Apology for NSFW Rule 5 Sunday
Posted on | December 20, 2010 | 18 Comments
As regular readers know, our trusty blog sidekick Smitty has been deployed as a REMF Stealth Ninja in an undisclosed location ending in “-stan.” At last report, the Admiral is currently (a) fighting the terrorist menace of bad Java scripts while (b) bitching about the lack of bandwidth.
In the meantime, Smitty’s usual weekend duties have been taken over by Wombat, who apparently neglected to read the fine print in the guidelines for “Rule 5 Sunday” entries. While I’ve managed to lose my copy of the guidelines in the incredible mess on top of my desk, my memory is clear that entries must adhere to a PG13 standard.
Which is to say: No nipples. No nookie. Nothing NSFW.
Understand that we’re not trying to be puritanical here. We are not anti-nookie, and we are certainly not anti-nipple. Especially the pink puffies with large aureolas.
But I digress.
The idea of Rule 5 Sunday is to provide some nice cheesecake. Bikinis are OK. Cleavage is OK. Lingerie is OK. Especially the white lacy kind with pink ribbons.
But I digress.
We must, however, draw the line at outright nudity. Unfortunately, a certain blogger who shall remain nameless submitted a post that included photos of women who were in a most shameless state of dishabile, so as not only to display the entirety of their extremely large breasts, but also providing unsuspecting readers with a shocking glimpse of their Brazilian-waxed naughty parts. And this gratuitous naughtiness was inadvertantly linked by Wombat in the Rule 5 Sunday post.
We regret this unfortunate error, and will try to avoid future errors. As a public service to the blogging community, we provide the following example of the type of photos which are not eligible for Rule 5 Sunday.
If you click on that image . . . Well, certainly we cannot be held responsible for what you might see. You have been warned!
UPDATE: Speaking of grossly offensive images:
You can blame Frequent Commenter Joe for that one.