The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Santorum in S.C. Says Obama Views America as a ‘Mistake,’ Divides Nation

Posted on | January 15, 2012 | 11 Comments

MYRTLE BEACH. S.C.
President Obama sees America’s transformational role in world history as a “mistake,” Rick Santorum said this morning at a gathering of Christian conservative activists.

The founding principles of limited government permit people “to pursue their dreams, to provide for themselves and build strong families and communities and build a great country, as [Alexis] de Tocqueville wrote about in the early days of America, from the bottom up,” Santorum said at the Faith & Freedom Coalition’s Prayer Breakfast here. “We’re the wealthiest country in the world and the world is wealthier because they have become more like us. We’ve transformed humankind. And we have a president who sees all of that as a mistake.”

The former Pennsylvania senator, who was endorsed Saturday by a key national gathering of evangelical Christian leaders, was introduced at Sunday’s prayer breakfast by Ralph Reed. Santorum urged South Carolinians to “vote your conscience, vote what you know if right for this country” in next Saturday’s crucial Republican presidential primary.

“We need to have someone who understands that vision and understands that if we if we stand up for the princples that made this country great — people ask, ‘How are you going to unite us together?’ Remind every American who we are,” Santorum told a crowd of more than 350 at the Sheraton Convention Center, and then said of Obama: “This president reminds us of what divides us, not what unites us.”

Category: Barack Obama, Election 2012, Rick Santorum, South Carolina

Comments

11 Responses to “Santorum in S.C. Says Obama Views America as a ‘Mistake,’ Divides Nation”

  1. steve benton
    January 15th, 2012 @ 12:06 pm

    Glad he is coming to his senses about big government. So, is Santorum going to now renounce most of his votes over the past 10 years?

  2. Bruce Donnelly
    January 15th, 2012 @ 12:31 pm

    If we are to believe the narrative that Romney is so inevitable and such a nice guy, why did he just challenge the petitions of Rick Santorum in Illinois on Friday? Meanwhile, despite well-publicized defects in the Rick Perry and Ron Paul petitions here, he didn’t bother to challenge those. In short, he’s happy to see the conservative vote split so that it is easier for him to look like a winner with only 30% support, but didn’t want to risk actually losing delegates to Santorum.
    Note that delegate petition challenges have been rare since the 1976 nomination fight between Reagan and Ford. Although the Santorum delegates were vulnerable to a challenge for lack of sufficient signatures since they were largely Herman Cain supporters and organized too late in the process after Cain suspended his campaign, there seemed to be a “gentleman’s agreement” with the Romney campaign to not challenge. Instead, by the Friday afternoon deadline for challenges, the Romney campaign was evidently worried enough about the Santorum campaign to risk adverse publicity by knocking them off the ballot.
    On the other hand, they obviously didn’t perceive Ron Paul or Rick Perry to be a serious threat. Perry didn’t file slates of delegates in Illinois, nor did Huntsman. Ron Paul’s supporters had done their delegate petitions properly, so only his “top line” petition was vulnerable – but that doesn’t affect delegates. It’s a beauty contest, like a straw poll, and therefore has no impact other than publicity. If the Romney crowd was concerned about valid petitions, they would have challenged both the Perry and Paul petitions. Instead, they were just worried about losing delegates to Santorum, and wanted to weaken the image of his campaign in the other early primary states. Nice guy, eh? Is this what Illinois voters want? As you may recall, Obama rose to power in Illinois through petition challenges. The end justifies the means to maintain the myth of inevitability.

  3. Bruce Donnelly
    January 15th, 2012 @ 12:32 pm

    If we are to believe the narrative that Romney is so inevitable and such a nice guy, why did he just challenge the petitions of Rick Santorum in Illinois on Friday? Meanwhile, despite well-publicized defects in the Rick Perry and Ron Paul petitions here, he didn’t bother to challenge those. In short, he’s happy to see the conservative vote split so that it is easier for him to look like a winner with only 30% support, but didn’t want to risk actually losing delegates to Santorum.
    Note that delegate petition challenges have been rare since the 1976 nomination fight between Reagan and Ford. Although the Santorum delegates were vulnerable to a challenge for lack of sufficient signatures since they were largely Herman Cain supporters and organized too late in the process after Cain suspended his campaign, there seemed to be a “gentleman’s agreement” with the Romney campaign to not challenge. Instead, by the Friday afternoon deadline for challenges, the Romney campaign was evidently worried enough about the Santorum campaign to risk adverse publicity by knocking them off the ballot.
    On the other hand, they obviously didn’t perceive Ron Paul or Rick Perry to be a serious threat. Perry didn’t file slates of delegates in Illinois, nor did Huntsman. Ron Paul’s supporters had done their delegate petitions properly, so only his “top line” petition was vulnerable – but that doesn’t affect delegates. It’s a beauty contest, like a straw poll, and therefore has no impact other than publicity. If the Romney crowd was concerned about valid petitions, they would have challenged both the Perry and Paul petitions. Instead, they were just worried about losing delegates to Santorum, and wanted to weaken the image of his campaign in the other early primary states. Nice guy, eh? Is this what Illinois voters want? As you may recall, Obama rose to power in Illinois through petition challenges. The end justifies the means to maintain the myth of inevitability.

  4. adolph.stephens
    January 15th, 2012 @ 12:33 pm

    That’s a ridiculous question.

    Maybe he should defend or explain them but congressional votes are not made in a vacuum, not to mention that without contemporaneous context one can’t necessarily judge the motivation for the vote at the time.  I’ll concede that a certain amount of that last sentence looks like justification but the fact remains, individual votes do not by themselves define elected officials.  It’s the macro not the micro.

    I get it, Santorum may not be the “perfect” candidate for some.  Is there one?  How about we stop looking for candidates who can jump through the maze of hoops required to fulfill everyone’s wish list?  And focus on time tested qualities like,
    Leadership.  Courage.  Principle.  Conviction.

    All the rest is just politics as usual.

  5. ThePaganTemple
    January 15th, 2012 @ 1:22 pm

    I never heard Romney referred to as a nice guy even by his supporters. You’re right thought about what he’s trying to accomplish. The problem for him is, it might backfire on him if Newt is still in the race, particularly if Newt pulls out a victory in SC and goes on from there. Then, with Santorum out, assuming Romney succeeds here, Gingrich will get all the conservative vote. Let’s face it, most of Paul’s votes are coming from democrats and independents, and first time youth voters registering GOP just to vote for him. And by the time this comes about, Perry will probably no longer be around.

  6. richard mcenroe
    January 15th, 2012 @ 1:29 pm

    Stacy, tell your editor to slap you in the wrist for that misleadingly written title.  Santorum didn’t divide the nation; just the Gingrinches and Paulbots.

  7. Tennwriter
    January 15th, 2012 @ 1:49 pm

    Hey the King of Bain is a nice guy.  Its why Gerald Van Der Leun was calling us dimwits for not getting on board, and some doof was volunteering to punch those who didn’t vote for Romney against Obamma in the nose.

    Its because they are so kind and generous that they have to resort to intimidation, and internet tough guy threats.

    Romney is inevitable just like Perry.  Vote for Romney, or leave America now, you traitor!

  8. Adjoran
    January 15th, 2012 @ 4:11 pm

    Santorum has whatever “momentum” there is in South Carolina.  Newt is facing a huge backlash from his anti-capitalist rhetoric and blatantly false advertising.  He is trying to walk it back somewhat but people are beginning to realize this is not something out of character, but rather the usual fare from Gingrich.  He’s a nasty little jerk who enjoys stabbing conservatives in the back as much as John McCain ever did, probably more.

    Perry never recovered from his huge initial fizzle.  He hasn’t been able to reinflate the balloon, although he is being well received on the stump here (he dropped the anti-Bain stuff from his speech) and his advertising is all positive.  I don’t see him breaking out of single digits.

    When I noted Paul’s strength among active military and recent vets, I was ridiculed on this board.  I read yesterday somewhere that of active duty military contributions, 70% have gone to Paul.  Not sure if it’s true – I forgot to note the site, and haven’t had time to look up the numbers.  But he is definitely much stronger here than the 3% he pulled in 2008.  Probably at least 12%, but his ceiling is going to be not too much higher than that.

    Romney looks like he’s going to win, though.  Santorum is starting from too far back with too little time, and Newt and Perry are going in the wrong direction.

  9. The Camp Of The Saints
    January 17th, 2012 @ 6:55 pm

    The Spot-On Quote Of The Day……

    …is awarded to Rick Santorum for summarizing Barack Hussein Obama’s guiding philosophy so succinctly [tip of the fedora to Stacy McCain]: We’re the wealthiest country in the world and the world is wealthier because they have become more lik…

  10. South Carolina Primary Day: Before My Saturday Afternoon Nap in Charleston : The Other McCain
    January 21st, 2012 @ 3:58 pm

    […] My Son, the C-SPAN StarJan. 15: Good-Bye, Governor AsteriskJan. 15: VisitMyrtleBeach.comJan. 15: Santorum in S.C. Says Obama Views America as a ‘Mistake,’ Divides NationJan. 15: Greetings From Myrtle BeachJan. 14: Romney Leads by 21 Points in S.C.?Category: Election […]

  11. Memo From the National Affairs Desk: Somewhere, There Is an Island … : The Other McCain
    January 22nd, 2012 @ 9:55 pm

    […] My Son, the C-SPAN StarJan. 15: Good-Bye, Governor AsteriskJan. 15: VisitMyrtleBeach.comJan. 15: Santorum in S.C. Says Obama Views America as a ‘Mistake,’ Divides NationJan. 15: Greetings From Myrtle BeachJan. 14: Romney Leads by 21 Points in S.C.?/**/ […]