The Other McCain

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." — Arthur Koestler

VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi, Genius

Posted on | July 2, 2010 | 24 Comments

In which she explains that unemployment checks create jobs:

“Now, let me say that unemployment insurance, we talk about it as a safety net and the rest — this is one of the biggest stimuluses [sic] to our economy. Economists will tell you, this money is spent quickly. It injects demand into the economy and it’s job-creating. It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name because, again, it is money that is needed for families to survive, and it is spent. So it has a double benefit — it helps those who have lost their jobs, but it also is a job-creator and so, uh, for that reason — for those two reasons at least — it should be passed, and I’m optimistic that it will.”
— Nancy Pelosi, July 1, 2010

This sort of gobbledygook is the logical end-point of Keynesian economics, with its obsessive focus on demand-side inputs — including government redistribution programs — whereas a far more effective stimulus to economic growth is capital investment, a/k/a, the supply side.

Also, notice the predictable demagoguery: At the end, she says, “It’s impossible to think of a situation where we would have a country that would say we’re not going to have unemployment benefits.” But nobody is talking about eliminating unemployment benefits. The measure Pelosi is arguing for would extend benefits for those who’ve already maxed-out at 99 weeks:

Democrats have been trying for more than a month to pass a bill extending jobless benefits to more than 1 million people. Currently, jobless benefits last nearly two years — up to 26 weeks paid by state treasuries with federal help for up to an additional 73 weeks.

However sympathetic one may be to such people — hey, it’s tough all over — it is simply absurd to say that giving them another 13 or 26 weeks of unemployment checks is the way to “create jobs.”

(Via Hot Air Headlines and Memeorandum.)

UPDATE: Ed Morrissey plays “Let’s Count the Straw Men” with Nancy’s argument, and makes reference to the latest unemployment numbers:

The United States added just 83,000 private-sector jobs in June, a dishearteningly low number that could add to the growing number of economists who warn that the economic recovery is stalling. . . .

(That was no “recovery.” That was a dead-cat bounce.)

The economy needs to add about 130,000 to 150,000 jobs a month just to keep pace with new workers entering the market. The labor pool is already packed with 15 million Americans looking for work. . . .

(A solid argument for reducing illegal immigration.)

The week or so leading up to Friday’s report offered a grim rat-a-tat-tat of statistics pointing to a slowing economy. Auto sales were off more than expected, as sales plunged 30 percent in May, a far greater drop than expected. And unemployment claims rose by 13,000 to 472,000, which is far higher than usual if one is looking for signs that private payrolls are growing in a sustained fashion. . . .

(Why would you be “looking for signs”?)

The Obama administration has put much political currency into its effort to grow the economy, and most to the point, jobs. Only a month ago, after an April jobs report that showed employers added 290,000 jobs — a number revised Friday to 313,000 — President Obama declared the numbers “particularly heartening.”
And just two weeks ago, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. christened this “Recovery Summer,” with an emphasis on the jobs created by the administration’s $787 billion economic stimulus measure passed in February 2009.

“Recovery Summer” is withering on the vine. Instead of seeking advice from Nancy the Job-Creator, how about recalling that I predicted this failure from the outset?

Category: Economics, Nancy Pelosi, Video

Comments

24 Responses to “VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi, Genius”

  1. Joe
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 2:18 pm

    Nancy, yes, go to 4:05 please. Yes, that was for you.

    I do want to thank you though. When the economy further goes into the toilet, that video may make a good attack ad clip.

  2. Joe
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 10:18 am

    Nancy, yes, go to 4:05 please. Yes, that was for you.

    I do want to thank you though. When the economy further goes into the toilet, that video may make a good attack ad clip.

  3. Roxeanne de Luca
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 2:51 pm

    This sort of gobbledygook is the logical end-point of Keynesian economics, with its obsessive focus on demand-side inputs

    If a rich guy pays someone for being unemployed, yes, that person will buy things, but no wealth has been created, since wealth is created through labour and intelligence.

    If the rich person pays the poor person to paint a picture, landscape his yard, or vacuum his house, the same amount of money will cycle through the economy, but it’s an economy with an extra painting, a prettier yard, or a cleaner house.

    Should the wealthy guy pay a poor but brilliant person to improve upon the iPod or make a vaccine, then we have the same result, in an economy with a better, cheaper iPod or a vaccine that did not exist before.

    That’s what these brain trusts in DC don’t understand.

  4. Roxeanne de Luca
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 10:51 am

    This sort of gobbledygook is the logical end-point of Keynesian economics, with its obsessive focus on demand-side inputs

    If a rich guy pays someone for being unemployed, yes, that person will buy things, but no wealth has been created, since wealth is created through labour and intelligence.

    If the rich person pays the poor person to paint a picture, landscape his yard, or vacuum his house, the same amount of money will cycle through the economy, but it’s an economy with an extra painting, a prettier yard, or a cleaner house.

    Should the wealthy guy pay a poor but brilliant person to improve upon the iPod or make a vaccine, then we have the same result, in an economy with a better, cheaper iPod or a vaccine that did not exist before.

    That’s what these brain trusts in DC don’t understand.

  5. Idiot of the Week (7/2) « Red Dog Report
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 10:58 am

    […] more detail on the absolute ridiculousness of that remark, Stacy McCain has a great breakdown at TOM, but auspices of this post it is suffice to say […]

  6. keyboard jockey
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 5:40 pm

    created or saved – that’s Progressive for Money grows on trees 🙂

  7. keyboard jockey
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 1:40 pm

    created or saved – that’s Progressive for Money grows on trees 🙂

  8. Estragon
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 7:21 pm

    I agree with Roxeanne @ #2 in general principle, but I do think the best economic stimulus America could achieve would be to qualify Nancy, Barry, Harry, Barney, Henry, & friends for a weekly unemployment check.

  9. Estragon
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 3:21 pm

    I agree with Roxeanne @ #2 in general principle, but I do think the best economic stimulus America could achieve would be to qualify Nancy, Barry, Harry, Barney, Henry, & friends for a weekly unemployment check.

  10. Live Free Or Die
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 5:30 pm

    A genuine Female Forrest Gump…Stupid is as stupid does.

  11. Live Free Or Die
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 9:30 pm

    A genuine Female Forrest Gump…Stupid is as stupid does.

  12. Living proof that spending the way out of a recession does not work | Political Byline
    July 2nd, 2010 @ 11:38 pm

    […] Think maybe now the Democrats will finally get it? Guess again. (h/t The Other McCain) […]

  13. SDN
    July 3rd, 2010 @ 5:56 am

    it’s actually an argument for restricting all immigration until we get back to 5% unemployment. There are no jobs Americans won’t do when they don’t have a government check to fall back on.

  14. SDN
    July 3rd, 2010 @ 1:56 am

    it’s actually an argument for restricting all immigration until we get back to 5% unemployment. There are no jobs Americans won’t do when they don’t have a government check to fall back on.

  15. Richard McEnroe
    July 3rd, 2010 @ 5:41 pm

    Linked. Nancy may have missed a few subtle economic points

  16. Richard McEnroe
    July 3rd, 2010 @ 1:41 pm

    Linked. Nancy may have missed a few subtle economic points

  17. VIDEO: Tea Party Speaker Declares, ‘I Don’t Care If They Call Me an Extremist’ : The Other McCain
    July 5th, 2010 @ 4:15 pm

    […] Because I’d rather be standing here with you all today than to be standing with the Speaker of the House that said unemployment checks are the way that you create jobs.”ALLEN WEST FOR U.S. CONGRESS var addthis_append_data='false';var addthis_language='en';var […]

  18. Friday News Round Up :: The Lonely Conservative
    July 7th, 2010 @ 7:21 pm

    […] not even in remission. Jumping in Pools has the latest jobs news, it’s not that great. The Other McCain has more on Nancy Pelosi’s stupid little “unemployment is good for employment” […]

  19. Which Is Better for the Economy: Getting a Job or Collecting Unemployment? : The Other McCain
    July 8th, 2010 @ 3:22 pm

    […] the Economy: Getting a Job or Collecting Unemployment?Posted on | July 8, 2010 | No CommentsWhen Nancy Pelosi declared that unemployment compensation “creates jobs faster than almost any ot… most people laughed at this obvious affront to common sense. Yet considering that common sense […]

  20. House plan overturning Obamacare halfway there | MorallyRight.org
    July 8th, 2010 @ 5:41 pm

    […] VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi, Genius : The Other McCain […]

  21. Friday’s Marriage Jubilee: RSM’s Aging : The Other McCain
    July 10th, 2010 @ 7:43 am

    […] list. Pose, flex, flex.So-called Scholars Beclown ThemselvesDaTechguyHaemetZingstrom’s BlogVIDEO: Nancy Pelosi, GeniusRed Dog ReportPolitical BylineThe Lonely ConservativeMorally RightA. Because It’s […]

  22. Rachel Maddow and the Politics of Stupid : The Other McCain
    July 12th, 2010 @ 4:08 am

    […] notices here is the similarity between Maddow’s statement about unemployment-as-stimulus and Nancy Pelosi’s recent remarks. What I notice, however, is a message that cleverly muddles the policy picture in such a way as to […]

  23. American Realize It Won’t Work : The Other McCain
    July 13th, 2010 @ 11:14 am

    […] News poll, with 40 percent saying they had confidence in Obama, and 54 percent saying they did not.Nancy Pelosi thinks unemployment checks create jobs, but the real job-creators know better:Confidence among U.S. […]

  24. Raise Fareed Zakaria’s Taxes! : The Other McCain
    August 3rd, 2010 @ 10:30 am

    […] maybe Fareed Zakaria could get laid off and collect 99 weeks of unemployment compensation. And, as Nancy Pelosi has reminded us, unemployment checks are a big job-creator, so Zakaria being out of a job would do even more for […]