95 Comments

Police say Samantha L. Golt had sex with a dog.

A 24-year-old Delaware mother had sex with a dog while her boyfriend took pictures, according to officials who arrested the couple this week.

Samanth L. Golt and 25-year-old boyfriend James P. Crow were arrested Tuesday and charged with felony bestiality and felony second-degree conspiracy for the alleged sex act that police say occurred at the couple’s Milford home, Delaware State News reports:

The investigation began when a Delaware State Police trooper was contacted by a concerned citizen in reference to abuse of a canine on Dec. 28, papers said.
During the investigation, photographs taken by Mr. Crow were collected as evidence, court documents said.
Police said they compared a Delaware Justice Information System Web Portal photograph to the evidence photo and positively identified Ms. Golt as the female having sex with the dog. . . .
Bestiality is a class D felony under state law. . . . A person convicted of bestiality would be placed on the state’s sex offender registry, the Delaware Attorney General’s Office said.

Samantha Golt is the mother of a 4-year-old girl. Golt had mentioned on Facebook that she owned three dogs, pit bulls and mixed breeds, the Digital Journal reported.

PREVIOUSLY:

Category: Crime, Delaware, Sex

Comments

95 Responses to “Doggy Style: Delaware Couple Arrested, Now Facing Felony Bestiality Charges”

  1. Mike Lee
    January 12th, 2013 @ 5:26 pm

    Are we sure the daughter is HIS?

  2. David Pittelli
    January 12th, 2013 @ 5:28 pm

    So people who have sex daily are thereby, out of boredom, going to end up F-ing dogs, children and anuses? If this really makes sense to you then you are almost as sick as the dog-Fing woman.

  3. Raptor Jesus
    January 12th, 2013 @ 5:50 pm

    Any kind of love is ok, it’s your hate you have to watch out for. At least that’s what they say. Gee, maybe they’re wrong.

  4. Forrest Sargente
    January 12th, 2013 @ 5:52 pm

    Shouldn’t the ‘animal rights’ activists be upset about this conviction, as they’re always trying to elevate critter status to that of humans.

  5. Rich Vail
    January 12th, 2013 @ 5:56 pm

    If it’s ok for a Columbia university professor to fuck his daughter, it’s ok for these people to bang their dogs…see the dichotomy here? You can’t have laws that aren’t enforced for one group of people, and then prosecute others under similar statutes.

    “laws are for the little people” mentality will be the end of our republic. The rule of law is fundamental to a successful democracy. If you don’t enforce ALL the laws on ALL of the people, you will end up having chaos, as the people begin to evade any laws they deem too restrictive…especially when those same laws AREN’T enforced on one set of politically influential people.

  6. Paul Hacker
    January 12th, 2013 @ 6:04 pm

    First they allowed gay marriage.

    Soon they will allow polygamy and Polyandry (both man with multiple wives and women with multiple husbands.)

    I mean why just allow gays? Marry your dog, or horse, or cow.

    Then there are even groups that push for ‘man-boy-love’, known as pedophilia.

    So they will push for that to be legal to. So why not animal sex?

    You see this is a form of incrementalism.

    You make one thing legal and that set the tone to push for more and more.

    Over time you destroy the norms of society, and that is what they do.

    This couple are on the edge of that. I have no doubt they ‘swing’ to.

    But after a while even the swinging lifestyle gets boring so they push for even more perverted sex.

    But as the guy said to Tom Welles in ‘8mm’, “Dance with the devil the devil don’t change, the devil changes you.”

    So the devil changes them as they go lower and lower, and there is no bottom to their depravity.

  7. Jason Wesch
    January 12th, 2013 @ 6:41 pm

    I had to paws for a moment after reading this story.

  8. s_c_f
    January 12th, 2013 @ 6:55 pm

    So, if one of those horny dogs out there starts humping your leg, you can be arrested if you don’t stop it soon enough?

  9. jdkchem
    January 12th, 2013 @ 6:59 pm

    She shoved a sausage in her snatch to tempt Fido?

  10. jdkchem
    January 12th, 2013 @ 7:01 pm

    In other words not up to the standards of a tabloid.

  11. Bill Gryan
    January 12th, 2013 @ 7:29 pm

    Well said. And the government’s decision to let David Gregory off is just more evidence of what we’re becoming.

  12. Bill Gryan
    January 12th, 2013 @ 7:46 pm

    Good to hear you’re a supporter of computer-generated kiddie porn. Make sure you tell your friends and see how they feel.

  13. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 7:53 pm

    Well said!

  14. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 7:59 pm

    I have to respectfully disagree. Spouses getting it on with each other in privacy is a good thing. Deviancy is not caused by spouses having great and loving sex. I contend anyone engaging in what this pair did are not loving but wallowing in the mud.

  15. Bill Gryan
    January 12th, 2013 @ 8:00 pm

    And all this time they told me that putting a dog on top of a car was cruel.

  16. Bill Gryan
    January 12th, 2013 @ 8:01 pm

    You two should be muzzled for making puns about a serious subject.

  17. Michael Albrecht
    January 12th, 2013 @ 8:28 pm

    jdkchen – peanut butter. No dog can resist peanut butter.

  18. bflat879
    January 12th, 2013 @ 9:29 pm

    But only if they could watch!

  19. 1389AD
    January 12th, 2013 @ 9:56 pm

    Am I going to Hell because I laughed at this?

  20. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:05 pm

    That is a deal breaker. I am pretty sure the Catholic Church would give you an annulment on that. Well said.

  21. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:06 pm

    To be fair, they limit themselves to “clean” animals like sheep and goats, but no dogs or pigs. Just sayin.

  22. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:07 pm

    Excellent point.

  23. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:11 pm

    We know statistically that male dogs are more prone to deviancy. Duh!

  24. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:11 pm

    I was channeling Meghan McCain when I wrote that.

  25. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:12 pm

    No. I suspect a few of the saints laughed too.,

  26. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:13 pm

    Nice one!

  27. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    January 12th, 2013 @ 10:14 pm

    That would make a great ad: I have sex with dogs and I voted for Obama (who eats them)! What an endorsement!

  28. 1389AD
    January 12th, 2013 @ 11:26 pm

    No, just trisexual. He’ll try anything!

  29. teapartydoc
    January 13th, 2013 @ 7:56 am

    This is the way it was in Rome during the Empire.

  30. DocRambo
    January 13th, 2013 @ 10:22 am

    Well Said: And Mr. Clinton is honored as Father of the Year!!

  31. DocRambo
    January 13th, 2013 @ 10:24 am

    You really should keep your remarks on a leash!

  32. DocRambo
    January 13th, 2013 @ 10:25 am

    Strongly suspect these proud parents are feral Democrats.

  33. Wombat_socho
    January 13th, 2013 @ 4:23 pm

    Well, they do make prosthetic testicles for neutered dogs, so…

  34. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:30 pm

    I see that you misunderstood what I wrote.
    When sex is available without restraint, it eventually becomes boring, no longer special. Sex and love are so detached from each other today, that love plays very little part in achieving satisfaction out of sex. I put it to you that those couples who understand that sex is part of love do not descend to perversity because they transcend the mere desire for physical satisfaction.

  35. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:30 pm

    They said, ‘Hey Towelhead, take a walk on the wild side….

  36. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:32 pm

    A leash with a spiked collar.

  37. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

    http://instantrimshot.com/index.php?sound=rimshot&play=true

  38. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:33 pm

    Maybe Lena Dunham would narrate it!

  39. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:34 pm

    THIS.

  40. Bob Belvedere
    January 13th, 2013 @ 6:41 pm

    Well said.

    I am also reminded of what a certain Justice wrote:

    …State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers’ validation of laws based on moral choices. Every single one of these laws is called into question by today’s decision; the Court makes no effort to cabin the scope of its decision to exclude them from its holding. See ante, at 11 (noting “an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding
    how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex” (emphasis added)). The impossibility of distinguishing homosexuality from other traditional “morals” offenses is precisely why Bowers rejected the rational-basis challenge. “The law,” it said, “is constantly based on notions of morality, and if all laws representing essentially moral choices are to be invalidated under the Due Process Clause, the courts will be very busy indeed.” 478 U.S., at 196.2

    Lawrence v Texas .

  41. Scotty G.
    January 13th, 2013 @ 10:03 pm

    Link of the Month. Thanks Bob!

  42. Rob Crawford
    January 14th, 2013 @ 9:28 am

    Actually, she can.

  43. andycanuck
    January 14th, 2013 @ 1:48 pm

    That’s what she said!

  44. matthew w
    January 16th, 2013 @ 7:47 am

    Do they make “strap ons” for dogs?
    Yes they do.
    How else would Rosie O’Donnel have sex?

  45. Theresam
    January 16th, 2013 @ 5:03 pm

    Brilliant post! Thanks!