The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Rick Santorum Gets ‘The Kind of Optics a Cash-Strapped Candidate Can’t Buy’

Posted on | December 29, 2011 | 26 Comments

DAVENPORT, Iowa
That’s how Alexander Burns of Politico sums up the elements that compose the last-minute “Santorum Surge” here in Iowa. The question is how high that surge will go, and the situation here in Iowa is so turbulent now that it is impossible for anyone to say. I spent hours driving to Pella yesterday for a Rick Perry event and I’ve got photos, videeo, etc., I’ve yet to upload. But as I was driving back — intending just to drop by the Santorum event in Cedar Rapids and shoot some quick photos for the blog prior to writing my American Spectator column about the Perry campaign — the news broke about the CNN poll.

In fact, I heard the news on the car radio, which I’d just turned to a Cedar Rapids talk-radio station when the host introduced his next guest, a guy named . . . Rick Santorum. And in making the introduction, the host mentioned the new CNN poll. Obviously, this news changed my plans:

Rick Santorum took time to shake the hands of everyone who attended his “Faith, Family & Freedom Rally” [in Cedar Rapids] Wednesday night, and stayed nearly an hour after the scheduled end of the event to answer questions from the Republican audience. Only then did he take time to talk to the press.
“People are trying to determine right now, ‘Who can we really trust?'” the former Pennsylvania senator told a small group of reporters at a brief impromptu press conference after the event. “I think it’s going to build. I feel very good that we’re not going to stop there and, hopefully, keep moving up the ladder.”
The Republican presidential candidate was responding to the latest Iowa poll by CNN and Time magazine that shows him now in third place in the Hawkeye State, moving ahead of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Texas Gov. Rick Perry. The poll confirmed the widespread impression of many Iowa-watchers that Santorum’s low-budget campaign is surging in the final days leading up to next Tuesday’s precinct caucuses. According to the CNN/Time poll, Santorum’s support has increased from 5 percent to 16 percent in the past three weeks, while Gingrich’s support has collapsed from 33 percent to 14 percent.
Santorum refused to speculate on how far “up the ladder” he might climb by the time votes are counted Jan. 3. “No, I’m not going to pick a number and no, I’m not going to tell you what place I’m going to finish,” he told reporters. . . .

Read the whole thing at The American Spectator. And let me ask you something: Why is Rick Santorum’s campaign “cash-strapped”? Don’t you people know how to click on the link to his Web site and give him money? I think you do. So go do it now.

Category: Election 2012, Fear and Loathing in Iowa, Iowa, Rick Santorum

Comments

26 Responses to “Rick Santorum Gets ‘The Kind of Optics a Cash-Strapped Candidate Can’t Buy’”

  1. Dan Gillen
    December 29th, 2011 @ 8:57 am

    Why on earth would I want to give him money?  This is turning into 2008 all over again.  Rick Santorum is now playing the part of that dolt Huckabee.  He’s a candidate with no money, and no organization who’s going to propelled by evangelicals because of his mix of pandering and identity politics.  He’s also a dead duck out of the state but this might get him enough momentum to spit the vote with the other conservative candidates handing Mittens the nomination.   

  2. Anonymous
    December 29th, 2011 @ 9:06 am

    I never understood how the most electable candidate in the race — who won TWICE in a Democrat congressional district and TWICE in a state that has 1 million more Democrats than Republicans — including winning a race against an opponent managed by venerable Democrat strategist James Carville — ever had issues with “electability”.  

    EVERY conservative I know had a “I love Santorum, but can he win?” thing going on.   That was almost entirely attributable to the MSM which had selected its “acceptable, moderate, ‘frontrunners'” and pretty much forced them on the electorate.  

    But anyone who did the research, and saw, particularly, the Rick Santorum speech at Dubuque in 2009 (on C-Span’s archives), delivered without notes or a teleprompter, knows that this guy would shred Barack Obama in a one-on-one debate.  

    So the answer on “electability” is “Yes!”, bigtime, and there should be no doubt.  Moreover, he has organization in NH and SC, so he can go the distance.

    Perry’s proven he’s not ready for prime time; Bachmann is gaffe and mistake-prone; she’d get “Sarah Palin” treatment in the popular media (Saturday Night Live, late night comics, etc.) Gingrich is as maleable as Romney, with a different position depending on the audience.   I cannot imagine anyone with a conservative bent and hoping to win supporting anyone other than Rick Santorum.

    Santorum 2012.  Give America a Chance, Again.

  3. ThePaganTemple
    December 29th, 2011 @ 9:23 am

    Bachmann’s so-called “gaffes” were blown all up out of proportion by the same media you are criticizing for their treatment of Santorum and whom others criticized for their treatment of Cain. You don’t get to bitch about your candidate being slighted when you jump on the media meme about others and take off running with it.

  4. Gimlette
    December 29th, 2011 @ 9:56 am

    Alright.  I’m listening.  

    How does he win the general election without PA? What states do you see him winning?  What battleground/purple states do you think he has an edge in over Obama?  Do you think he can win Florida, because he sure isn’t going to win NY, CA, or IL. Or PA.  

    Or, is he just in to grab a couple of delegates in IA and pray Romney pays off all of his campaign debt in exchange. And then goes forth to raise his speaking fees 15%.

  5. Anonymous
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:06 am

    Jump on a B.S. media meme and run with it?
    Sorta like the Malkin site, Hot Gas?
    As for Santorum, besides swearing to start Armageddon, what will he do about any of the corruption and lawlessness that is totally out of control in D.C. and the source of all woes?

  6. richard mcenroe
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:10 am

    If all he’d wanted to do was rake in the jack, he could have done that writing a newsletter and sticking earmarks in bills he knew he could vote against and they’d still pass.

  7. richard mcenroe
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:22 am

    I didn’t sour on Bachmann because of her gaffes.  I soured on her because of her profound lack of judgment in hooking up with the anti-vaccine kooks.

  8. richard mcenroe
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:24 am

    Maybe we should elect someone who’s passed one bill in twenty-five years and expect him to cut five government agencies.

    Santorum was the floor lead on welfare reform and one of the Gang of Seven who broke the House Bank and Post Office scandals.  He has a better record at cleaning out the garbage than most anyone else still in the GOP race.

  9. Steve in TN
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:40 am

    19.

  10. Gimlette
    December 29th, 2011 @ 10:57 am

    Never mind the fact that he hasn’t been able to vote against diddlysquat since 2008.   

    How does he win without PA?

  11. Anonymous
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:14 am

    You’ve been reading too many other pundits.

  12. richard mcenroe
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:16 am

    Anyone still think the VA FUBAR was the candidates’ fault?  “Virginia GOP to demand loyalty oath to vote.” 
    http://tinyurl.com/dyweesz

  13. EBL
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:22 am

    You know you want to follow the herd.  And cowboy “the other mccain” is here to round you up.  

  14. ThePaganTemple
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:22 am

    Yet when the vaccine controversy was actually first started, way before Bachmann made it an election issue in the debates, it seems like the entire conservative wing of the GOP were “anti-vaccine kooks”.

  15. EBL
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:24 am

    I know that number.  I know why you cited it.  

  16. Rick Santorum Spars With Al ‘Not So’ Sharpton (Video) | Lee Hernly
    December 29th, 2011 @ 12:06 pm

    […] keep up with the ‘Santorum Surge,’ be sure to read Robert Stacy McCain at The Other McCain (and don’t forget to hit the tip jar…). Related Posts:Rick Santorum 150% Right On Trump […]

  17. Romney Beats Obama Head to Head, Santorum Rises in Iowa | The Lonely Conservative
    December 29th, 2011 @ 12:57 pm

    […] three weeks, while Gingrich’s support has collapsed from 33 percent to 14 percent. (Read More)The Other McCain has more on what’s happening in Iowa, where the caucuses are only a few days away.PS-Santorum […]

  18. Mike F.
    December 29th, 2011 @ 1:28 pm

    OK, E-Verify….talk to me. Coulter got my attention on this issue.

  19. richard mcenroe
    December 29th, 2011 @ 2:36 pm

    I don’t know about the conservative wing, but I didn’t buy it, and my brother with the two autistic kids was livid at the bullshit.  You can imagine his opinion of Bachmann.

  20. ThePaganTemple
    December 29th, 2011 @ 5:52 pm

    It was a big issue back when Perry first started the Gardasil program. For what its worth that’s one of two things I agreed with Perry on over Bachmann the other one being this bullshit about a border fence in the middle of the Rio Grande. But that’s neither here nor there, the point is the Gardasil program was controversial during its very limited life, and it was conservatives who were against it. Bachmann was merely reminding conservatives of an issue that was pretty much over with by then, but which they did care about at one time, as a way of pointing out the kind of things Perry was noted for.

  21. Quartermaster
    December 29th, 2011 @ 6:22 pm

    Really! I really don’t like Mittens or Newt, but Santorum on Immigration leaves me cold. His position can only be described as insanity.

    The skinny blonde attorney is right on this one, alas.Frankly, we have a bunch of midgets running for POTUS.

  22. Quartermaster
    December 29th, 2011 @ 6:29 pm

    Nah! Coulter is right about Santorum. Sorry.

  23. IOWA NOTEBOOK: Occupy Caucuses? : The Other McCain
    December 29th, 2011 @ 7:54 pm

    […] 29: ‘Everyone Sells Out in Iowa’Dec. 29: Rick Santorum Gets ‘The Kind of Optics a Cash-Strapped Candidate Can’t Buy’Dec. 28: SANTORUM SURGE: Finally, the Polls in Iowa Are Catching Up With … MeDec. 28: Greetings […]

  24. Rick Santorum Gets ‘The Kind of Optics a Cash-Strapped Candidate … | News Strom
    December 29th, 2011 @ 8:42 pm

    […] Posted on | December 29, 2011 | 8 Comments […]

  25. Anonymous
    December 29th, 2011 @ 11:27 pm

    This ‘surge’ is coming purely at Newt’s expense- and a direct result of unprincipled scumbag Romney and his ma$$ive war chest.

    But the only real result of all this will be as Mittens intended, with Newt taken down suddenly he’s out front in ‘conservative’ Iowa… with the only worst candidate than him -Ron Paul- right up top there with him… great!

    Of course, this is precisely why I switched from Bachmann to Newt… she and Santorum don’t have the skills  to beat Obama or run the country imho, and backing such candidates will only hand the nomination to Romney…  and maybe the WH right back to Obama,  too 

  26. ‘Occupy’ Protesters at Bachmann HQ: Proof That Gardasil Causes Retardation? : The Other McCain
    December 31st, 2011 @ 7:24 pm

    […] 29: IOWA NOTEBOOK: Occupy Caucuses?Dec. 29: ‘Everyone Sells Out in Iowa’Dec. 29: Rick Santorum Gets ‘The Kind of Optics a Cash-Strapped Candidate Can’t Buy’Dec. 28: SANTORUM SURGE: Finally, the Polls in Iowa Are Catching Up With … MeDec. 28: Greetings […]