The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

‘Most Beautiful Woman in Canada’ Is …

Posted on | April 10, 2012 | 40 Comments

. . . kind of like “conservative Republican from Massaschusetts.”

 

Jenna Talackova is accepted as a woman for the same reason some accept Mitt Romney as a conservative: Because Donald Trump said so!

The similarities don’t end there: Jenna also used to have a “flip-flopper” problem. Now she’s got an “enthusiasm gap.”

Some women don’t accept Mitt as authentic. I’m sure Jenna can relate.

 

MITT ROMNEY for PRESIDENT
Let’s Support Our Trans-Conservative Nominee!

Category: Canada, Donald Trump, Mitt Romney

Comments

40 Responses to “‘Most Beautiful Woman in Canada’ Is …”

  1. Mike G.
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:04 pm

    If Mitt had her looks, he’d be a shoo-in.

  2. Asian_chic
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:07 pm

    Gee. He doesn’t even have her balls when attacking Obama. 

  3. Evilbloggerlady
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:17 pm

    That would have made a hellava Separated at Birth. Bravo. I am unworthy of the title “evil” after that! This is one of your funiest. Remind me never to get on your bad side.

  4. BruceC
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:42 pm

    I’d hit tha….      No, wait, what?

  5. Charles
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:48 pm

    The contest isn’t until May 19 and, much like Rick Santorum in DC and Virginia, Jenna has not submitted all her paperwork.

    The fine print says Jenna can compete “provided she meets the legal gender recognition requirements of Canada, and the standards established by other international competitions”.

    Trump is likely going to rule that if Jenna can’t compete in the Olympics she can’t compete in his pageant. In other words, Jenna will not be getting all the delegates she think she deserves from North Dakota.

    There are quite a number of contestants, by the way:

    http://www.beautiesofcanada.com/muc/contestants/2012-finals/

  6. Ryan Costa
    April 10th, 2012 @ 11:58 pm

     Why are we still bashing Romney? Whatever his flaws, they are nowhere near as big as Obama’s.  The Republican primary is over.  It is time to unite and focus on the task at hand.

    beatbarack.blogspot.com   

  7. Asian_chic
    April 11th, 2012 @ 12:08 am

    I guess you want us all to hold hands and sing Kumbaya. I swear it, you just trampled on the little joy I have left. (Thanks to Stacy for the post.)

  8. Terry_Jim
    April 11th, 2012 @ 12:10 am

    So you’d say Mr. Talaklova is “severely female”
    or “severed male”?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romney-reframes-himself-as-a-severely-conservative-governor/2012/02/14/gIQAaMiqHR_story.html

  9. BruceC
    April 11th, 2012 @ 12:20 am

    Johnny: Our receptionist, the beautiful Jennifer Marlowe, is a result of the most cunningly successful sex change operation in the United States!

    Herb: Get outa here! (Johnny turns to go) Wait a minute. Are you trying to tell me that Jennifer – that she’s a …

    Johnny: Guy. Or at least, she used to be.

  10. Adjoran
    April 11th, 2012 @ 2:32 am

     Oh, yeah, the whole thing is a publicity stunt.  Trump’s a master at promoting his ventures.

  11. Adjoran
    April 11th, 2012 @ 2:32 am

     Is little Joy your daughter?  Hope she’s okay!

  12. Adjoran
    April 11th, 2012 @ 2:59 am

    The only people who are excited about Romney are his family, Hugh Hewitt, Jen Rubin, and some lucky early supporter who will be our first Ambassador to Vanuatu.

    But he is going to be the nominee.  The alternative is four more years of Obama.  That’s not a tough decision for me.  But it is only the start – we also need to retake the Senate with a decent majority to be able to pass the cuts and reforms that MUST come to avert a fiscal Armageddon.

    Congress has to take the lead on that, under the Constitution the President can’t refuse to spend lawful appropriations (Nixon tried that and SCOTUS slapped him hard).  The President will have to implement the cuts, get rid of the bloated and inefficient operations, lay off federal workers, and do more with less. 

    There are a handful of executives in the country better equipped to do that than Romney is, but none of them ran.

    The country is headed for an absolute disaster if we do not reverse course NOW.  If you can’t get excited with enthusiasm for Romney, try looking at the deficit numbers and see if fear moves you.

  13. Asian_chic
    April 11th, 2012 @ 3:30 am

    Yes. My pride and Joy…

  14. elaine
    April 11th, 2012 @ 5:14 am

     You keep cheerleading for the guy as if our enthusiasm will make the difference.  The fact is, it’s the independent/low interest voters who will decide this.  And I don’t see them voting for the Mittster.  If he can’t even pull a majority of Republicans in the various primary states, he sure as heck can’t pull a majority of all voters in the general.  Not to mention there were two very close states which went for McCain last time which will definitely be going Obama this time.  (Margin of victory in one case was 0.14%.  Both states — Missouri and Montana — have democrat Secretaries of State.)

    Obama’s a shoe-in.  Doesn’t matter how bad the economy gets.  Doesn’t matter how reckless DC spending is.

    DOES.  NOT.  MATTER.

    Romney will spell doom for the GOP at the polls in November, just like McCain did.

    The media is already running happy-talk stories about what great strides the economy is making.  That rising inflation really isn’t so bad.  How low unemployment is.  And how, since the economy is getting better, why should we change horses mid-stream?  (Yes, I’ve heard or seen every one of those in the past couple of weeks.  And we’re seven months away from the election…)

    If all that weren’t enough to guarantee an Obama win, there’s the voter fraud which you KNOW is going to happen.  All that money Obama’s been illegally collecting?  It’s going to pay people to register voters full time.  Thousands of people to register voters.  Wonder how many non-existent people they’ll register?  Wonder if any Secretaries of State will challenge them?  Wonder if the courts will uphold the challenges?

    Yeah, I’m extremely pessimistic at this point, because the GOP has a long history of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.  And that’s what will happen if Romney gets the nod.

    So you just go ahead and do your cheerleading thing.  It won’t do any good; Romney is going to lose.  It’s been ordained on high — just ask Obama…

  15. vermontaigne
    April 11th, 2012 @ 6:23 am

    I fear it may take more Bondo  than I have to fill that enthusiasm gap.

  16. Chuck
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:16 am

    So Romney has grown more conservative the longer he’s been in politics. Gee, that makes him a flip-flappin’ bastard…if you’re retarded.

  17. SDN
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:27 am

    “Romney has grown more conservative the longer he’s been in politics.”

    Talk about assertion without evidence….

  18. Bob Belvedere
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:30 am

    Little Miss Attila is your daughter?!?

    Heck, you look like sisters.

  19. Bob Belvedere
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:36 am

    You know what gets me, Dan?  If you can’t see his Adam’s Apple, it’s hard to figure out he’s not a woman.  And this is because so many real women exercise their arms into looking like those of a fourteen year old boy and they get the hydraulics installed.

    Bloody awful, it is.

  20. Our Double-Secret Strategy To Ensure GOP Triumph : The Other McCain
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:46 am

    […] the Alamo, and we’re just not going to roll over for a conservative show-horse, even if he could take a Canadian beauty contest.But you’ve got to understand that this is a higher form of loyalty! You see, if we were to […]

  21. vermontaigne
    April 11th, 2012 @ 8:22 am

     It’s Not Pat.

  22. Pathfinder's wife
    April 11th, 2012 @ 9:21 am

    Nah, a woman (or man) who has to do actual lifting and work wouldn’t have such skinny areas around the elbows.

    I know this because my kids and I are hicks, and have never been a stranger to hard, manual labor (like hay baling, fence setting, barn building, engine pulling, large animal tending — the kind of stuff a lot of men don’t do anymore).

    I’d hate to see the 14 yo. boys you’re describing if Victor/Victoria here’s arms are comparable.

  23. Pathfinder's wife
    April 11th, 2012 @ 9:30 am

    Which makes an interesting analogy of Mitt’s severe conservatism when you think about it…

  24. Bob Belvedere
    April 11th, 2012 @ 9:38 am

    Good point.

  25. Pathfinder's wife
    April 11th, 2012 @ 10:02 am

    Still at it today huh?

    You’re working for Obama aren’t you?  Honestly, because you are doing a great job if you are and deserve the kudos.

  26. Pathfinder's wife
    April 11th, 2012 @ 10:03 am

    ..as well as the beer and pretzels (but not Shiner Bock, because I’m not sure you’re ready for that just yet, better stick to Schlitz for now kiddo).

  27. Charles
    April 11th, 2012 @ 10:10 am

    Bingo!

  28. I’ll Vote For Mitt Romney Because I Hate Barack Obama | Daily Pundit
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:11 am

    […] I’ll Vote For Mitt Romney Because I Hate Barack Obama Posted on April 11, 2012 8:11 am by Bill Quick Our Double-Secret Strategy To Ensure GOP Triumph : The Other McCain This invites the question: should we just form up and join the March for Mittens? Why, no: no, we should not. Look folks, the American spirit wasn’t crushed when the Japanese nuked the Alamo, and we’re just not going to roll over for a conservative show-horse, even if he could take a Canadian beauty contest. […]

  29. Asian_chic
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:41 am

    Although I sometimes call her Hun, she has her father’s look.

  30. Nomination Excitations: The Final Chapter? « The Camp Of The Saints
    April 11th, 2012 @ 2:35 pm

    […] it or not, Stacy McCain, employing modern [or is it 'Postmodern'] logic, sees no reason why we should not jump on the Romney bandwagon: after all, he would be our first Trans-Conservative […]

  31. Bob Belvedere
    April 11th, 2012 @ 3:54 pm

    Oh, you wacky Orientals!

  32. Pete Petretich
    April 11th, 2012 @ 7:53 pm

    Mitt Romney is a serial liar and a baby-killer. Only a fool would believe anything he says about anything.

  33. Ryan Costa
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:09 pm

    I was tempted to respond, but I think I’ll just refer to Dana Loesch

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/11/Galvanize

    And to quote Andrew Breitbart

    “Anyone that is willing to stand next to me to fight the progressive left I will be in that bunker, and if you’re not in that bunker because you’re not satisfied with this candidate, more than shame on you, you’re on the other side.” 

    Be Breitbart

    beatbarack.blogspot.com

  34. Chuck
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:21 pm

     The evidence is there for anyone honest enough to accept it.

  35. Chuck
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:27 pm

     Been at the truth every day for decades. This isn’t a soap opera to me. I’m sure this is empty entertainment for folks like you. To me, it’s a big deal. I want to save my country from the Communist incumbent. You assholes would rather see him win than support his opponent.

    May you rot in dumpsters. I have more respect for the vermin who populate the left than I have for those who aid them through this retarded form of masturbation they call “fighting the good fight”.

    Drivel. There IS an enemy. YOU aid them through your proud stupidity.

    Pity a pathfinder.

  36. Chuck
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:28 pm

     So get a Communist elected.

    Fuckwads.

  37. Asian_chic
    April 11th, 2012 @ 11:35 pm

    I am heart broken with lots of anger. You can’t beat me up while a robbery is occurring, then tell me to help you fight the robbers right after. Sorry, NOT NOW! 

  38. Chaosweed
    April 12th, 2012 @ 11:26 am

     …no where near as big as O’s?….how are things in the alternate reality?  try reading more than just the right-wing blogs.  enlighten yourself.

  39. ThePaganTemple
    April 12th, 2012 @ 3:01 pm

     Oh here we go again with more insanity. Mitt Romney supported Pro-Choice when running for the Senate in Massachusetts and as Governor, so even though he swears now he has become Pro-Life, we should not support him, even though his opponent is the most Pro-Choice man to ever be President and voted against the Born Alive Act, which prevented anyone from saving the life of a baby that survived an abortion attempt.

    If Obama wins the White House because of people like you, who’s the baby killer? You fanatics are something else. Did you ever stop to wonder how many babies you could have saved if maybe you took a little bit more of a reasoned approach, instead of this bullshit insisting that no abortion should be allowed for any reason whatsoever?

    My guess is no you haven’t because you don’t really give a good fuck, deep down, its just something you go on about to feel better about yourselves, and to use as a tire iron to smash any politician who crosses you once too often.

    Admit it. You know as well as I do the vast majority of aborted fetuses are from the wombs of leftist women, Democrats, or just ne’er-do-wells who vote Democrat in exchange for an extra rock of crack. You don’t really give a bit more of a fuck about them than I do, if as fucking much.

    At least admit it and stop being a fucking hypocrite about it.

  40. Pete Petretich
    April 12th, 2012 @ 3:56 pm

    I remind you that Mitt has NOT won the nomination. Only when the delegates vote in Tampa and then the nominee accepts the nomination THEN the primary will be over.

    Also, I will repeat what I initially said because it is indubitable: “Mitt Romney is a serial liar and a baby-killer. Only a fool would believe anything he says about anything.”