The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

HuffPo and the Homo-Supremacy Agenda

Posted on | November 19, 2012 | 36 Comments

The rah-rah from the cheerleaders has become so deafening that people don’t even hear the noise anymore, and can’t think clearly about what is being constantly shouted at them.


 

Pardon my blunt language. One of these HuffPo articles is particularly intriguing. You see, not all “political causes” are created equal:

After her daughter’s eighth grade math teacher wore an anti-gay marriage pin to school, Cynthia Deford, a gay parent in Port Angeles, Washington, started an online campaign to ban teachers from promoting political causes in the classroom.
The Steven’s Middle School teacher, who has remained unnamed, wore a button to class in the days before the Nov. 6 election that stated “No on 74: one man + one woman = marriage,” according to Deford. The political message refers to Washington’s Referendum 74, which legalized gay marriage in the state, passing with 52 percent of the vote.
Although Port Angeles School District Superintendent Jane Pryne told the Peninsula Daily News that the issue has been addressed, and the school district already has policy regarding politics in the classroom in place, Deford wants more to be done; she is calling for an official apology and sensitivity training for teachers.
“It just shocked me that it happened here,” Deford told the Peninsula Daily News.
In her online petition on SignOn.org, Deford wrote that her daughter came home upset after seeing a teacher — who she once thought highly of — wear such a discriminatory button in class.

She wants to “ban teachers from promoting political causes in the classroom,” but tolerance toward homosexuality . . . Well, that’s not political. That’s just the way things are. Unless you question “the way things are,” and then you’re evil.

So the agenda now is compulsory approval. Everyone must pledge allegiance to the Rainbow Flag, and once you are forbidden to disapprove of homosexuality, logically, your refusal to participate in gay sex will be classified as an unacceptable form of “discrimination.”

This isn’t about “equality” or “liberation.” No, it’s about homo hegemony, as the fanatics seek to secure a privileged and superior status for themselves and their preferences. That’s not disco music you hear, it’s the sound of hobnailed boots marching over broken glass.

Tolerance gradually reveals itself as totalitarianism, and it’s amazing that people acquiesce to such bullying. According to a recent Gallup survey, 3.4 percent of Americans identify themselves as “LGBT,” to use the de rigeur acronym. Why should 96.6 percent be compelled to kowtow to the sensibilities of the 3.4 percent?

Why are we constantly being hectored about issues related to “LGBT” when there are probably more Lithuanian-Americans than there are lesbian Americans? Should a minority be rewarded with extra attention just because they make obnoxious pests of themselves?

What was once “The Love That Dare Not Speak Its Name” has become The Alternative Lifestyle That Won’t Shut Up, and their constant yammering about it has become clichéd and repetitive.

Category: Culture, Gays, Huffington Post

Comments

36 Responses to “HuffPo and the Homo-Supremacy Agenda”

  1. Montford greenwood
    November 19th, 2012 @ 7:22 pm

    They’re busy trying to convince themselves their deviant life style is okay and normal.
    The truth is I doubt most of them actually believe their argument is true.
    If people stop pointing out their life CHOICE is wrong then I think they think it will be easier for them.
    Nasty people.

  2. Kyle Kiernan
    November 19th, 2012 @ 7:27 pm

    Being only 5% of any population is pretty much the textbook definition of “abnormal”.

  3. Bob Belvedere
    November 19th, 2012 @ 7:28 pm

    And, of course, the Leftist Masterminds egg the homosexuals and their enablers on because the more success they have, the more crumbling of Western Society occurs.

  4. MJosephSheppard
    November 19th, 2012 @ 7:32 pm

    @smitty_one_each R.S Mc in full war cry.Lithuanian-American/lesbian- Americans is hoot of the day.

  5. robertstacymccain
    November 19th, 2012 @ 7:50 pm

    Your use of “deviant” suggests that you haven’t noticed that, after decades of “defining deviancy down,” we’ve quite nearly defined it out of existence. Except for smoking, obesity and voting Republican, nothing is really considered “deviant” anymore.
    If you’re a tattooed transvestite Rastafarian, no one should call you “weird,” because that would be judgmental and might damage your self-esteem, and nothing is more important than self-esteem in 21st-century culture, unless perhaps it’s nonjudgmentalism.

  6. Montford greenwood
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:01 pm

    Their deviant and if they can’t take it they have their lovers plunge the definition into them.

  7. HuffPo and the Homo-Supremacy Agenda : The Other McCain « God's Own Crunk
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:11 pm

    […] via HuffPo and the Homo-Supremacy Agenda : The Other McCain. […]

  8. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:17 pm

    I feel sad for all those ladies who will miss out on that Nate Silver mojo. But you guys all have a shot at him!

  9. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:19 pm

    “Except for smoking tobacco, obesity and voting Republican…”

    I needed to correct you on that one.

  10. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:20 pm

    Actually more like 2-3%, but hey, here’s to recruitment. If you are a real slut, being bisexual really opens up your options.

  11. Because only CERTAIN political causes are political to the Left « The Daley Gator
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:23 pm

    […] McCain looks at how the Left looks at “political” causes You see, not all “political causes” are created […]

  12. Wombat_socho
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:30 pm

    Yes, I’m told it gives you twice as much opportunity to strike out on Saturday night at the bar.

  13. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:32 pm

    Guys, didn’t you get the memo about us being the big fat gay Grand Old Party? Okay enough of that gay talk. Let’s talk about football instead?

  14. CalCon10
    November 19th, 2012 @ 8:39 pm

    We’re all born with a conscience. These leftist LGBT activist scumbags know innately that there’s something wrong with their lifestyle.

    Only people trying to drown out the sound of their conscience are so viciously strident. That’s what makes them so dangerous and successful: they are obsessed with doing what amounts to the Devil’s work.

    Kinda makes me (almost) wish I was evil, so I could be on the winning team now and then.

  15. RhymesWithRight
    November 19th, 2012 @ 9:11 pm

    I posted this quote from Tinker v. Des Moines in the comments — “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

  16. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 19th, 2012 @ 9:52 pm

    Nice one! We should ask Meghan McCain. She would know.

  17. K-Bob
    November 19th, 2012 @ 10:07 pm

    I think it’s moved up to pan-nonjudgementalism

  18. John Rose
    November 19th, 2012 @ 10:21 pm

    True. Good catch.

  19. Finrod Felagund
    November 19th, 2012 @ 11:10 pm

    Yep, two times zero is still zero.

  20. xthred
    November 19th, 2012 @ 11:41 pm

    Brilliant!

  21. Adjoran
    November 20th, 2012 @ 12:16 am

    I don’t give a gay rat’s patootie what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes or leased quarters. As long as it “neither picks my pocket nor breaks
    my leg.” You don’t need your approval and I don’t need yours. We’re cool, Homie.

    But when I am forced to watch it, or pay for it, or pay for the injuries you inflict upon yourself from it, or have my taxes raised to give you favored tax status for it, you’ve crossed the line, Butkis. We’re no longer cool, and I don’t care how you feel about that. You’re a freakin thief – worse, a robber who steals with threat of violence (because if you don’t believe government policies are enforced by violence, try not paying your taxes and see what the chaps who come to take you away have in their holsters – no sudden moves for your cellphone, mmmkay?) and a threat to my freedom and property.

  22. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 20th, 2012 @ 1:47 am

    Well said!

  23. Evi L. Bloggerlady
    November 20th, 2012 @ 1:52 am

    Talking about losers who can’t get dates: Charles “Chunky Boo Boo” Johnson is back into the mix with his pals Rauhauser and Kimberlin. He just can’t quit them.

  24. Finrod Felagund
    November 20th, 2012 @ 4:54 am

    You do realize that a full third of non-straight folks identify as Republican and conservative?

    Say what you will about the liberals, but there’s no need to bash the conservative non-straights. GOProud is doing a good job filling the niche that the Log Cabin Republicans vacated (they’re no longer even Republicans so their very name is a misnomer).

  25. jsn2
    November 20th, 2012 @ 7:03 am

    Cock sucking is a resume enhancer for progressives with the added benefit of faux gravitas to the “suckers” reputation. But, if the vacuumer changes political views he becomes a lowly faggot in the eyes of his former cult members . The pack will turn on a nonconformist in an instant. (Same with carpet munchers.)

    P.S.

    The Other McCain is the only blog I’m aware of that allows the term ” sucks cock” in a post, but not in comments where we must resort to euphemisms. Disqus is actually a pretty good commenting service and I’m sure relieves the moderators of much language editing and other housekeeping duties. Believe me, this is no complaint just an ironic observation.

  26. Bob Belvedere
    November 20th, 2012 @ 7:44 am

    Thanks for the guffaw, Evi.

  27. Bob Belvedere
    November 20th, 2012 @ 7:47 am

    So…Obama rails against the 1% and says he’s down with the 99%, but, in reality, he’s represents only the 3.4%?

    I’m so confused.

  28. Rob Crawford
    November 20th, 2012 @ 9:26 am

    A whole third of 3.4%! WOW! Can’t risk that particular 1%, can we?

  29. Liberals Scream TOLERANCE! But Only for Their Causes – Namely Homosexual Approval | ZION'S TRUMPET
    November 20th, 2012 @ 1:51 pm

    […] McCain looks at how the Left looks at “political” causes You see, not all “political causes” are created […]

  30. dee_m_wilson
    November 20th, 2012 @ 2:04 pm

    Gee, Stacy, that sounds awfully nonjudgmentally judgmental! ;^D

  31. Finrod Felagund
    November 20th, 2012 @ 4:36 pm

    Because we’d never lose an election by just 2 percent.

  32. WyBlog - Remember Freedom? On this date in 1789 NJ became the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights
    November 20th, 2012 @ 4:57 pm

    Remember Freedom? On this date in 1789 NJ became the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights…

    Well, let’s see. We have a State Religion now. Tolerance. Led of course by the High Priests of Homosexuality, where the agenda is compulsory approval. What they label “equality” is in fact totalitarianism. Reject the Rainbow Flag and you’re guilty …

  33. Remember freedom? « The Daley Gator
    November 20th, 2012 @ 6:12 pm

    […] have a State Religion now. Tolerance. Led of course by the High Priests of Homosexuality, where the agenda is compulsory approval. What they label “equality” is in fact totalitarianism. Reject the Rainbow Flag and […]

  34. Quartermaster
    November 20th, 2012 @ 7:00 pm

    It’s new math, Bob. Unless you’ve been certified to teach, you’ll never understand it.

  35. garymrosen
    November 21st, 2012 @ 2:00 am

    Believe it or not, the late San Francisco Chronicle columnist Herb Caen used that line a long time ago: “It used to be the love that dare not speak its name. Now it won’t shut up”.

  36. Bob Belvedere
    November 21st, 2012 @ 8:27 am

    I’m royally screwed then.