The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

Palin Derangement Syndrome Outbreak: There Are Still Five A’s in Raaaaacism

Posted on | September 4, 2010 | 91 Comments

“With enough courage, you can do without a reputation.”
— Rhett Butler, Gone With the Wind

Some things are predictable — i.e., that the Palin-haters would decide it was a good time to recycle the old SPLC/LGF attacks on me in order to exploit my interview with Todd Palin for a guilt-by-association smear. When Rachel Maddow tried the same trick last fall — based on my friend Lynn Vincent’s collaboration with Sarah Palin on Going Rogue — I made a few points in my response:

I don’t have to explain myself or prove a negative. . . .
There is no obligation for me to speak a word in my own defense.

Earlier this year, I described the Left’s tactics in dealing with an LGF attack on Dennis Prager:

  • Bad Faith – The accusation that conservatives are motivated by bad faith (mala fides) is essential to the Left’s attacks. Stigmatizing and marginalizing conservatives is much easier than debating them. Cogent arguments about policy become unnecessary to advancing the Left’s political agenda if they can dismiss its opponents as racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.
  • The Ransom Note Method – By carefully selecting “evidence” of bad faith, the Left is able to present a distorted image of its conservative targets. Out-of-context quotes and controversial biographical data are cherry-picked and re-assembled (in the manner of a kidnapper assembling a ransom note) to present the target in the most damning possible light. This method is particularly effective against conservative talk-radio personalities who engage in polemic battle with leftists. This is why Media Matters devotes such enormous resources to monitoring talk radio in hopes of grabbing a 40-second “gotcha” sound-bite.
  • The ‘Links and Ties’ Method – More than simple guilt-by-association, the Links-and-Ties Method involves presenting a chain of incidental connections to suggest a sympathy of views that does not actually exist. To wit: Target A once spoke at Event B which was sponsored by Group C, co-founded by Person D who once made controversial statement E. By this method, it is implied that Target A actually endorses Statement E.
  • Telescoping and Telepathy – The actions, statements and associations of a conservative target acquire a trans-temporal permanence in the smear attacks of the Left. Once a target is associated (however incidentally) with controversy, this association can be repeated endlessly as evidence of bad faith, no matter how many years intervene. Furthermore, if the target is associated in Year X with a respectable person or organization that becomes controversial in Year X+5, that association can be cited in Year X+10 as evidence against the target – even if the target had no involvement in the cause of controversy. Finally, all evidence of bad faith accumulated by these methods is presented as indicative of the target’s deepest and unwavering personal convictions, as if the accuser were possessed of telepathic mind-reading abilities.
  • Deny, Denounce, Repudiate – The key to these attack methods is the presumption of the target’s guilt. The accuser, having carefully selected the evidence to be discussed in the manner of a prosecutor making an indictment, demands that the target deny the accusation, denounce the bad-faith views involved, and repudiate the persons and organizations to whom he has been connected by the links-and-ties method. As anyone who has been targeted by such attacks can attest, it’s rather like being accused in one of Stalin’s infamous Moscow “show trials.”

What is at the root of this game is the accuser’s moral authority to act as Grand Inquisitor. The accuser arrogates to himself the unquestionable righteousness to judge the accused, who is then expected to attempt to prove his innocence.

If you play that game, you’re accepting the accuser’s authority.

The idiocy of the accusation that I am a “white supremacist” ought to be obvious: What, exactly, does “white supremacist” mean in 2010? Have I ever advocated any such policy? Do I hatefully derogate non-whites or espouse some bizarre theory of racial superiority?

I do not, and never have.

Remember that it is not sufficient proof of such a serious charge to say that, over the course of a long career, I have occasionally made ill-considered statements or that I have associated with people whose reputations may be even worse than my own. In the first instance, I’ve written many thousands of words which my accusers never bother to cite — e.g., my 2008 feature about Lt. Col. Allen West or my April profile of Vernon Parker — and in the second instance, a journalist necessarily makes a wide range of acquaintances.

I don’t like being told what to think or what to say, and I don’t make a habit of letting other people decide who I can be friends with. Some of my conservative friends can’t understand why I’m friends with that horrible reprobate Dave Weigel, for example, while my liberal friends — and I do have some of those — are shocked that I’m friends with that nasty Dan Riehl fellow. (I may even be part of Dan’s “ilk“!)

Having many friends who can vouch for my bona fides — people of good reputation who know me personally and never once had cause to think of me as a racist hatemonger — I expect that many voices will defend me from the likes of Phil Munger, an instigator of this latest attack.

Hate is against my religion. If I am commanded to pray for my enemies, why then should I hate entire races of people whom I’ve never met and who have done me no harm?

If I do not hate, neither will I fear. There are important stories I need to be covering, and I’ve got better things to do than to seek vengeance on a bunch of pissant “progressives” whose only claim to fame is their vicious obsession with the Palins. I’m past caring what such people think of me, but if I am called on to fight in defense of the good name of the Palins, I’m prepared again to invoke the war oath of Clan Cameron:

Chlanna nan con thigibh a so’s gheibh sibh feoil! 

“Sons of the hounds, come here and get flesh!”

And there are still five A’s in raaaaacism.

UPDATE: Linked by Jehuda the Rhetorican — thanks! BTW, if you don’t know who Phil Munger is, here’s a reminder:

Within hours of her death, [Rachel] Corrie was transformed from human being to sacred symbol, an icon revered by the “Blame Israel First” crowd. She was subsequently glorified in a cantata composed by a University of Alaska professor (who has since become a notorious anti-Palin blogger) and in a play that ran for 48 performances on Broadway.
Exploited to advance the anti-Israel cause, this symbolic Rachel Corrie functions in death as the real Rachel Corrie functioned in life, scapegoating Jews and acting as a human shield for terrorists.

Yeah: Munger composed the St. Pancake Cantata. He’s one of those anti-Israel types who constitute the Sirhan Sirhan wing of the Democratic Party. He doesn’t believe in the Book of Genesis, you see, so he doesn’t take Chapter 12, Verse 3 seriously.

UPDATE II: Welcome, Instapundit readers!

UPDATE III: Let’s see, I went to Wasilla on Thursday and two days later, Joe McGinniss decides he’s moving out? Just a coincidence, I’m sure.

UPDATE IV: Linked by Rich Crowther at Conservatives for Palin, Joe at Valley of the Shadow, No Sheeples Here, Sissy Willis, Gathering of Eagles, Pirate’s Cove, and Dan at Gay Patriot. 

Dave C at Point of a Gun reminds us of the liberal argument: “Shut up!”

Now a thread at Memeorandum.

UPDATE V: Linked by Patrick at Political Byline and by Da Tech Guy who describes me thus:

[H]e is an interesting passenger to share a car with, he is on perpetual hyper-drive, smokes like a chimney and is a coffee vampire.

“Coffee Vampires for Palin” would be a great blog name.

UPDATE VI: Piece of Work in Progress is also a great blog name.

Category: Alaska, Racism, Sarah Palin

Comments

91 Responses to “Palin Derangement Syndrome Outbreak: There Are Still Five A’s in Raaaaacism”

  1. TJ Parker
    September 5th, 2010 @ 1:43 pm

    “One sad thing about leftists is …”

    The sad things about rightists is that their motto is “my way or the highway”, and their whole modus operandi is herding through fear, outrage, scape-goating and outrage at their imagined victimization.

  2. TJ Parker
    September 5th, 2010 @ 9:43 am

    “One sad thing about leftists is …”

    The sad things about rightists is that their motto is “my way or the highway”, and their whole modus operandi is herding through fear, outrage, scape-goating and outrage at their imagined victimization.

  3. Tide
    September 5th, 2010 @ 10:16 am

    Did you see the Julio catch ? Julio Jones is DA Man !

    Also calling Stacy an Alabama Cracka @ss Cracka is a labor of love .

  4. Tide
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:16 pm

    Did you see the Julio catch ? Julio Jones is DA Man !

    Also calling Stacy an Alabama Cracka @ss Cracka is a labor of love .

  5. joe cioffi
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:22 pm

    First off the Rachel Corrie play was not on broadway but was off broadway ( and i mean way off in a hole in the wall theatre in the east village. I went to see it with my college student daughter and never have i been more surrounded by self loathing anti israel leftists in my life. The play was the longest 10 hours of my life (and that was the first act!). Leaving and listening to the anti-israel rhetoric was enough to make ones skin crawl.

  6. joe cioffi
    September 5th, 2010 @ 10:22 am

    First off the Rachel Corrie play was not on broadway but was off broadway ( and i mean way off in a hole in the wall theatre in the east village. I went to see it with my college student daughter and never have i been more surrounded by self loathing anti israel leftists in my life. The play was the longest 10 hours of my life (and that was the first act!). Leaving and listening to the anti-israel rhetoric was enough to make ones skin crawl.

  7. Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove
    September 5th, 2010 @ 10:34 am

    […] The Other McCain discusses the continuation of Palin Derangement Syndrome […]

  8. IForgotMyName
    September 5th, 2010 @ 3:04 pm

    “The low point of the evening, the point at which I finally started to quietly weep and whisper to myself “Oh, dear God!” was when a courageous young Palestinian-American man was shouted down, with one of the shouters yelling something along the lines of “Shut up, you’re not even human.” Several people then applauded.”- Phil Munger

    Funny how he doesn’t seem to have any trouble dehumanizing the Palins.

  9. IForgotMyName
    September 5th, 2010 @ 11:04 am

    “The low point of the evening, the point at which I finally started to quietly weep and whisper to myself “Oh, dear God!” was when a courageous young Palestinian-American man was shouted down, with one of the shouters yelling something along the lines of “Shut up, you’re not even human.” Several people then applauded.”- Phil Munger

    Funny how he doesn’t seem to have any trouble dehumanizing the Palins.

  10. I take a day off from the net and Stacy Gets attacked again… « Da Techguy's Blog
    September 5th, 2010 @ 12:14 pm

    […] todd palin 0 I planned on taking a day or two off with scheduled posts and what happens, the left goes nuts over Todd Palin talking to Stacy […]

  11. UPDATED: Sorry, but this is just stupid | Political Byline
    September 5th, 2010 @ 12:21 pm

    […] The Man, being Mr RSM, responds to this rather stupid attack; and does it rather well too. […]

  12. jefferson101
    September 5th, 2010 @ 4:29 pm

    It seems to me that in todays climate, a corollary to Godwin’s Law would be appropriate.

    I see it going something to the effect that “The first commenter/commentator/politician to introduce charges of racism into something to which the charges are obviously irrelevant to anyone who doesn’t have a Master’s Degree in Black Studies or Women’s Studies has already lost the argument.”

    That’s probably racist, too, but since I’m already branded as an “ilk”, I might as well be called racist, too.

    Anyone that the left isn’t calling racist this month is probably a tool anyway.

  13. Joe
    September 5th, 2010 @ 4:29 pm

    joe cioffi, I hear you brother. I hear you.

    Nothing is more pathetic than the secular canonization of Rachel Corrie. She was a misguided and lied to young woman who died being on the wrong side of a cause she really knew nothing about.

  14. jefferson101
    September 5th, 2010 @ 12:29 pm

    It seems to me that in todays climate, a corollary to Godwin’s Law would be appropriate.

    I see it going something to the effect that “The first commenter/commentator/politician to introduce charges of racism into something to which the charges are obviously irrelevant to anyone who doesn’t have a Master’s Degree in Black Studies or Women’s Studies has already lost the argument.”

    That’s probably racist, too, but since I’m already branded as an “ilk”, I might as well be called racist, too.

    Anyone that the left isn’t calling racist this month is probably a tool anyway.

  15. Joe
    September 5th, 2010 @ 12:29 pm

    joe cioffi, I hear you brother. I hear you.

    Nothing is more pathetic than the secular canonization of Rachel Corrie. She was a misguided and lied to young woman who died being on the wrong side of a cause she really knew nothing about.

  16. Oh really?: “Reverend” Al “Interloper” Sharpton says that Alabama State Senate District is “Heir Property” for African-Americans | Political Byline
    September 5th, 2010 @ 1:08 pm

    […] In-Farking-deed! I always hear Blacks; all liberals of course, trashing America and complaining about how they are always oppressed by the White Man. I have one thing to say to them —- you can always go back where you originated from and live there and see how well you live. However, when someone does that; they are automatically called RAAAAACIST! […]

  17. glenn
    September 5th, 2010 @ 6:23 pm

    well done RSM, Journalism is not dead, you’ve articulated the the facts, set the meme and discombobulated the propagandists. this story is gonna leave a mark.

  18. glenn
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:23 pm

    well done RSM, Journalism is not dead, you’ve articulated the the facts, set the meme and discombobulated the propagandists. this story is gonna leave a mark.

  19. LCR
    September 5th, 2010 @ 6:44 pm

    Got you linked this Sunday morning here:

    http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/09/robert-stacy-mccain-touches-on-palin.html

  20. LCR
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:44 pm

    Got you linked this Sunday morning here:

    http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/09/robert-stacy-mccain-touches-on-palin.html

  21. savage
    September 5th, 2010 @ 6:49 pm

    I got your post coming up on my site this afternoon. Good job!

  22. savage
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:49 pm

    I got your post coming up on my site this afternoon. Good job!

  23. Cassy Fiano
    September 5th, 2010 @ 2:56 pm

    […] The Other McCain Palin Derangement Syndrome outbreak […]

  24. The Left’s Smear Machine Gins Up « The Underground Conservative
    September 5th, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

    […] McCain fires back here. What is an interesting read is how he summarizes the five methods the Left uses to destroy anyone […]

  25. How come nobody ever smears me for associating with Stacy McCain? « The TrogloPundit
    September 5th, 2010 @ 3:31 pm

    […] How come nobody ever smears me for associating with Stacy McCain? Do I have to invite him to my house first? Is that it? […]

  26. swift boater
    September 5th, 2010 @ 8:42 pm

    I think a White Supremacist in 2010 would be a person akin to the late Robert Byrd or someone who knowingly owns property with racial covenants on it and makes no effort to remove them like the Kennedy’s.

    But since I am obviously a racist what do I know??

  27. swift boater
    September 5th, 2010 @ 4:42 pm

    I think a White Supremacist in 2010 would be a person akin to the late Robert Byrd or someone who knowingly owns property with racial covenants on it and makes no effort to remove them like the Kennedy’s.

    But since I am obviously a racist what do I know??

  28. Abe Lincoln
    September 5th, 2010 @ 9:22 pm

    I would like it very much if that personification of an idiot would stop calling people racist. Everybody is a racist. I was a racist when I was a Senator running for President. I was a racist when I walked all them miles to return just a few pennies. But if it had been fifty dollars I never would of done it. Now Charles Johnson…stop talking about me. Take care o all those Muslims you have on your site. Muslims, atheists and communists. Jimmah and weasil wow what a name of a couple muslims.

  29. Abe Lincoln
    September 5th, 2010 @ 5:22 pm

    I would like it very much if that personification of an idiot would stop calling people racist. Everybody is a racist. I was a racist when I was a Senator running for President. I was a racist when I walked all them miles to return just a few pennies. But if it had been fifty dollars I never would of done it. Now Charles Johnson…stop talking about me. Take care o all those Muslims you have on your site. Muslims, atheists and communists. Jimmah and weasil wow what a name of a couple muslims.

  30. Amanda Read
    September 5th, 2010 @ 9:55 pm

    I just saw Philip Munger’s post about his interview with Todd Palin. I loved this response of Todd’s:

    “Lots of articles, huh. That doesn’t mean anything.”

    Todd Palin unnerves wusses, and they’re apparently STILL trying to figure out how to unnerve him: http://unliberal.com/2010/08/27/stalking-sarah-palin-the-comedy/

    Because “racist” has essentially become the default insult of the 21st century, I have a difficult time taking it seriously. That’s not to deny that racism existed or exists among some people to this day, but the accusation is grossly inflated.

    What did Munger mean when he said you were bragging? Maybe he stuck that in there just in case “racist” wasn’t convincing enough.

    A losing opponent’s strategy for winning a debate is to redefine the debate. As long as they keep it in the quibble corner they’re comfortable with, they gloat like winners.

  31. Amanda Read
    September 5th, 2010 @ 5:55 pm

    I just saw Philip Munger’s post about his interview with Todd Palin. I loved this response of Todd’s:

    “Lots of articles, huh. That doesn’t mean anything.”

    Todd Palin unnerves wusses, and they’re apparently STILL trying to figure out how to unnerve him: http://unliberal.com/2010/08/27/stalking-sarah-palin-the-comedy/

    Because “racist” has essentially become the default insult of the 21st century, I have a difficult time taking it seriously. That’s not to deny that racism existed or exists among some people to this day, but the accusation is grossly inflated.

    What did Munger mean when he said you were bragging? Maybe he stuck that in there just in case “racist” wasn’t convincing enough.

    A losing opponent’s strategy for winning a debate is to redefine the debate. As long as they keep it in the quibble corner they’re comfortable with, they gloat like winners.

  32. Jimmy Page
    September 5th, 2010 @ 10:54 pm

    Charlie still is hear broken over the fact that Pammy rejected him.

  33. Jimmy Page
    September 5th, 2010 @ 6:54 pm

    Charlie still is hear broken over the fact that Pammy rejected him.

  34. DEZ
    September 6th, 2010 @ 3:41 am

    Clowns to the left of me, moonbats to the right.
    Break out the chain guns again…

  35. DEZ
    September 5th, 2010 @ 11:41 pm

    Clowns to the left of me, moonbats to the right.
    Break out the chain guns again…

  36. As If On Cue . . . : The Other McCain
    September 6th, 2010 @ 12:47 am

    […] agenda if they can dismiss its opponents as racist, sexist, homophobic, etc.” – Robert Stacy McCain, Atlanta native who says the Journal-Constitution hasn’t been worth the paper it’s […]

  37. Breakfast Scramble (Monday)
    September 6th, 2010 @ 6:03 am

    […] McCain kent spell, however he sure can write, from Other McCain: Some things are predictable — i.e., that the Palin-haters would decide it was a good time to […]

  38. Charles Johnson
    September 8th, 2010 @ 9:04 pm

    More smears from the racist McCain. I love seeing my point about the right going over the cliff shown to be true over and over again.

  39. Charles Johnson
    September 8th, 2010 @ 5:04 pm

    More smears from the racist McCain. I love seeing my point about the right going over the cliff shown to be true over and over again.

  40. O’DONNELLPHOBIA! Media Discovers Dreaded Gay-Hating Extremist Theocrat Is Related to People Who . . . Uh, Aren’t : The Other McCain
    September 16th, 2010 @ 11:52 pm

    […] evil and dangerous and lurking in your children’s closets!It’s just like the ”raaaaacism” thing: Left-wing fear-mongers keep beating that drum to remind everyone that America is […]

  41. Townhall VP Garthwaite: Alan Moore’s Statements Slagging Christine O’Donnell ‘Unfortunate and Unauthorized’ : The Other McCain
    September 17th, 2010 @ 8:12 pm

    […] decided to make me one of his scapegoats.When left-wingers started hitting me with that “raaaaaacism” smear, George claimed to have heard me say things in the newsroom that would have gotten me […]